Merseyrail to be brought back under public control: what improvements/changes may result?

Djgr · 18 Jul 2026

According to the Liverpool Echo:

www.liverpoolecho.co.uk/news/liverpool-news/merseyrail-brought-back-under-public-34309954.amp

it has been agreed that Liverpool City Region will take direct responsibility when the current concession ends in 2028.

Trains across the Liverpool City Region will be brought back into public control in two years following a landmark move by Merseyside leaders. When the current Merseyrail concession ends in 2028, the city region’s combined authority (CA) will take over the operation which would allow decisions to be made on services at a local level.

RailUK Forums

Starmill · 18 Jul 2026

An interesting turn of phrase. It's hard to point to any point in Merseyrail's history when it hasn't been almost entirely under 'public control'.

Djgr · 18 Jul 2026

Starmill said:
An interesting turn of phrase. It's hard to point to any point in Merseyrail's history when it hasn't been almost entirely under 'public control'.

It's basically telling Serco and Transport UK group to skedaddle.

LNW-GW Joint · 18 Jul 2026

They will need a new leadership team to replace Serco/Transport UK in 2028.

Unlike a DfT franchise there is no established public sector operator (DFTO) to step in.
Will Stadler continue to run the depots/maintain the trains? Will GBR (ex-NR) continue to own/maintain the network?

This will have been the longest private TOC contract in the UK - 25 years 2003-28, albeit at concession level.

TfL is continuing with its private concession policy, for now (for London Overground and Elizabeth Line services).

Farigiraf · 18 Jul 2026

Djgr said:
According to the Liverpool Echo:

(www.liverpoolecho.co.uk/news/liverpool-news/merseyrail-brought-back-under-public-34309954.amp)

it has been agreed that Liverpool City Region will take direct responsibility when the current concession ends in 2028.

Trains across the Liverpool City Region will be brought back into public control in two years following a landmark move by Merseyside leaders. When the current Merseyrail concession ends in 2028, the city region’s combined authority (CA) will take over the operation which would allow decisions to be made on services at a local level.

What's actually likely to change from a passenger perspective?

Merseytravel will be renamed to the memorable and catchy TfLCR, and trains will be operated in-house rather than contracted out to Serco and Transport UK. How that will translate to the running of trains, I don't know.

From existing similar operations, we can see that it's certainly a mixed bag - on one hand you have the successful London Underground and Edinburgh Trams (albeit both seem to be struggling with finances at the moment), but then you also have the Blackpool Trams which are fully dependent on how much the council can budget for its running (which is often very little).

So I'm guessing that Merseyrail will thrive if the Liverpool City Region is willing to support its growth, but it may get worse if it's not properly funded and invested in. Based on the fact that the LCR won't even pay for trams and is instead opting for overpriced articulated buses, I'm sceptical about how well it'll do (to some extent), but I recognise that in theory it can do really well without the need of Serco/Transport UK.

Djgr · 18 Jul 2026

Farigiraf said:
What's actually likely to change from a passenger perspective?

Merseytravel will be renamed to the memorable and catchy TfLCR, and trains will be operated in-house rather than contracted out to Serco and Transport UK. How that will translate to the running of trains, I don't know.

From existing similar operations, we can see that it's certainly a mixed bag - on one hand you have the successful London Underground and Edinburgh Trams (albeit both seem to be struggling with finances at the moment), but then you also have the Blackpool Trams which are fully dependent on how much the council can budget for its running (which is often very little).

So I'm guessing that Merseyrail will thrive if the Liverpool City Region is willing to support its growth, but it may get worse if it's not properly funded and invested in. Based on the fact that the LCR won't even pay for trams and is instead opting for overpriced articulated buses, I'm sceptical about how well it'll do (to some extent), but I recognise that in theory it can do really well without the need of Serco/Transport UK.

Well one difference will be the fares regime, which is currently determined by the concession holder. This leads to some very "interesting" peak time and single fares. It is also likely to lead to the demise of one of my bugbears; the super cynical ScamSa... sorry DaySaver.

Starmill · 18 Jul 2026

Djgr said:
It's basically telling Serco and Transport UK group to skedaddle.

Indeed. It's just an in-housing at expiry. Same as the T&W Metro did in 2017.

== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: 18 Jul 2026 ==

Djgr said:
Well one difference will be the fares regime, which is currently determined by the concession holder.

I'm not sure that's the case...

