QueensCurve
Established Member
- Joined
- 22 Dec 2014
- Messages
- 2,195
I know the Ansaldo signally had some problems but it came with bidirectional signalling. I hope this facility isn't going to be lost.
-
Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!
Trains all at a stand in the Manchester area... (Thursday afternoon 06AUG2026)
- Thread starter Mcr Warrior
- Start date
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R
RailUK Forums
Sir Felix Pole
Established Member
The line was completely closed for months between Cheadle Hulme and Crewe in 2006 - at great personal inconvenience to me - attempting to get the Ansaldo system to work on this relatively straightforward section. Wilmslow only had a token service to Manchester via the Styal line. It has had its 'moments' ever since and the bi-di is rarely used. I hope the replacement system implementation goes rather more smoothly!
So were the battery chargers at my employers. If the FM had done nothing at all the battery would have been trickle charged and the system would have worked when called on for real.
I recounted this story bc many failures of automatic systems are caused by a misguided intervention or someone switching something to bypass or leaving an interlocked cover open.
It wouldn't surprise me if something like that has happened here. Or some corrective action previously found to be necessary has not in fact been implemented (cf replacing the transformer bushing at Heathrow).
I imagine a few factors would have been at play there. Firstly Crewe displacement, the job was stopped through the castlefield corridor and at Oxford Road for the rest of the day so TPE and Northern would have had traincrew stranded all over the place to the west of Manchester. Also TPE and Northern's west side control reside in the ROC and it sounds like they were also impacted by the telecoms outage for a period of time.
Wheras Avanti operations at Liverpool and Picadilly are much simpler, you have crews starting their duties there and London crews working into and out of both. And Avanti control wouldn't have been trying to get back on its feet after a telecoms/it outage.
I didn't say one phase lost, I said 1 phase struggling, there is a big difference! The problems occur when one phase is suffering not lost and just above threshold voltage but with the waveform distorted and appalling power factor, so it passes the simple voltage threshold test with no load. The fun then begins when the load is reconnected...
Class 466
Established Member
Based on my experience of a 16 seater Ford Transit on pre-planned Rail Replacements today with Northern - it’s clear they’re not being followed already.
Why would that be the case here?
1. if SPENW had cleared the fault in 90 secs that was presumably by switching something e.g. a faulty cable in/out, there was little time to do much else and none to change out any equipment, so why would/could that result in one phase being dodgy?
2. as the fault was on some higher voltage circuit 2 miles away it would have had a big catchment area, what (small) proportion of the total load would Manchester ROC be? Given also that much of the load (domestic/commercial) would have been present as soon as the supply was re-instated, so when the ROC tried later to reconnect the usual status quo would already have been re-established?
I would disagree, it seems to be used more regularly, it was used a couple of days ago with down services using the up platform at Cheadle Hulme, and a day or so previously I saw an Alderley Edge terminator using the down line from Wilmslow to Alderley Edge. It gives additional flexibiltity which seems to be used, perhaps not ‘“rarely” but not “frequently” either.
Nicholas Lewis
Established Member
This is from a periodical operating notice from two years ago and is list of workstations and their control areas in Manchester ROC at the time. It may have been added to since then?
Anyhow were services impacted across nine workstation areas?
Anyhow were services impacted across nine workstation areas?
HST125Scorton
Member
and how many compliant vehicles would be on hand for a total regional shutdown with no notice? (compared with planned engineering ops on a limited number of lines.) Almost certainly nowhere near enough.
So what's your point? Yes, few buses are available at the drop of a hat. That's also always been the case, and won't be likely to change any time soon. The operators who are willing to pay the premium rate for on-the-day orders are always able to secure something, of course. The ones who won't frequently don't. Again nothing has changed.
== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==
The bi di as specified isn't really that much use. It's quite inflexible north of Handforth and south of Sandbach. Being unable to access platform 1/2 at Wilmslow from the north means that it's bi di on a plain two track section with limited crossovers, the only three platforms at Sandbach and loops at Chelford.
The most excitement it is actually useful for is a down express overtaking a down stopping service at Wilmslow, which does happen from time to time.
Last edited:
But people are saying "It's in the contract, so of course there will be enough." I'm saying that the contract doesn't cover providing enough compliant vehicles to cover a whole region's rail services at the drop of a hat - nor would you expect it to. So of course you can't expect them to be magicked up just like that.
see your post 418.
