• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

TfL Prosecution - Misuse of Friend's Student Oyster - Rejection Email Received

udit

Member
Joined
4 Jul 2026
Messages
9
Location
UK
Hello everyone,
I am looking for some honest advice regarding a TfL fare evasion matter. I am a Master's student on an international visa, and I am very worried about the impact this will have on my upcoming Graduate Route (PSW) visa application in January 2027 and my future career in the NHS.
The Details:
  • Date of Incident: 7th April 2026
  • The Offence: I used my friend's Student Oyster photocard to pass through the barriers. I am also a student, but I was unemployed and experiencing severe financial hardship.
  • Interaction: My details were taken by a Revenue Protection Inspector.
Current Stage:
I received a verification letter and replied promptly. I admitted the offence fully, apologised, explained my student/financial situation, and explicitly asked for an out-of-court settlement.
I have just received an email response from TfL stating the following:
"Thank you for responding to our letter, your case is now being reviewed and we will contact you in due course. Please make sure you use the correct method of payment for all future travel. We do not settle cases out of court."
My Questions:
  1. Given that TfL explicitly stated "We do not settle cases out of court," does this mean a Single Justice Procedure Notice (SJPN) is 100% guaranteed?
  2. Once the SJPN arrives, do I stand a realistic chance of securing a post-summons out-of-court settlement if I instruct a specialist fare evasion solicitor? Or is TfL taking all photocard misuse cases straight to a conviction regardless?
  3. If it goes to court, will this likely be prosecuted under the TfL Byelaws (non-recordable) or the Regulation of Railways Act 1889 (recordable on the PNC)?
Thank you in advance for your time and guidance.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_3380.jpeg
    IMG_3380.jpeg
    995.1 KB · Views: 37
  • IMG_3376.jpeg
    IMG_3376.jpeg
    845.6 KB · Views: 36
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

udit

Member
Joined
4 Jul 2026
Messages
9
Location
UK
Hello everyone,
I am looking for some honest advice regarding a TfL fare evasion matter. I am a Master's student on an international visa, and I am very worried about the impact this will have on my upcoming Graduate Route (PSW) visa application in January 2027 and my future career in the NHS.
The Details:
  • Date of Incident: 7th April 2026
  • The Offence: I used my friend's Student Oyster photocard to pass through the barriers. I am also a student, but I was unemployed and experiencing severe financial hardship.
  • Interaction: My details were taken by a Revenue Protection Inspector.
Current Stage:
I received a verification letter and replied promptly. I admitted the offence fully, apologised, explained my student/financial situation, and explicitly asked for an out-of-court settlement.
I have just received an email response from TfL stating the following:
"Thank you for responding to our letter, your case is now being reviewed and we will contact you in due course. Please make sure you use the correct method of payment for all future travel. We do not settle cases out of court."
My Questions:
  1. Given that TfL explicitly stated "We do not settle cases out of court," does this mean a Single Justice Procedure Notice (SJPN) is 100% guaranteed?
  2. Once the SJPN arrives, do I stand a realistic chance of securing a post-summons out-of-court settlement if I instruct a specialist fare evasion solicitor? Or is TfL taking all photocard misuse cases straight to a conviction regardless?
  3. If it goes to court, will this likely be prosecuted under the TfL Byelaws (non-recordable) or the Regulation of Railways Act 1889 (recordable on the PNC)?
Thank you in advance for your time and guidance.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_3376.jpeg
    IMG_3376.jpeg
    845.6 KB · Views: 111
  • IMG_3380.jpeg
    IMG_3380.jpeg
    995.1 KB · Views: 108

Elecman

Established Member
Joined
31 Dec 2013
Messages
3,569
Location
Lancashire
TfL take misuse of travel passes very seriously and will nearly always prosecute under thier Byelaws as a straight forward prosecution. They do not as they have told you offer out of court settlements but very occasionally drop the prosecution and issue a written warning, the chances of getting those appear to be increased if you use one of the Solicitors that specialise in railway fare evasion issues. Several are mentioned on this site .
 

Snow1964

Established Member
Joined
7 Oct 2019
Messages
11,030
Location
West Wiltshire
If you are applying for an NHS job that requires Masters level degree, then they are very likely to do an enhanced DBS check, rather than standard DBS (and a check of relevant barred list).

