• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Project Oval: TfL win DfT contract to expand contactless system to 233 rail stations by May 2024, Railcards coming to contactless payment cards

Haywain

Veteran Member
Joined
3 Feb 2013
Messages
24,608
In some ways, it is a little surprising that Project Oval hasn't been used as an opportunity to remove more anomolies, such as historically cheaper fares on some routes.
On the contrary, Project Oval is just creating whole new sets of anomalies. Living in the contactless area but with the Oval area now just outside there are anomalies for travel to and from London and for northbound journeys that mean you need to compare various sets of fares to find the best according to when you are travelling.
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

Bletchleyite

Veteran Member
Joined
20 Oct 2014
Messages
113,225
Location
"Marston Vale mafia"
On the contrary, Project Oval is just creating whole new sets of anomalies. Living in the contactless area but with the Oval area now just outside there are anomalies for travel to and from London and for northbound journeys that mean you need to compare various sets of fares to find the best according to when you are travelling.

Oval is full of split anomalies - the obvious one is the cross London peak restrictions (as the electronic systems can't implement "only apply this on boarding the first train" as would be needed to align them) but there are also simple split anomalies in simple singles on direct trains that don't cross London! A shoddy job really.
 

Sonic1234

Member
Joined
25 Apr 2021
Messages
792
Location
Croydon
And where buying beyond your destination/starting point is now beneficial too. Thameslink at the weekends for one example.
 
Joined
5 Sep 2020
Messages
177
Location
Berkshire
At one of the TVMs at Earley, shortly before 0900, I buy an offpeak day return to Reading (valid from 0900) and load it onto my smartcard.
Then I touch the smartcard on the reader again, to confirm that the ticket has loaded. (The ticket is described, surprisingly, as a Corporate Off Peak Day Return.)
Then, shortly after 0900, I go to one of the new validators and touch the smartcard on the yellow disc. The display changes from:
Present Card for Entry or Exit
To:
Card not valid 12
This is, I believe, a recent change, and that the old yellow validators would have displayed: Journey Started.
If I do the same as above but after 0930, I don't get an error message, the display says: Entry.
Presumably this is to do with the extension of contactless payment.
ThisIMG_6469.jpegIMG_6471.jpeg 'Card not valid' message seems unsatisfactory.
Ok, when contactless arrives at Earley, the offpeak time to Reading will become 0930.
However smartcard tickets from Earley are available to many places outside the proposed contactless area, eg Bournemouth (offpeak day return valid from 0745), and presumably these time restrictions will not change.
 
Last edited:

MikeWh

Established Member
Associate Staff
Senior Fares Advisor
Joined
15 Jun 2010
Messages
8,563
Location
Crayford
I have seen a suggestion that Sunday's fare update included stuff for the forthcoming extensions on SWR and SE, so this would potentially make some sense. However, people who should know within a TOC are telling me that nothing will happen before November.
 

CyrusWuff

Established Member
Joined
20 May 2013
Messages
5,441
Location
London
Yearly check in, which stations are available and when will Guildford be a part of the scheme?
No change since the 20 Greater Anglia stations that were held back from December to March went live.

No date has been announced for the next batch of stations to go live, but looking at BRFares suggests Guildford is likely to be included due to the presence of test fares (PAT and POT.)
 

Fazaar1889

Member
Joined
5 Oct 2022
Messages
629
Location
South East
No change since the 20 Greater Anglia stations that were held back from December to March went live.

No date has been announced for the next batch of stations to go live, but looking at BRFares suggests Guildford is likely to be included due to the presence of test fares (PAT and POT.)
Thanks! Can you clarify test fares PAT and POT?
 

MikeWh

Established Member
Associate Staff
Senior Fares Advisor
Joined
15 Jun 2010
Messages
8,563
Location
Crayford
Oyster fares appear in the fares database using types:

PAP - Anytime PAYG fare
POP - Off-peak PAYG fare

Where only contactless is valid the types are:

PAC - Anytime C-PAYG fare
POC - Off-peak C-PAYG fare

While fares are being set up in advance of a new extension of project Oval, test fares appear in the database:

PAT - Anytime test PAYG fare
POT - Off-peak test PAYG fare

Also, the coverage map on my site https://oysterfares.com/south-east-...overage-map-for-payg-fares-in-the-south-east/ shows where PAYG is accepted currently in all of its phases, and where the next phase is expected to be. Guildford via both Cobham and Woking is indeed expected later this year, although that might slip depending on progress.
 

