• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

A Braintree to Sudbury railway

HalsteadA4r0n

New Member
Joined
31 Jul 2026
Messages
2
Location
Halstead, Essex
Hi all, I am a first time poster to the forum.

I have lived in Halstead, Essex all of my life, and having returned from university for the summer; the town's poor public transport system has become really noticable. There are fewer buses every hour than what my uni campus has during term time, road capacity on the A131 and A1124 is pretty much full, and there is no railway station (Braintree is the nearest at 6.6 miles away). I strongly believe that Halstead should have a railway connection. The former Colne Valley and Halstead Railway used to run east to west through the town; but that closed in the early 1960s (before the Beeching cuts), and it cannot be realistically restored as there is way too many obstacles in the way, plus IMO it would be the wrong direction (literally) to head down anyway.

What I think should be done instead is construct an entirely new commuter line - which I have hypothetically called the "Courtauld Line", after industrialist Samuel Courtauld who owned a textile factory in Halstead and had other ties to the area. The line would be roughly 16 miles long, operate on an average speed of ~50 mph (for a 20 minute journey time), and run from Sudbury in the north to Braintree in the south. Halstead would be a station along the way, alongside a station in Gosfield plus a third Braintree Station in Bocking Church Street.

What would the specifics be? I'm not really sure at the moment.
  • Rolling Stock - I'm thinking the Class 755 could be used, but that might be a bit much even though they're used on the nearby Gainsborough Line.
  • Exact Route - I don't know where the line would cross over the A131, and how exactly Braintree and Sudbury stations would be linked, especially Sudbury.
  • Electrification - probably not (hence the 755). The Braintree Branch Line is electrified, but the Gainsborough Line from Sudbury isn't, and this hypothetical line is connecting the lines together into a sort-of loop.
I was wondering what everyone here thinks about this. I have not seen the idea of a railway line returning to Halstead anywhere online, nor have I discussed this idea in person. I was bored enough to actually write a letter to my local MP about this idea (alongside another more grandiose railway idea going through Halstead I have), but have yet to recieve a response.
 
Last edited:
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

stevieinselby

Established Member
Joined
6 Jan 2013
Messages
1,657
Location
Selby
Without wanting to sound like I'm pouring cold water on your idea, realistically I can't see any prospect of it coming to fruition.
Halstead is a small town of only 15,000 people.
The only town of a similar size that has had a railway reopening (other than as intermediate stations on a line connecting bigger towns) is Okehampton, and that already had an extant, active track in place.
Every other reopening that has involved any level of track infrastructure has been to serve significantly larger populations, and in most cases the track or at least the trackbed was still in situ.
Building a brand new line from Braintree through Halstead to Sudbury on a completely greenfield route, with Halstead being the only realistic opportunity for a station, would be an extraordinarily extravagant project for such a small potential ridership. The connection to Sudbury is a bit of a red herring, as Sudbury already has a railway and through journeys to anywhere except Braintree would remain quicker via Marks Tey.

It would be a far better use of money to fund an express bus from Halstead to Braintree station timed to connect with the hourly train service, which I'm sure you could cover the costs of the service for 50 years for less than you would spend just on a consultation on the railway line, let alone construction.

If Halstead were to get a station then I think it would be much more likely to be a new line from Colchester to Cambridge, shadowing the original route via Halstead, Hedingham and Haverhill – this would connect considerably more people to the rail network (Haverhill is about twice the size of Halstead), as well as providing a new route connecting two important regional centres – and it could potentially reuse some of the original trackbed, in order to reduce costs. The connection to Cambridge as a rapidly growing centre for employment would be important, although it may be at the expense of a slightly slower or less convenient service to London. But I do stress the "if" ... it's incredibly unlikely that such a route would be prioritised for public expenditure when you look at how long it can take to get new stations built and the rigmarole that other lines have gone through to be reopened.

If you want to create a fantasy line then by all means we can talk about what we would like to do with such a route ... but if you are looking at a serious proposal for implementation then I'm afraid you're going to be disappointed.
 

Magdalia

Established Member
Joined
1 Jan 2022
Messages
7,291
Location
The Fens
It would be a far better use of money to fund an express bus from Halstead to Braintree station timed to connect with the hourly train service, which I'm sure you could cover the costs of the service for 50 years for less than you would spend just on a consultation on the railway line, let alone construction.
I agree with this.

Furthermore, devolution offers a way to achieve it. An Essex Mayor could deliver a Braintree-Halstead bus service, linked to the trains, as part of bus franchising. Although Sudbury is in Suffolk, it is only just over the border, so an Essex Mayor could extend the bus service to Sudbury too.

I was bored enough to actually write a letter to my local MP about this idea
I suggest that, if you want better public transport for Halstead, then your letter writing efforts would be better directed towards getting a Mayor for Essex who will opt for bus franchising.
 

RT4038

Established Member
Joined
22 Feb 2014
Messages
5,444
Without wanting to sound like I'm pouring cold water on your idea, realistically I can't see any prospect of it coming to fruition.
Halstead is a small town of only 15,000 people.
The only town of a similar size that has had a railway reopening (other than as intermediate stations on a line connecting bigger towns) is Okehampton, and that already had an extant, active track in place.
Every other reopening that has involved any level of track infrastructure has been to serve significantly larger populations, and in most cases the track or at least the trackbed was still in situ.
Building a brand new line from Braintree through Halstead to Sudbury on a completely greenfield route, with Halstead being the only realistic opportunity for a station, would be an extraordinarily extravagant project for such a small potential ridership. The connection to Sudbury is a bit of a red herring, as Sudbury already has a railway and through journeys to anywhere except Braintree would remain quicker via Marks Tey.

It would be a far better use of money to fund an express bus from Halstead to Braintree station timed to connect with the hourly train service, which I'm sure you could cover the costs of the service for 50 years for less than you would spend just on a consultation on the railway line, let alone construction.

If Halstead were to get a station then I think it would be much more likely to be a new line from Colchester to Cambridge, shadowing the original route via Halstead, Hedingham and Haverhill – this would connect considerably more people to the rail network (Haverhill is about twice the size of Halstead), as well as providing a new route connecting two important regional centres – and it could potentially reuse some of the original trackbed, in order to reduce costs. The connection to Cambridge as a rapidly growing centre for employment would be important, although it may be at the expense of a slightly slower or less convenient service to London. But I do stress the "if" ... it's incredibly unlikely that such a route would be prioritised for public expenditure when you look at how long it can take to get new stations built and the rigmarole that other lines have gone through to be reopened.

If you want to create a fantasy line then by all means we can talk about what we would like to do with such a route ... but if you are looking at a serious proposal for implementation then I'm afraid you're going to be disappointed.

An option to get a railway might be to build 100,000 houses at Halstead ?
 

SynthD

Established Member
Joined
4 Apr 2020
Messages
2,014
Location
UK
An option to get a railway might be to build 100,000 houses at Halstead ?
A circle of 8km centred on Halstead has 33k people. Adding 10x that is not viable, for fresh water supplies among many other reasons.
 

RT4038

Established Member
Joined
22 Feb 2014
Messages
5,444
A circle of 8km centred on Halstead has 33k people. Adding 10x that is not viable, for fresh water supplies among many other reasons.

As building a railway would not be, without that number.
 

Top