I'm really not. I know what a UPS is. I used to rely on them.
Times have moved on. Battery power stations now operate as a UPS by simply switching power as quick as a traditional UPS. A UPS is not intended to last a long time, but give time for a computer system to be transferred to another source of power, or safely shut down and save critical data. Okay, you can add more battery packs (many UPS systems still use lead acid batteries) for longer life - but they aren't intended to be another source of power for hours, or even potentially days.
Yes you can still buy a UPS and they still serve a purpose, but I'm talking about batteries that operate like a standard grid mains supply. A smooth 50Hz power supply and near instantaneous switchover.
I have a system at home that is ready to do this, but I opted to save the £500 or so to add the EPS controller because power cuts are rare. But I don't run a control centre with computers that may misbehave if they power down unexpectedly.
You're confused. That was about pre-planned works, not rail replacement at no notice.
At the end of the day the law is the law for very good reasons, and it isn't having substantial negative effects, so being a sore loser that others are being considered at your own expense is unlikely to be getting you very far.
Accessible loos and auto announcements reading out the next stop are the absolute bare minimum of a 21st century public transport service. It's totally wrong-headed to complain about these being mandatory.
LondonExile
Member
Where I work (not railway), we have UPS cover plus generators set to auto-start with automatic transfer switches.
Whilst I don't know what has gone wrong at Manchester ROC - it looks quite similar from the outside to a fault we had a couple of years ago. Our DNO lost power for approx. 10m and the generator started. The auto transfer switch commanded a switch to generator supply, and the way that is physically done is via motorised MCCBs (circuit breakers larger than you'll have at home...) To prevent backfeeding the grid, or connecting supples together out of phase, the changeovers are break before make, i.e. it goes Grid -> Nothing -> Generator (or vice-versa)
We had a spindle physically snap in the MCCB whilst it was in the middle "Nothing" position, meaning we had a dead supply from the grid, a generator spun up but doing nothing to actually help the situation and a UPS still counting down its battery life. Cue frantic calls for on-site electricians to see if we could get bypass circuits operated (as by this point the DNO supply was back, but we were no longer connected to it!), but the UPS drained and we lost service before our electricians could physically get to the plant room (which was remote from the offices they were based in.)
If the low-level protection itself breaks, the solution to keeping service going probably sits further up the stack (i.e. second bank of desks on different protective systems from a different feed etc.)
4 of those boxes are double manned, plus the associated relief. So had it been resignalled in 2003 as planned, the costs savings over the last 23 years wouldn't exactly be insignificant.
And? The ROC was specced in 2012 and opened in 2014 or therabouts. With generator backup. The battery power station technology would not have been competitive or mature at that time and there would be no reason to retrofit it, assuming the genny could be maintained in good order. In any case it would seem the load never got as far as being transferred to it.
Depends on the UPS. Industrial ones are designed to last indefinitely, switching between sources of power as required to keep their load alive, only triggering a shutdown when there is no other option.
A battery power station is designed to cover short periods when there is no incoming mains supply. That's it. Once it's batteries die it's out of use for the foreseeable, exactly the same as a domestic UPS with a single mains input.
I'm not suggesting they buy a Anker Solix power station! I was talking about grid level battery storage that is now economically viable and could power an entire building for some considerable time, doing away with the need for a generator backup for some time (if at all). I think more and more industry will be looking at essentially off-grid solutions in the future, but I think this is going around in circles so let's leave it here.
Agreed. 7-8 figure opex savings are not insignificant, but are always a relatively small clawback in 8-9 figure resignalling schemes.
The Planner
Veteran Member
- Joined
- 15 Apr 2008
- Messages
- 19,627
No
== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==
How were you expecting the get into 1 and 2 from the North at Wilmslow? Handforth to Cheadle Hulme is 2 and a half miles, not exactly a great distance. Its not bi-di south of Sandbach anyway as its a different section and panel. You have the crossovers at Chelfiord, Goostrey, Alderley Edge and Cheadle Hulme South. The longest section between crossovers is about 5 miles between Sandbach and Goostrey.
Last edited:
You can't. The tracks aren't connected.
It's technically possible to reverse at Cheadle Hulme, but it's so difficult to do it's incredibly rare.
Usual words to the press. Not to be taken too literally......
