• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

SWR investigation email advice

hilscottgerron

New Member
Joined
3 Aug 2026
Messages
4
Location
Surrey
Hi everyone,

Firstly - what a brilliant forum this is. I’ve spent the last few days reading through various threads and I appreciate in advance people giving up their time to (hopefully!) help me out.

For around the last two years I have regularly commuted from Ashtead to London Waterloo, and I have always bought the correct ticket for those journeys. No problems.

However, on Thursdays I have often driven to Esher in the morning (where I play football after work) and commuted in from there. On a number of those Thursdays (about 23 instances over two years), I bought an Anytime Return from Vauxhall to London Waterloo rather than the correct ticket from Esher (where there is no barriers) to London Waterloo, despite actually travelling from Esher.

The first time, I didn’t realise I hadn’t bought a ticket until I was at Vauxhall… and had the clever idea of just buying a ticket from there. There was seemingly no immediate consequence, so it became a bad habit that I fully appreciate is wrong and unacceptable.

Correspondence from SWR

I think it is important to state that I have never been stopped by any member of staff or ‘caught in the act’.

I have seen in the news that SWR are ramping this sort of thing up. Anyway:

The first email I received (which went to my spam) was:

Dear Customer,

On 16th April 2026, a London Waterloo to Vauxhall ticket was used in the automatic ticket gate at London Waterloo to enter the station. A review of rail usage data found that this ticket is attributable to this email address. We are currently undergoing checks on this account as a result of it being flagged as suspicious.

Further investigation of your online account is ongoing, and preliminary assessment has identified other potential inconsistencies in your ticket purchase history. This suggests that you may not be paying the correct fare for journeys made on the UK rail network.

Given the serious nature of this matter, we have taken this step to contact you to engage with you.

Please respond to this email within 7 days quoting the reference number in the subject field.

-

I missed that email, and SWR then sent me a reminder saying they had not yet received a response and asking me to reply by 6 August.

On 30 July I replied simply:

Hi,

Apologies I missed this original email.

How can I help?

Best,
XX

-

SWR have now responded with the following:


Dear XX,

Many thanks for getting in contact.

We are currently at the start of our investigation into your ticket purchasing through your online account with Trainline. We have a Data Sharing Agreement with them, which has allowed us access to your online account and purchase history. The ticket presented at London Waterloo was flagged as suspicious and has been traced to your Trainline account, for which this is the contact email address.

We would like to talk to you about your purchase history through your online account, with a view to resolving this case.

We can continue the conversation several ways:

  • Via email – whereby I will need to verify your identity, then I will send you your Trainline purchase history asking you to comment on actual journeys made for tickets purchased (which will be highlighted);
  • I can arrange an interview – after I have confirmed your identity, I will arrange an interview which will be at a location on the SWR network, the interview will be conducted under caution and will be with me and another investigator (who will be taking notes of the interview). At the interview you will be presented with evidence from your ticket purchase history and will be asked to provide details of your actual journeys made for specific tickets purchased;
  • Arrange an initial telephone call – during which I will need to confirm your identity, then we can discuss the next steps of our investigation into your ticket purchase history.

When making your decision you should consider taking specialist Fare Evasion legal advice (details of solicitors specialising in this field can be found online) or consult other specialist transport organisations such as Transport Focus.


My questions

I’ve seen a number of threads on here where people have suggested that, when receiving such emails, the best course of action is simply not to engage with the train operator.

Given the position I’m now in, does that advice still apply?

My only response so far has been the short email above. I haven’t admitted anything, confirmed my identity, or answered any questions about my journeys.

Am I now past the point where not engaging would be sensible, or is that still something people would consider?

One thing that caught my eye is that SWR repeatedly say they first need to verify my identity before they can discuss the case or send me my purchase history. Is that simply a data protection/GDPR requirement, or does it suggest they haven’t actually established the required level of detail/evidence yet?

If engagement is the better option, I’m assuming people would recommend asking for the purchase history by email, rather than agreeing to an interview or phone call?

More generally, based on the correspondence above and the facts I’ve outlined, what outcome would experienced members expect here? Obviously, I want to avoid prosecution at all costs and will pay any fine if I need to. Given it’s not hundreds of instances, I would imagine (while expensive) it wouldn’t completely cripple me financially.

I’d really appreciate any advice. I know this is entirely of my own making - I’m young and stupid - but I’m trying to deal with it in the most sensible way possible.

Thanks so much in advance.
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

greatkingrat

Established Member
Joined
20 Jan 2011
Messages
3,289
If you did engage with them, the settlement would be 23x2 singles Esher-Waterloo (£9.60) plus say £300 admin fee, so something like £750.

