• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Sadiq Khan says future of Heathrow Express should be ‘reconsidered’ due to Elizabeth line success

Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

JonathanH

Veteran Member
Joined
29 May 2011
Messages
23,264
Rebuilding Wharncliffe Viaduct doesn't look like it will encroach on any residential property
How could the space for running lines be increased though? It would almost certainly require construction of a new viaduct to one side, which doesn't come cheap and may detract from the Grade I listing.

Hanwell station is a Grade II listed building as well.
 

zwk500

Veteran Member
Joined
20 Jan 2020
Messages
18,415
Location
Northampton
Rebuilding Wharncliffe Viaduct doesn't look like it will encroach on any residential property
Take a closer look at both ends, and adjust your expectations for what the construction will be (maybe compare the HS2 trace to it's final corridor).

Adding a 5th line to the north of Hanwell station will definitely impact the back gardens of the adjoining properties. They go right up to the base of the existing railway embankment.
 

HSTEd

Veteran Member
Joined
14 Jul 2011
Messages
20,270
You might be able to build a single track tunnel for freight trains relatively cheaply.

How would the regulator view the safety requirements for a freight only tunnel? At most one person in the tunnel at once, possibly none at all if the locomotive is fitted with ATO?
 

MarkyT

Established Member
Joined
20 May 2012
Messages
7,550
Location
Torbay
Here's my 6 tracking idea. From West to East:
Magenta, Stockley Park - Southall, widening on surface.
Yellow, Southall yard. Massive Reading style flyover for mains over connection from Reliefs to south side. Brentford branch doubled throughout with new connections to:
1. Piccadilly Line alignment, taking over 2 of the 4 tracks to South Ealing where a new tunnel (orange -approx 2km) leads to Acton yard. Freights, diversion, some GWR semi fasts use this.
2. SWR line to Waterloo, joining at Brentford. An alternative routing for Airtrack from Waterloo and Clapham Junction. Could be combined with western link services to Thames and Kennet Valley via Heathrow to limit trains reversing in the airport complex (HEX would be extended via southern link, to Woking and beyond, and Crossrail to Staines).
1784548914248.png
1784552930531.png
 
Last edited:

NCT

Established Member
Joined
18 Apr 2025
Messages
2,140
Location
London
I'd be very surprised that any of the politickers over Heathrow Express had any additional infrastructure, let alone its funding model, in their minds.
 

JonathanH

Veteran Member
Joined
29 May 2011
Messages
23,264
Here's my 6 tracking idea. From West to East:
Magenta, Stockley Park - Southall, widening on surface.
Yellow, Southall yard. Massive Reading style flyover for mains over connection from Reliefs to south side. Brentford branch doubled throughout with new connections to:
1. Piccadilly Line alignment, taking over 2 of the 4 tracks to South Ealing where a new tunnel (orange -approx 2km) leads to Acton yard. Freights, diversion, some GWR semi fasts use this.
2. SWR line to Waterloo, joining at Brentford. An alternative routing for Airtrack from Waterloo and Clapham Junction. Could be combined with western link services to Thames and Kennet Valley via Heathrow to limit trains reversing in the airport complex (HEX would be extended via southern link, to Woking and beyond, and Crossrail to Staines).
View attachment 207963
View attachment 207964
That is certainly a novel use of existing corridors, and moves away from the approach of bulldozing Hanwell station.
 

Mr. SW

Member
Joined
13 Sep 2023
Messages
527
Location
Armchair
As a one-time resident of west London I find all these suggestions for the GWML gently amusing.
 

anthony263

Established Member
Joined
19 Aug 2008
Messages
6,891
Location
South Wales
Should just leave the heathrow express as it is however when new lines are built to heathrow airport such as the western link it should be extended
 

cle

Established Member
Joined
17 Nov 2010
Messages
5,610
I can't see much potential within the current footprint - other than - no more freight during daytime...

Maybe some incremental extensions beyond OOC (Hayes bay or LHR) if pathable. More use of the freight fifth line. But not really many.

Other than that, it's a fast lines tunnel from west of OOC to west of Slough.

Much like the Victoria/SE tunnel idea (fast tunnel from Battersea ish, to split somewhere to serve East Croydon and Bromley South - and for fasts) - or a SWML one - there isn't much left.

And for me, I will always prioritize increasing intra-London services so anything to get more suburban services to uniform metro frequencies is going to be more impactful and equitable. And enable more development where people want to be. No-one is going to build massive developments in Godalming or Gerrards Cross - or the other extremely well-served smaller commuter places.
 

Tetchytyke

Veteran Member
Joined
12 Sep 2013
Messages
17,450
Location
Isle of Man
I take the Elizabeth Line to Heathrow now. The now redundant Heathrow Express would release paths for other services for sure.

Ironically it’s still quite well used. I can’t see it ending any time soon.
The issue with Heathrow Express is fares. Elizabeth Line fares are included in capping or the Travelcard, Heathrow Express fares are not. Whilst the single fare to Paddington isn't so very different between Heathrow Express and Elizabeth Line, with EL you've already effectively paid for your day's travel in London and with HEx you haven't.

