• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

LM Supplies Manager Question Regarding Sale Of Ballast

Andy873

Established Member
Joined
23 Mar 2017
Messages
1,408
In early 1966, the LM Region's Supplies Manager writes to the Estates Department asking for consent for putting up for sale almost 88,000 cubic yards of old ballast on a closed line, which will be put out to competitive tendering. Now I understand why the Estates Dept has to give consent to the sale of this ballast, but why is it left to the Supplies Manager to sell it?

Why isn't the Estates Dept dealing with this sale? or perhaps the Civil Engineering Dept?
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

sh24

Established Member
Joined
28 Sep 2023
Messages
1,471
Location
London
Maybe the Suppliers Manager (Procurement in 2020’s speak) was considered to have the right commercial skills to maximise value from the sale?
 

Magdalia

Established Member
Joined
1 Jan 2022
Messages
7,317
Location
The Fens
In early 1966, the LM Region's Supplies Manager writes to the Estates Department asking for consent for putting up for sale almost 88,000 cubic yards of old ballast on a closed line, which will be put out to competitive tendering. Now I understand why the Estates Dept has to give consent to the sale of this ballast, but why is it left to the Supplies Manager to sell it?

Why isn't the Estates Dept dealing with this sale? or perhaps the Civil Engineering Dept?
At the time the British Railways Board had a Supplies Committee that was in charge of supplies. This mainly involved purchases (anything from uniforms to sleepers) but also included disposals. It was very bureaucratic, with price thresholds determining which contracts had to go to the BRB Supplies Committee for approval, which had to be reported to the the BRB Supplies Committee, in a report produced every three months, and which could be decided at a regional level, without reference to the BRB Supplies Committee. Each region would have a Supplies Manager, and each regional board probably had its own Supplies Committee too, with another lot of price thresholds.

It was the 1960s bureaucratic way of controlling expenditure. Estates or Civil Engineering wouldn't be dealing with the sale because they were not budget holders and had no power to buy or sell.
 

Andy873

Established Member
Joined
23 Mar 2017
Messages
1,408
Maybe the Suppliers Manager (Procurement in 2020’s speak) was considered to have the right commercial skills to maximise value from the sale?

At the time the British Railways Board had a Supplies Committee that was in charge of supplies. This mainly involved purchases (anything from uniforms to sleepers) but also included disposals. It was very bureaucratic, with price thresholds determining which contracts had to go to the BRB Supplies Committee for approval, which had to be reported to the the BRB Supplies Committee, in a report produced every three months, and which could be decided at a regional level, without reference to the BRB Supplies Committee. Each region would have a Supplies Manager, and each regional board probably had its own Supplies Committee too, with another lot of price thresholds.

It was the 1960s bureaucratic way of controlling expenditure. Estates or Civil Engineering wouldn't be dealing with the sale because they were not budget holders and had no power to buy or sell.
Sorry for the late reply to this. I see what you're both saying here, perhaps if you've got the right skills for negotiating purchases then I'm sure you would be ok dealing with tenders for the sale of something.
 

Top