If found guilty in a court for recordable offence will show up on an enhanced check.
 
Last edited:

spotify95

Member
Joined
23 Aug 2020
Messages
299
Location
Northamptonshire
Written warnings for this are possible, but very rarely issued - and usually only given out when people have used a specialist solicitor that deals with fare evasion cases.

If you really must avoid a conviction, you should use the services of a solicitor as soon as possible. Several solicitors have been mentioned on these forums:





These are the 4 solicitors frequently mentioned on these forums.

If you do reply back to TfL you must ask for a warning and have mitigation that aligns with section 8 in the prosecution policy for TfL - reasons to prosecute and reasons not to prosecute.

However - you should be prepared for an SJPN, or a court summons if TfL identify repeated misuse. TfL take this sort of thing very seriously, and by default, prosecute.
 

WesternLancer

Veteran Member
Joined
12 Apr 2019
Messages
14,957
Hello everyone,
I am looking for some honest advice regarding a TfL fare evasion matter. I am a Master's student on an international visa, and I am very worried about the impact this will have on my upcoming Graduate Route (PSW) visa application in January 2027 and my future career in the NHS.
The Details:
  • Date of Incident: 7th April 2026
  • The Offence: I used my friend's Student Oyster photocard to pass through the barriers. I am also a student, but I was unemployed and experiencing severe financial hardship.
  • Interaction: My details were taken by a Revenue Protection Inspector.
Current Stage:
I received a verification letter and replied promptly. I admitted the offence fully, apologised, explained my student/financial situation, and explicitly asked for an out-of-court settlement.
I have just received an email response from TfL stating the following:
"Thank you for responding to our letter, your case is now being reviewed and we will contact you in due course. Please make sure you use the correct method of payment for all future travel. We do not settle cases out of court."
My Questions:
  1. Given that TfL explicitly stated "We do not settle cases out of court," does this mean a Single Justice Procedure Notice (SJPN) is 100% guaranteed?
  2. Once the SJPN arrives, do I stand a realistic chance of securing a post-summons out-of-court settlement if I instruct a specialist fare evasion solicitor? Or is TfL taking all photocard misuse cases straight to a conviction regardless?
  3. If it goes to court, will this likely be prosecuted under the TfL Byelaws (non-recordable) or the Regulation of Railways Act 1889 (recordable on the PNC)?
Thank you in advance for your time and guidance.
There is no out if court settlement options at a later stage with an SJPN annd TfL really. And TfL doesn’t do them anyway.

If you want to minimise risk of a conviction for this for other reasons (eg graduate visa applications) then probably best to get a fares evasion solicitors from the list above. But even then no guarantees.

Seperatly go to see your international students team at your university to ask them confidentially what they believe a conviction for this would do to your prospects for graduate visa application etc. they will likely have a staff me who specialises in this and is likely refit give the relevant immigration advice for that side of things, which people here on the forum can’t do.

Your best chance of avoiding a conviction for what you have done ref fare evasion is a fares evasion specialist solicitor. I’m afraid that might cost you c£800 in legal fees but that’s the consequences of now trying to resolve the consequences of what you have done I’m afraid.
 

AlterEgo

Verified Rep - Wingin' It! Paul Lucas
Joined
30 Dec 2008
Messages
29,197
Location
LBK
If you are applying for an NHS job that requires Masters level degree, then they are very likely to do an enhanced DBS check, rather than standard DBS (and a check of relevant barred list).

If found guilty in a court for recordable offence will show up on an enhanced check.
Bylaws are not recordable, but they may anyway, in certain circumstances, show up on an Enhanced check. That is a separate matter as to one's legal obligation to disclose the conviction; some roles may lawfully demand all criminal history, even spent convictions.
 