Meglos

Member
Joined
19 Dec 2020
Messages
193
Location
london
Oyster fares appear in the fares database using types:

PAP - Anytime PAYG fare
POP - Off-peak PAYG fare

Where only contactless is valid the types are:

PAC - Anytime C-PAYG fare
POC - Off-peak C-PAYG fare

While fares are being set up in advance of a new extension of project Oval, test fares appear in the database:

PAT - Anytime test PAYG fare
POT - Off-peak test PAYG fare

Also, the coverage map on my site https://oysterfares.com/south-east-...overage-map-for-payg-fares-in-the-south-east/ shows where PAYG is accepted currently in all of its phases, and where the next phase is expected to be. Guildford via both Cobham and Woking is indeed expected later this year, although that might slip depending on progress.
Will Guildford via the Mole Valley line be included? The route to Dorking is already PAYG.
 

londonbridge

Established Member
Joined
30 Jun 2010
Messages
1,877
I’m eligible for a senior railcard later this month…..any news or updates on when railcard discounts might actually be implemented on contactless??
 

mickey

Member
Joined
11 Mar 2010
Messages
684
Hasn't been mentioned on the thread so far, but ltfares and TfL do now show an OSI through Windsor stations. I’ll test it soon and report back (unless someone else gets there first!) to make sure it works. In a rare nicer-than-expected development, the fares shown include much of the SWR network and not just the direct stations served from Windsor - slightly more expensive than via Ealing-TG-Richmond, but much more pleasant and the route I’d choose by default. Would love it to be included on a Travelcard too, but maybe that’s a dream too far.
 

MikeWh

Established Member
Associate Staff
Senior Fares Advisor
Joined
15 Jun 2010
Messages
8,563
Location
Crayford
I’m eligible for a senior railcard later this month…..any news or updates on when railcard discounts might actually be implemented on contactless??
Nothing recent, though the change from Cubic to Indra is supposed to mean long talked about improvements will now happen.
Hasn't been mentioned on the thread so far, but ltfares and TfL do now show an OSI through Windsor stations. I’ll test it soon and report back (unless someone else gets there first!) to make sure it works. In a rare nicer-than-expected development, the fares shown include much of the SWR network and not just the direct stations served from Windsor - slightly more expensive than via Ealing-TG-Richmond, but much more pleasant and the route I’d choose by default. Would love it to be included on a Travelcard too, but maybe that’s a dream too far.
Yes, there is a new OSI at Windsor. I covered it on my site last month https://oysterfares.com/new-windsor-osi/.
This has all been fixed with the recent fares revision on July 5th. There is now a proper OSI joining together journeys including the walk between Riverside and Central. New fares have been set up which are activated by exiting one station and entering the other, while the default fares are set at the level expected when travelling via Central London. The length of time allowed to walk between the stations is a very generous 40 minutes, so no need to worry about admiring the sights of Windsor or the river walk while you make your way.
I'm curious to know which journey you've found where the Windsor route is more expensive. Slough to Staines is certainly cheaper via Windsor.
 

mickey

Member
Joined
11 Mar 2010
Messages
684
I'm curious to know which journey you've found where the Windsor route is more expensive. Slough to Staines is certainly cheaper via Windsor.
Slough to Twickenham, Richmond, Clapham Junction, Putney, Fulwell, Kingston, Feltham, Brentford Loop are all more expensive via Windsor.
 

MikeWh

Established Member
Associate Staff
Senior Fares Advisor
Joined
15 Jun 2010
Messages
8,563
Location
Crayford
Slough to Twickenham, Richmond, Clapham Junction, Putney, Fulwell, Kingston, Feltham, Brentford Loop are all more expensive via Windsor.
Ah, right, I hadn't looked that far in. To be honest, I'm not surprised with some of those because you are starting off by going the wrong way.
 

mickey

Member
Joined
11 Mar 2010
Messages
684
Ah, right, I hadn't looked that far in. To be honest, I'm not surprised with some of those because you are starting off by going the wrong way.
Agreed for some - logically I’d expect the cut-off to be Twickenham (and the southbound loop from there), as this is where I’d normally go through Windsor rather than Ealing (which I do for Richmond and east thereof) - but seems they’ve gone instead for a blanket ‘everything in the Zones should be priced higher than TfL’. Still happy the option is now there though.

Back to the Oval extension, I’m looking forward to (/hoping for) sensibly-priced options for Esher-Woking through Windsor when that line is added. It’s a pain having to change four times but the journey tends to be fairly quick and is much nicer than going through London.
 

Edvid

Established Member
Joined
7 Feb 2008
Messages
2,490
I've noticed that journeys within Zones 13/14 i.e. Merstham - Gatwick Airport inclusive are still subject to the higher Shenfield-floor caps. I'm guessing GTR chose not to apply the December 2025 capping adjustments to those particular journeys because:

* The number of passengers who'll reach those caps without involving London is practically zero
* As a CPAY-only station neighbouring Reigate is only capped for journeys to/from Zones 1-9
 

MikeWh

Established Member
Associate Staff
Senior Fares Advisor
Joined
15 Jun 2010
Messages
8,563
Location
Crayford
I've noticed that journeys within Zones 13/14 i.e. Merstham - Gatwick Airport inclusive are still subject to the higher Shenfield-floor caps. I'm guessing GTR chose not to apply the December 2025 capping adjustments to those particular journeys because:

* The number of passengers who'll reach those caps without involving London is practically zero
* As a CPAY-only station neighbouring Reigate is only capped for journeys to/from Zones 1-9
This is not the information I have had from GTR themselves. Oyster will charge up to the higher cap, but an automatic refund will take it down to the lower level the next day.
 

