Rebuilding Wharncliffe Viaduct doesn't look like it will encroach on any residential propertyAnd Wharncliffe viaduct?
Rebuilding Wharncliffe Viaduct doesn't look like it will encroach on any residential propertyAnd Wharncliffe viaduct?
How could the space for running lines be increased though? It would almost certainly require construction of a new viaduct to one side, which doesn't come cheap and may detract from the Grade I listing.Rebuilding Wharncliffe Viaduct doesn't look like it will encroach on any residential property
Take a closer look at both ends, and adjust your expectations for what the construction will be (maybe compare the HS2 trace to it's final corridor).Rebuilding Wharncliffe Viaduct doesn't look like it will encroach on any residential property


That is certainly a novel use of existing corridors, and moves away from the approach of bulldozing Hanwell station.Here's my 6 tracking idea. From West to East:
Magenta, Stockley Park - Southall, widening on surface.
Yellow, Southall yard. Massive Reading style flyover for mains over connection from Reliefs to south side. Brentford branch doubled throughout with new connections to:
1. Piccadilly Line alignment, taking over 2 of the 4 tracks to South Ealing where a new tunnel (orange -approx 2km) leads to Acton yard. Freights, diversion, some GWR semi fasts use this.
2. SWR line to Waterloo, joining at Brentford. An alternative routing for Airtrack from Waterloo and Clapham Junction. Could be combined with western link services to Thames and Kennet Valley via Heathrow to limit trains reversing in the airport complex (HEX would be extended via southern link, to Woking and beyond, and Crossrail to Staines).
View attachment 207963
View attachment 207964
I take the Elizabeth Line to Heathrow now. The now redundant Heathrow Express would release paths for other services for sure.
The issue with Heathrow Express is fares. Elizabeth Line fares are included in capping or the Travelcard, Heathrow Express fares are not. Whilst the single fare to Paddington isn't so very different between Heathrow Express and Elizabeth Line, with EL you've already effectively paid for your day's travel in London and with HEx you haven't.Ironically it’s still quite well used. I can’t see it ending any time soon.
I can see zero prospect of either Heathrow Express fares being dropped to match those on the Elizabeth line or indeed Heathrow Express being included in fare capping.The issue with Heathrow Express is fares. Elizabeth Line fares are included in capping or the Travelcard, Heathrow Express fares are not. Whilst the single fare to Paddington isn't so very different between Heathrow Express and Elizabeth Line, with EL you've already effectively paid for your day's travel in London and with HEx you haven't.
Simply charge the same fare on Heathrow Express as you do on Elizabeth Line and my expectation/opinion is that most people who currently take EL from Heathrow would transfer to HEx. I know I would.
Their desire for a third runway gives the Mayor and the government a lot of leverage over BAA.There is nothing in that for BAA.

Fair point well made.Pedantic point - it's not BAA anymore - it's Heathrow Airport Holdings Ltd.![]()
Perhaps, when the current Heathrow Express operating licence expires, TfL or Network Rail could buy the railway infrastructure built and owned by Heathrow. Then they will have absolute freedom to decide what should operate.Their desire for a third runway gives the Mayor and the government a lot of leverage over BAA.
Something will have to change, in my opinion. HEx passenger numbers are tanking but Elizabeth Line services are already overcrowded west of Paddington. Airport passengers need to be directed towards the dedicated airport trains rather than the overcrowded commuter trains, but the current fare structure directs them away from the dedicated airport trains.
I'd agree that I don't see BAA willingly giving up HEx. Even with the tanking passenger numbers it is still making them money.
TfL might say that they should just take over all the trains, HAA might say that TfL should just put up their airport premium.Something will have to change, in my opinion. HEx passenger numbers are tanking but Elizabeth Line services are already overcrowded west of Paddington. Airport passengers need to be directed towards the dedicated airport trains rather than the overcrowded commuter trains, but the current fare structure directs them away from the dedicated airport trains.
Which is unrealistic of course because it is unlikely to be for sale, and even if it was would be a very poor use of, ultimately, taxpayer money. Is there any way of identifying the value of the Heathrow branch? I would assume it runs into multi billions.Perhaps, when the current Heathrow Express operating licence expires, TfL or Network Rail could buy the railway infrastructure built and owned by Heathrow. Then they will have absolute freedom to decide what should operate.
The third runway will be Birmingham airport once HS2 from OOC is operational. One of the reasons HS2 was pushed and and phase 1 was kept. Journey time from Old Oak C to Birmingham airport will be around 32 minutes. Same as Gatwick Express.Their desire for a third runway gives the Mayor and the government a lot of leverage over BAA.