However they admit in the original email they don't have any evidence, just suspicions, so the best advice is just to ignore them. Also stop using that Trainline account in future.
 

hilscottgerron

New Member
Joined
3 Aug 2026
Messages
4
Location
Surrey
If you did engage with them, the settlement would be 23x2 singles Esher-Waterloo (£9.60) plus say £300 admin fee, so something like £750.

However they admit in the original email they don't have any evidence, just suspicions, so the best advice is just to ignore them. Also stop using that Trainline account in future.
Thanks mate, much appreciated. I’ll go with that approach and if I get anything else I’ll return to this thread.

£750 would definitely sting! Such a silly thing to do given I was saving about… 3 quid per day, if that. Which would be less than £70 in total ‍♂️

Whatever happens it’s a lesson learned!

== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==

In future, as you are on their radar, I would buy tickets at the station rather than leave a digital footprint. And always buy the correct ticket for your journey.
Absolutely. Thanks for taking the time.
 
Joined
12 Nov 2025
Messages
137
Location
Cranleigh
Thanks mate, much appreciated. I’ll go with that approach and if I get anything else I’ll return to this thread.

£750 would definitely sting! Such a silly thing to do given I was saving about… 3 quid per day, if that. Which would be less than £70 in total ‍♂️

Whatever happens it’s a lesson learned!

== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==


Absolutely. Thanks for taking the time.
Perhaps I am missing something but why do you want to spend £750 for no good reason? Just ignore their emails and stop shortfaring,
Note that according to the original email they didn't even know your name!
Edit to add: here is a similar story: https://www.railforums.co.uk/threads/greater-anglia-email.305431/

The disadvantage of the approach above is that if they caught you a second time - and mistakes do happen, they are more unlikely to settle out of court. At the moment, as you have not been caught, just do not reply.
 

Haywain

Veteran Member
Joined
3 Feb 2013
Messages
24,508
The disadvantage of the approach above is that if they caught you a second time - and mistakes do happen, they are more unlikely to settle out of court.
We have seen no evidence on the forum to suggest that this actually the case.
 

hilscottgerron

New Member
Joined
3 Aug 2026
Messages
4
Location
Surrey
Perhaps I am missing something but why do you want to spend £750 for no good reason? Just ignore their emails and stop shortfaring,
Note that according to the original email they didn't even know your name!
Edit to add: here is a similar story: https://www.railforums.co.uk/threads/greater-anglia-email.305431/

The disadvantage of the approach above is that if they caught you a second time - and mistakes do happen, they are more unlikely to settle out of court. At the moment, as you have not been caught, just do not reply.
Oh no, I absolutely do not want to pay that! And likewise, will not short-fare again in this lifetime.

I obviously would/will pay if the alternative was prosecution, I just wanted some advice on whether at this stage I was obliged to engage etc.
 

Haywain

Veteran Member
Joined
3 Feb 2013
Messages
24,508
But would you recommend the OP to engage with them in any way?
No, absolutely not. Just stop the fare dodging. And if the OP isn't fare dodging they don't need to worry about where the tickets are being bought.
 

Fawkes Cat

Established Member
Joined
8 May 2017
Messages
5,253
A short answer is no. You are not obliged to engage unless you have been caught "in act", i.e. stopped by a member of staff with a non-valid ticket.
This is one to be careful with. If one has been caught in the act, then there are certain things you're obliged to do by the railway laws - most importantly, to give your name and address. But after that you're not obliged to engage.

But against that, what we see is that people who've been caught in the act and who ignore correspondence from the railway are taken to court: if they carry on and ignore the court then eventually the fine will be collected by bailiffs or by an attachment order against their earnings.

So our advice (which no one is obliged to take) is to reply to letters and so on if you have been caught in the act. This may be the same practical outcome as saying that they're obliged to co-operate, but it's rather different reasoning.
 

WesternLancer

Veteran Member
Joined
12 Apr 2019
Messages
14,957
This is one to be careful with. If one has been caught in the act, then there are certain things you're obliged to do by the railway laws - most importantly, to give your name and address. But after that you're not obliged to engage.

But against that, what we see is that people who've been caught in the act and who ignore correspondence from the railway are taken to court: if they carry on and ignore the court then eventually the fine will be collected by bailiffs or by an attachment order against their earnings.

