Totally agree.I find it interesting that it would seem no-one on the interview panel (or however his appointment was chosen) asked for any details of support for the claims he made - they seem to be all taken as fact.
Contrast this with my own experience at B.R., when every modest claim of experience or knowledge on my vacancy application form was scrutinised forensically by the interview panel.
The athletic and charity claims might go by the wayside but anything relevant to my job will be scrutinised. Not to mentioned national vetting.