udit

Member
Joined
4 Jul 2026
Messages
9
Location
UK
Does your friend know that you were caught using his or her card?
Yes i asked him and it was my first time i tried doing fraud if i was employed i would’ve never done that but now i can’t run from the fact that i must face consequences
 

udit

Member
Joined
4 Jul 2026
Messages
9
Location
UK
Hello everyone,
I am looking for some honest advice regarding a TfL fare evasion matter. I am a Master's student on an international visa, and I am very worried about the impact this will have on my upcoming Graduate Route (PSW) visa application in January 2027 and my future career in the NHS.
The Details:
  • Date of Incident: 7th April 2026
  • The Offence: I used my friend's Student Oyster photocard to pass through the barriers. I am also a student, but I was unemployed and experiencing severe financial hardship.
  • Interaction: My details were taken by a Revenue Protection Inspector.
Current Stage:
I received a verification letter and replied promptly. I admitted the offence fully, apologised, explained my student/financial situation, and explicitly asked for an out-of-court settlement.
I have just received an email response from TfL stating the following:
"Thank you for responding to our letter, your case is now being reviewed and we will contact you in due course. Please make sure you use the correct method of payment for all future travel. We do not settle cases out of court."
My Questions:
  1. Given that TfL explicitly stated "We do not settle cases out of court," does this mean a Single Justice Procedure Notice (SJPN) is 100% guaranteed?
  2. Once the SJPN arrives, do I stand a realistic chance of securing a post-summons out-of-court settlement if I instruct a specialist fare evasion solicitor? Or is TfL taking all photocard misuse cases straight to a conviction regardless?
  3. If it goes to court, will this likely be prosecuted under the TfL Byelaws (non-recordable) or the Regulation of Railways Act 1889 (recordable on the PNC)?
Thank you in advance for your time and guidance.
Update-: i got court result directly shall i pay or go and ask guidance from solicitor ?
 

Haywain

Veteran Member
Joined
3 Feb 2013
Messages
24,501
Update-: i got court result directly shall i pay or go and ask guidance from solicitor ?
It's too late for a solicitor, you have been convicted and you now need to pay. What you have received is, effectively, an invoice.
 

AlterEgo

Verified Rep - Wingin' It! Paul Lucas
Joined
30 Dec 2008
Messages
29,197
Location
LBK
Update-: i got court result directly shall i pay or go and ask guidance from solicitor ?
You have been convicted of a criminal offence and you must pay the fine. If you do not pay it, further proceedings will be brought against you.
 

Puffing Devil

Established Member
Joined
11 Apr 2013
Messages
3,167
Update-: i got court result directly shall i pay or go and ask guidance from solicitor ?

Did you get any paperwork from the court before this notification? That looks like a fine based on a standard, assumed, income.
 

udit

Member
Joined
4 Jul 2026
Messages
9
Location
UK
Did you get any paperwork from the court before this notification? That looks like a fine based on a standard, assumed, income.
No, I did not receive any direct mail. I received this result of court mail. If you are aware, could you please inform me if this result would impact my future job prospects, as I am interested in working in the NHS?
 

MarlowDonkey

Established Member
Joined
4 Apr 2013
Messages
1,826
No, I did not receive any direct mail. I received this result of court mail. If you are aware, could you please inform me if this result would impact my future job prospects, as I am interested in working in the NHS?
I think you should have received a notice of intended prosecution. As it stands you have been convicted of a criminal offence and this would need to disclosed where appropriate on job applications etc.
 

Haywain

Veteran Member
Joined
3 Feb 2013
Messages
24,501
No, I did not receive any direct mail. I received this result of court mail. If you are aware, could you please inform me if this result would impact my future job prospects, as I am interested in working in the NHS?
You would not have received an email, court papers have to be physically served.
 

Puffing Devil

Established Member
Joined
11 Apr 2013
Messages
3,167
No, I did not receive any direct mail. I received this result of court mail. If you are aware, could you please inform me if this result would impact my future job prospects, as I am interested in working in the NHS?

You mentioned a Single Justice Procedure Notice before. If you've not had one and have had nothing else from the court, you can apply to have the result overturned and the process restarted - given you're a student and on a limited income, this would reduce the fine and victim surcharge due. It would also give you the chance to ask for time to pay the financial penalty.

Given your immigration status, we can't really comment on your job opportunities. However, most roles in the NHS require a declaration of convictions and having a record would not be a positive enhancement to any application.
 

AlterEgo

Verified Rep - Wingin' It! Paul Lucas
Joined
30 Dec 2008
Messages
29,197
Location
LBK
Be aware that doing a SD and getting the conviction overturned means, in practice, simply getting convicted again when the process restarts, and the clock restarting on when the conviction becomes spent.
 

udit

Member
Joined
4 Jul 2026
Messages
9
Location
UK
The NHS regularly check current staff. You need to declare it before they see it (NHS myself).
Okay during interviews i will inform them but can that would be an issue for getting a job ?

== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==

In case you hadn't realised, your name is still visible at bottom of document.
Sorted sir

== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==

You would not have received an email, court papers have to be physically served.
I directly received this letter from court

== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==

You mentioned a Single Justice Procedure Notice before. If you've not had one and have had nothing else from the court, you can apply to have the result overturned and the process restarted - given you're a student and on a limited income, this would reduce the fine and victim surcharge due. It would also give you the chance to ask for time to pay the financial penalty.

Given your immigration status, we can't really comment on your job opportunities. However, most roles in the NHS require a declaration of convictions and having a record would not be a positive enhancement to any application.
Do i have to email them or do i need to hire solicitor or this if you can help please.
 
Last edited:

udit

Member
Joined
4 Jul 2026
Messages
9
Location
UK
TfL take misuse of travel passes very seriously and will nearly always prosecute under thier Byelaws as a straight forward prosecution. They do not as they have told you offer out of court settlements but very occasionally drop the prosecution and issue a written warning, the chances of getting those appear to be increased if you use one of the Solicitors that specialise in railway fare evasion issues. Several are mentioned on this site .
Hello sir it happened on bus and not on train would that affect my PSW which i will be applying late this year?
 

udit

Member
Joined
4 Jul 2026
Messages
9
Location
UK
Hello everyone,
I recently posted here about a TfL prosecution and have since looked closely at the official court paperwork I received. It turns out I have already been convicted in my absence at Stratford Magistrates' Court on 16th July 2026.
I am an international Master's student applying for my Graduate Route (PSW) visa in January 2027 and aiming for an NHS career, so I am trying to figure out the safest way forward.
The Exact Charge Wording on the Court Sheet:
"Public service vehicle - passenger use travel mandate issued for another person"
The Penalty Issued:
A total fine/cost of £559.75 to be paid within a 28-day window.
My Situation:
The incident happened on a TfL bus where I used a friend's Student Oyster card. I never received the initial Single Justice Procedure Notice (SJPN) or court summons, which is why this went through in my absence.
My Questions for the Forum Experts:
  1. Because the charge says "Public Service Vehicle", does this confirm it is strictly a TfL Bus Byelaw offence (non-recordable) rather than a Regulation of Railways Act offence?
  2. If it is a non-recordable Byelaw offence, is it safer for my upcoming visa and NHS DBS checks to just pay the £559.75 fine now and close the case?
  3. Or should I file a Statutory Declaration to wipe out this conviction, reset the case to zero, and hire a specialist fare evasion solicitor to try and negotiate an out-of-court settlement with TfL's legal team?
Thank you so much for your continued guidance.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_3945.jpeg
    IMG_3945.jpeg
    1.4 MB · Views: 50

AlterEgo

Verified Rep - Wingin' It! Paul Lucas
Joined
30 Dec 2008
Messages
29,197
Location
LBK
None of us can give you advice on your immigration status I'm afraid.
 

udit

Member
Joined
4 Jul 2026
Messages
9
Location
UK
Hello everyone,
I need some urgent advice regarding a TfL fare evasion matter that happened entirely on a TfL bus.
I have just discovered that I was convicted in my absence at Stratford Magistrates' Court on 16th July 2026. I am an international Master's student at UEL applying for my Graduate Route (PSW) visa in January 2027 and aiming for an NHS career, so I am very anxious about the best way forward.
The Details of the Bus Incident:
  • I used a friend's Student Oyster card on a TfL bus. I am a student too, but I was unemployed and under extreme cost-of-living stress.
  • A bus revenue inspector caught me and took my details.
  • I never received the initial Single Justice Procedure Notice (SJPN) or court summons, which is why the case went through in my absence.
The Exact Charge Wording on the Court Sheet:
"Public service vehicle - passenger use travel mandate issued for another person"
The Penalty Issued:
A total fine/cost of £559.75 to be paid within 28 days.
My Questions for the Forum Experts:
  1. Because this happened on a bus and specifies a "Public Service Vehicle", does this confirm it is strictly a TfL Bus Byelaw offence (non-recordable) rather than a Regulation of Railways Act offence?
  2. Given my upcoming NHS DBS checks and January visa application, is it safer to just pay the £559.75 fine now and close the case?
  3. Or should I file a Statutory Declaration to wipe out this bus conviction, reset the case, and hire a specialist fare evasion solicitor to try and negotiate an out-of-court settlement with TfL's legal team?
Thank you so much for your help.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_3945.jpeg
    IMG_3945.jpeg
    1.4 MB · Views: 33