So our advice (which no one is obliged to take) is to reply to letters and so on if you have been caught in the act. This may be the same practical outcome as saying that they're obliged to co-operate, but it's rather different reasoning.
well put
 
Joined
12 Nov 2025
Messages
137
Location
Cranleigh
This is one to be careful with. If one has been caught in the act, then there are certain things you're obliged to do by the railway laws - most importantly, to give your name and address. But after that you're not obliged to engage.

But against that, what we see is that people who've been caught in the act and who ignore correspondence from the railway are taken to court: if they carry on and ignore the court then eventually the fine will be collected by bailiffs or by an attachment order against their earnings.

So our advice (which no one is obliged to take) is to reply to letters and so on if you have been caught in the act. This may be the same practical outcome as saying that they're obliged to co-operate, but it's rather different reasoning.
I am afraid this is just getting confusing for the OP, who have never been stopped or caught. Why are discussing this here?
 

AlterEgo

Verified Rep - Wingin' It! Paul Lucas
Joined
30 Dec 2008
Messages
29,201
Location
LBK
I understand now. I would be grateful if you can explain what makes my advice to the OP poor.
Because you are never *obliged* to engage. You may simply remain silent or refuse to cooperate. Those are absolute rights.

It may sometimes be a better idea to cooperate, but that is not the same as being obliged to.
 

WesternLancer

Veteran Member
Joined
12 Apr 2019
Messages
14,957
I understand now. I would be grateful if you can explain what makes my advice to the OP poor.
Personally I think your advice post was too brief and without enough context and balance.

Hallmarks of a post made in haste using a phone perhaps?
We’ve all done it.

Fawkescat added some useful wider context that the op or other future readers of this thread would do well to see in full when weighing up an action along the lines you outlined.
In my view.
 

SECR 65

Member
Joined
2 Apr 2026
Messages
652
Location
East Sussex
I feel sure I have seen before a very similar email from a railway company to the one you've recieved with the options for further contact. However, despite searching with quotes from the letter, and looking through the disputes section back as far as late June, I cannot find the thread I am thinking of. Maybe it was TfL or another TOC? Do any members have any leads as I feel this would be a helpful resource to have?
EDIT - Ahah! Trying the search term 'interview', I have had success. This is why it's helpful to have the TOC in the thread title...
The letter in question appears in post #30. However, it appears that the OP was stopped in this case.

So, for the OP, to summarise / move on from the slight confusion that's occured above, I agree with what seems to be the consensus that you should not reply to this latest email. If they contact you again, please post that letter on the forum (with personal details redacted) as we would be interested to see their next steps, and can advise you if the advice not to reply still stands.
 

MotCO

Established Member
Joined
25 Aug 2014
Messages
6,084
When you responded by email, did you give your name and/or address or other information whereby they can identify you? If you gave an address near Esher, and your ticket was Vauxhall to Waterloo (a well-known dodge - most people would use Oyster for that journey), they would obviously suspect wrong-faring, but without you admitting it, they cannot prove it. Hence the advice not to engage with them - you are likely to self-incriminate yourself.

The other point (made above) is not to use your Trainline account any more. But, be aware that several other retailers use the Trainline platform, so be careful which retailer you use in future in case they can link across Trainline-affiliated accounts.
 

hilscottgerron

New Member
Joined
3 Aug 2026
Messages
4
Location
Surrey
When you responded by email, did you give your name and/or address or other information whereby they can identify you?
Thanks for all for the continued support. I signed off the ‘how can I help?’ email with my first name, but that’s obviously included in my email address too. I gave no address.

Haven’t had any follow up but will be sure to upload here for full awareness if I do.

With regards to the Trainline point, what’s the reasoning behind that? Is it not enough to just be diligent and ensure I always have the requisite ticket/railcard etc.? Thanks!
 

SECR 65

Member
Joined
2 Apr 2026
Messages
652
Location
East Sussex
With regards to the Trainline point, what’s the reasoning behind that? Is it not enough to just be diligent and ensure I always have the requisite ticket/railcard etc.? Thanks!
I suppose it's best to stop them following your every move. You will continue to be on their radar I'm sure - at least your Trainline account will be. It's possible for them to suspect invalid tickets are being purchased when one is indeed paying the correct fare. In very serious cases the railway company would and will send a team out when they've established you normally travel and catch you in the act.
 

Haywain

Veteran Member
Joined
3 Feb 2013
Messages
24,508
With regards to the Trainline point, what’s the reasoning behind that? Is it not enough to just be diligent and ensure I always have the requisite ticket/railcard etc.?
Opinions vary. I would say that it makes no real difference as long as you are buying the right tickets going forward. But there are a lot of other retailers and it's worth looking around to see if any of the others offer a better deal or better experience.
 

Top