And here is the nub of the issue. Centralising to "improve efficiency" will by its nature introduce the ability to have a far wider consequence from failure than is the case in a less centralised system.
I remember the old "through routes" mode on the Western psbs. Basically the show was run in a pre-determined layout by the local interlocking whilst the central brain sorted itself out and then took back control.
Further back, there were many individual signalboxes, experienced staff in and close to each of them and a system that was much easier to fix. So a problem like a power outage of one 'box was much less disruptive.
The cost of efficiency is loss of resilience, twas ever thus. The modern culture also being a slavish follower of the Religion of Progress (I.e. New and Shiny must always be better than old and reliable and computers are always better than people) doesn't help.
Nor am I convinced that the costs of centralising are ever admitted, rather Opex and Capex costs are separated with the latter invisible so that having the latest shiny toy can be justified......
TPO
Bevan Price
Established Member
- Joined
- 22 Apr 2010
- Messages
- 8,316
We will have to wait for an official explanation - if one is ever released, but two comments
1. Rechargeable batteries jave finite, and sometimes unpredictable lives. Sometimes they appear to be taking charge, but fail catastrophically without warning.
2. Is it possible that external interference, e.g computer system hacking , created some of the problems ?
1. Rechargeable batteries jave finite, and sometimes unpredictable lives. Sometimes they appear to be taking charge, but fail catastrophically without warning.
2. Is it possible that external interference, e.g computer system hacking , created some of the problems ?
Signalling (OK - And the bean counters) has resisted that trend for over a century and people still swing large metal levers to make stuff move.
Luckily every single signal box, however old, has a computer keeping those pesky humans in check. The Victorians made their computers from shaped pieces of metal to follow fixed algorithms. Those mechanical interlockings are still ‘better than people’, a century and a half later.
My colleague has been working on a repower of a signalling site in Germany which is moving to using on site solar and BESS backed up by a grid connection. One requirement of the redesign is to spec the batteries to run the site for 2 hours in the event of grid issues.
A similar upgrade to UK ROC's etc would mean at least no one should end up stranded on trains in a similar situation.to this one.
A similar upgrade to UK ROC's etc would mean at least no one should end up stranded on trains in a similar situation.to this one.
bahnause
Member
The standard-gauge rail network in Switzerland is probably one of the most centralised. Nevertheless, it is also one of the most reliable and resilient. This is not in spite of centralisation, but largely because of it. Improving efficiency is only a small part of the picture. It is much more about ensuring a continuous flow of information, which simplifies the management of both major and minor disruptions. Whilst normal operations are largely automated, staff can focus on dealing with incidents. As an example, operators can set route
macros to automate bypasses when technical disturbances occur. The same applies to passenger information, which also draws on data from the system. Gone are the days when the information displayed at station X was completely different from that at station Y, because each was managed locally. The same applies to ensuring connections (not only) in the event of delays. These are also managed centrally within the system (often automatically by the system) and are forwarded to the peripheral systems (station displays, online services, apps). No more guesswork on the part of staff or customers.
Even in centralised systems, there is nothing that would make something like this impossible. In fact, it is a technique used almost everywhere in Switzerland to overcome local failures. Signal box technology is, after all, still largely based on a local infrastructure. Thanks to sensible data network planning, there is usually more than one way to (remote) control these local signal boxes, and the core hardware of the control system itself also incorporates built-in (geo-)redundancy.
The benefits in day-to-day operations far outweigh the potential for large-scale outages. A fundamental feature of the system used in Switzerland is the separation of the functional level and the operational level. The functional level consists of so-called ‘cells’, which are responsible for controlling the signal boxes and for automatic train control. The operator level comprises a small number of ‘operator clusters’, which are used to operate the individual cells. This breaks down the original operational boundaries, as the entire rail network can be accessed from any operator workstation. Should a workstation within an operator cluster fail, any other workstation can take over its function.
Last edited:
bahnause
Member
It depends on the location... Older relay-based systems were a bit simpler; these were powered by the local mains supply in the event of a failure in the railway power supply. The 16.7 Hz frequency wasn’t a problem for these systems – all the lights just flickered a little. It could give you a bit of a headache after an hour or so.
Modern signal boxes have a UPS which bridges a brief power cut and a second power supply. This can be a different line from another local grid or an inverter connected to the railway power supply.
Larger junctions and the operations centres have a UPS and an emergency power unit with diesel generators.