WesternLancer

Veteran Member
Joined
12 Apr 2019
Messages
14,957
Hello sir it happened on bus and not on train would that affect my PSW which i will be applying late this year?
If it ends up with a guilty verdict from a court it doesn’t make any difference if the offence was committed on a bus or on a tube train or other train aiui.
 

furlong

Established Member
Joined
28 Mar 2013
Messages
5,300
Location
Reading
There's also an intermediate option of asking the court to revisit the fine (but not the conviction) taking into account your current earnings - if you're not earning it should then be a bit lower.

If you're prepared to pay extra for a solicitor to help (cost maybe £600+), you might have a chance of being given a warning instead of prosecution, but there'd be no guarantee. Doing it yourself, you'd be looking at getting character references from tutors and attempting to argue it was out-of-character and prosecution would be an excessive response given your status and intended career.

But first we ought to check the facts - what was the exact financial advantage you gained by using someone else's card instead of having one of your own? Exactly what ticket was involved? A season ticket? A fare cap? Or?

== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==

Ah - I see you have an existing thread where some of those questions were already answered!
 

Egg Centric

Established Member
Joined
6 Oct 2018
Messages
2,822
Location
Land of the Prince Bishops
Hello everyone,
I need some urgent advice regarding a TfL fare evasion matter that happened entirely on a TfL bus.
I have just discovered that I was convicted in my absence at Stratford Magistrates' Court on 16th July 2026. I am an international Master's student at UEL applying for my Graduate Route (PSW) visa in January 2027 and aiming for an NHS career, so I am very anxious about the best way forward.
The Details of the Bus Incident:
  • I used a friend's Student Oyster card on a TfL bus. I am a student too, but I was unemployed and under extreme cost-of-living stress.
  • A bus revenue inspector caught me and took my details.
  • I never received the initial Single Justice Procedure Notice (SJPN) or court summons, which is why the case went through in my absence.
The Exact Charge Wording on the Court Sheet:
"Public service vehicle - passenger use travel mandate issued for another person"
The Penalty Issued:
A total fine/cost of £559.75 to be paid within 28 days.
My Questions for the Forum Experts:
  1. Because this happened on a bus and specifies a "Public Service Vehicle", does this confirm it is strictly a TfL Bus Byelaw offence (non-recordable) rather than a Regulation of Railways Act offence?
  2. Given my upcoming NHS DBS checks and January visa application, is it safer to just pay the £559.75 fine now and close the case?
  3. Or should I file a Statutory Declaration to wipe out this bus conviction, reset the case, and hire a specialist fare evasion solicitor to try and negotiate an out-of-court settlement with TfL's legal team?
Thank you so much for your help.

1. Definitely not RORA
2. Forum rules prevent answering
3. You can have a free consultation with a solicitor to answer this.

A general point which I'm almost certain won't apply to the NHS but will to sloppier employers - if you have it cancelled by a stat dec then as you await a retrial you could truthfully answer "no" to a question phrased like "Have you any criminal convictions?". Again I wojld expect the NHS to have much smarter worded questions than that which bring the truth out... but just something to think about.
 

JBuchananGB

Established Member
Joined
30 Jan 2017
Messages
1,397
Location
Southport
Although this has been through the court system without your knowledge, and you could use a Statutory Declaration to have it reset and have the case dealt with again, the fees you might pay to a specialist solicitor would likely be more than the amount which you now owe, you will almost certainly be found guilty again, and will have to pay the same penalties and costs etc. anyway.
Pragmatically it might be the best to pay the amount required and move on. No one here can comment on what effect that might have on any of your future prospects, other than that it is always proper to declare the conviction to anyone who wants to know. It is usually worse not to declare such things and for the relevant body to find it out for themselves.
 

Top