Mark J

Member
Joined
12 May 2018
Messages
657
I still very much maintain that Oval is a poorly implemented idea.

Those who cannot see past the 'benefits' of Contactless, still fail to grasp this comes at the cost of axing the cheapest fares.

I also argue it will see fare evasion increase.

Some people will do contactless on the outward journey when barriers are closed and ticket checks more likely.

However, they will evade paying for the return journey when station barriers are likely to be open and ticket checks are non existent - usually in the later evening.

If i was that way inclined, I could easily halve my fare on some Contactless routes. Although I would need to touch in and out during the day, I know from experience (on SWR routes) when barriers are likely to be open and can get away with no ticket checking.

It will just see some people switching from one type of evasion to another.
 

jon0844

Veteran Member
Joined
1 Feb 2009
Messages
30,877
Location
UK
Many people seem happy to tap and open the gates if they find the gates are closed when they expected them to be open. If you hang near a gateline you'll see loads of people finding their card rejected whey try and enter, meaning they've done it enough times for TfL to blacklist their card.

They'll then attempt to use another card and that will either be blocked, or they'll get in and do the same thing next time. I assume they don't understand how things work.

Tapping out instead of being made to pay a penalty fare or have details taken is clearly favourable, but it doesn't work forever.

The other 'switch' is of course buying a short ticket on the platform, but now more and more short tickets can't be issued as e-tickets and require collection.

Fare evaders will always want to evade fares!
 

Haywain

Veteran Member
Joined
3 Feb 2013
Messages
24,608
I also argue it will see fare evasion increase.

Some people will do contactless on the outward journey when barriers are closed and ticket checks more likely.

However, they will evade paying for the return journey when station barriers are likely to be open and ticket checks are non existent - usually in the later evening.
Aren't they already doing that with paper tickets?
Those who cannot see past the 'benefits' of Contactless, still fail to grasp this comes at the cost of axing the cheapest fares.
I think that's been discussed at some length on this thread already, by people who can see both the benefits and the disadvantages. Where the cheapest fares have gone, it's is usually the case that single fares have reduced in price so there are always swings and roundabouts.
 

Edvid

Established Member
Joined
7 Feb 2008
Messages
2,490
This is not the information I have had from GTR themselves. Oyster will charge up to the higher cap, but an automatic refund will take it down to the lower level the next day.
I don't doubt that happens if you cross the Z6/13 boundary, but it's a different matter if you don't. Either that or the TfL open data for journeys within Z13/14 is incorrect.

GTW - CDS day caps.jpeg
Screenshot above shows Z14 (Gatwick Airport only) to Z6 (e.g. Coulsdon South) is capped at £40.80 / £24.10.

GTW - MHM day caps.jpeg
Screenshot above shows Z14 (Gatwick Airport only) to Z13 (e.g. Merstham) is capped at £42.00 / £26.80.

HOR - CDS day caps.jpeg
Screenshot above shows Z13 (e.g. Horley) to Z6 (e.g. Coulsdon South) is capped at £36.00 / £20.00.

HOR - MHM day caps.jpeg
Screenshot above shows Z13 only (e.g. Horley - Merstham) is capped at £40.00 / £26.80.

It's the same for journeys in the opposite direction.
 

MikeWh

Established Member
Associate Staff
Senior Fares Advisor
Joined
15 Jun 2010
Messages
8,563
Location
Crayford
I don't doubt that happens if you cross the Z6/13 boundary, but it's a different matter if you don't. Either that or the TfL open data for journeys within Z13/14 is incorrect.
The capping is not part of the open data. I need to look at how I'm deciding what to show when both stations are on the same line and beyond zone 9. There are two edge cases here; travel on two extensions (eg Epsom to Gatwick Airport) or the same extension but all beyond zone 9. The latter one is interesting because if it's contactless only then there are no caps. It's quite likely that someone travelling all day between Gatwick and Merstham would not cap on contactless, but would cap at the full Oyster rate if using Oyster. Or maybe the system does stop at the Oyster cap, but it probably wouldn't be reduced. Thank you for raising this issue.
 

MikeWh

Established Member
Associate Staff
Senior Fares Advisor
Joined
15 Jun 2010
Messages
8,563
Location
Crayford
Could you explain what the bolded hyphenated phrase means please?
Yes. Shenfield is in Oyster zone 12. Caps for a higher zone cannot be lower than those for a lower zone, so Shenfield has always dictated the caps charged on the Gatwick extension, although in the last few years the Gatwick anytime cap has risen above the Shenfield anytime cap.
 

swt_passenger

Veteran Member
Joined
7 Apr 2010
Messages
34,267
Yes. Shenfield is in Oyster zone 12. Caps for a higher zone cannot be lower than those for a lower zone, so Shenfield has always dictated the caps charged on the Gatwick extension, although in the last few years the Gatwick anytime cap has risen above the Shenfield anytime cap.
Ah, thanks. All goes back to the limited number of Oyster zones available in a four bit pattern?
 

Top