Simply charge the same fare on Heathrow Express as you do on Elizabeth Line and my expectation/opinion is that most people who currently take EL from Heathrow would transfer to HEx. I know I would.
 

NSEWonderer

Established Member
Joined
5 Dec 2020
Messages
2,899
Location
London
The thing with HEX is it was setup to compete with other more expensive modes of travel to Heathrow from London, its quite often packaged in deals for foreign tourists aswell as simpler to understand and use for most that I've seen. The luggage space alone can be a issue on a packed Elizabeth line train vs that of a Hex train which has more suitable facilities. Whilst HEX is very niche it still has its benefits and a lot of people I know usually package the cost of it when planning their trip just for peace of mind when traveling. The elizabeth line fully replacing Hex would be arguably a poor idea as the train itself is too multimodal to replace a simple service in HEX.
 

Wolfie

Established Member
Joined
17 Aug 2010
Messages
7,394
The issue with Heathrow Express is fares. Elizabeth Line fares are included in capping or the Travelcard, Heathrow Express fares are not. Whilst the single fare to Paddington isn't so very different between Heathrow Express and Elizabeth Line, with EL you've already effectively paid for your day's travel in London and with HEx you haven't.

Simply charge the same fare on Heathrow Express as you do on Elizabeth Line and my expectation/opinion is that most people who currently take EL from Heathrow would transfer to HEx. I know I would.
I can see zero prospect of either Heathrow Express fares being dropped to match those on the Elizabeth line or indeed Heathrow Express being included in fare capping.

There is nothing in that for BAA.
 

Tetchytyke

Veteran Member
Joined
12 Sep 2013
Messages
17,450
Location
Isle of Man
There is nothing in that for BAA.
Their desire for a third runway gives the Mayor and the government a lot of leverage over BAA.

Something will have to change, in my opinion. HEx passenger numbers are tanking but Elizabeth Line services are already overcrowded west of Paddington. Airport passengers need to be directed towards the dedicated airport trains rather than the overcrowded commuter trains, but the current fare structure directs them away from the dedicated airport trains.

I'd agree that I don't see BAA willingly giving up HEx. Even with the tanking passenger numbers it is still making them money.
 

Wolfie

Established Member
Joined
17 Aug 2010
Messages
7,394
Pedantic point - it's not BAA anymore - it's Heathrow Airport Holdings Ltd. :)
Fair point well made.

== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==

Their desire for a third runway gives the Mayor and the government a lot of leverage over BAA.

Something will have to change, in my opinion. HEx passenger numbers are tanking but Elizabeth Line services are already overcrowded west of Paddington. Airport passengers need to be directed towards the dedicated airport trains rather than the overcrowded commuter trains, but the current fare structure directs them away from the dedicated airport trains.

I'd agree that I don't see BAA willingly giving up HEx. Even with the tanking passenger numbers it is still making them money.
Perhaps, when the current Heathrow Express operating licence expires, TfL or Network Rail could buy the railway infrastructure built and owned by Heathrow. Then they will have absolute freedom to decide what should operate.
 

dosxuk

Established Member
Joined
2 Jan 2011
Messages
2,429
Something will have to change, in my opinion. HEx passenger numbers are tanking but Elizabeth Line services are already overcrowded west of Paddington. Airport passengers need to be directed towards the dedicated airport trains rather than the overcrowded commuter trains, but the current fare structure directs them away from the dedicated airport trains.
TfL might say that they should just take over all the trains, HAA might say that TfL should just put up their airport premium.
 

JonathanH

Veteran Member
Joined
29 May 2011
Messages
23,264
Perhaps, when the current Heathrow Express operating licence expires, TfL or Network Rail could buy the railway infrastructure built and owned by Heathrow. Then they will have absolute freedom to decide what should operate.
Which is unrealistic of course because it is unlikely to be for sale, and even if it was would be a very poor use of, ultimately, taxpayer money. Is there any way of identifying the value of the Heathrow branch? I would assume it runs into multi billions.

It surely has to be easier for TfL to explore running additional trains to Hayes & Harlington or West Drayton to deal with overcrowding in West London, rather than Heathrow.
 

AlexSJW

On Moderation
Joined
3 Feb 2026
Messages
192
Location
London
Their desire for a third runway gives the Mayor and the government a lot of leverage over BAA.
The third runway will be Birmingham airport once HS2 from OOC is operational. One of the reasons HS2 was pushed and and phase 1 was kept. Journey time from Old Oak C to Birmingham airport will be around 32 minutes. Same as Gatwick Express.
Heathrow Express from Paddington is 15 mins direct to Heathrow Terminals 2 & 3, 21 minutes direct to Heathrow Terminal 5.

Elizabeth line from The City to Heathrow is 33 to 38 minutes if departing from Farringdon, 40 to 44 minutes if departing from London Liverpool Street
 

Top