Mikey C · 18 Jul 2026

LNW-GW Joint said:
TfL is continuing with its private concession policy, for now (for London Overground and Elizabeth Line services).

TfL have full control over the Overground, Liz, DLR and buses, even if a private operator operates the actual services.

Indeed, I imagine a lot of Londoners don't even realise that private companies are operating their service, as it's so tightly controlled by TfL.

Djgr · 18 Jul 2026

Starmill said:
Indeed. It's just an in-housing at expiry. Same as the T&W Metro did in 2017.

== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: 18 Jul 2026 ==

I'm not sure that's the case...

They take the "revenue risk" and hence they determine basic fare structure

https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200304/cmselect/cmtran/145/145wec09.htm

"We believe that in the new situation whereby the revenue risk has transferred to the operator and is no longer with Merseytravel as it was before,.."

Starmill · 18 Jul 2026

Djgr said:
They take the "revenue risk" and hence they determine basic fare structure

https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200304/cmselect/cmtran/145/145wec09.htm

"We believe that in the new situation whereby the revenue risk has transferred to the operator and is no longer with Merseytravel as it was before,.."

I don't think that's what that says. The Combined Authority retains very strict control over ticket prices.

Sorcerer · 18 Jul 2026

I'm not completely against Merseyrail being brought back into public ownership, and in fact I'm supportive of it being ran by the local authorities rather than a Whitehall body. But why must the passenger transport executive be renamed from Merseytravel, already an established name that works, to Transport for Liverpool City Region with it's awkward abbreviation? London-style naming won't bring London quality.

Kite159 · 18 Jul 2026

Will anything meaningful change from an operator run under TUK/Serco as a concession to an operator run directly by the body formerly known as Merseytravel?

Djgr · 18 Jul 2026

Starmill said:
I don't think that's what that says. The Combined Authority retains very strict control over ticket prices.

Okay I understand this better now.

Perhaps it is better to say that Merseyrail and its private owners' requirement for profit is currently a consideration for the Combined Authority fare policy and this would cease to be the case.

StephenHunter · 18 Jul 2026

Djgr said:
Okay I understand this better now.

Perhaps it is better to say that Merseyrail and its private owners' requirement for profit is currently a consideration for the Combined Authority fare policy and this would cease to be the case.

Being replaced with the combined authority's requirement to make the service pay its way, or at least not require huge subsidy.

Starmill · 18 Jul 2026

The franchisee fees they're allowed to take are quite small. Against that there will be a big cost to set up for in house operations. There is also the avoided cost of running a competition to offset too.

Djgr · 18 Jul 2026

StephenHunter said:
Being replaced with the combined authority's requirement to make the service pay its way, or at least not require huge subsidy.

Do you have any evidence for this?

StephenHunter · 18 Jul 2026

Djgr said:
Do you have any evidence for this?

The entire history of British Rail?

Djgr · 18 Jul 2026

Starmill said:
The franchisee fees they're allowed to take are quite small. Against that there will be a big cost to set up for in house operations. There is also the avoided cost of running a competition to offset too

The additional upfront costs are probably covered by the ongoing reduced annual costs. Insourcing should also improve control and reduce complexity.

== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: 18 Jul 2026 ==

StephenHunter said:
The entire history of British Rail?

This insourcing on its own has no relevance to the overall level of UK funding provided to transport.

Starmill · 19 Jul 2026

Djgr said:
This insourcing on its own has no relevance to the overall level of UK funding provided to transport.

The problem is that the Combined Authority is not in a financially sustainable position to make additional spending decisions on Merseyrail, and the central government is obviously doing its best to reduce subsidy as a top priority. In that context I would expect everything to roll over much as today rather than improving.

Djgr · 19 Jul 2026

Starmill said:
The problem is that the Combined Authority is not in a financially sustainable position to make additional spending decisions on Merseyrail, and the central government is obviously doing its best to reduce subsidy as a top priority. In that context I would expect everything to roll over much as today rather than improving.

Whilst this might be true in the short term, it is difficult to see what the private sector operators actually bring to the table.

Goldfish62 · 19 Jul 2026

Farigiraf said:
What's actually likely to change from a passenger perspective?

Merseytravel will be renamed to the memorable and catchy TfLCR

TfLCR is the public transport authority. The public transport network in Greater Manchester isn't called TfGM.

Given that the franchised bus network in the LCR will be called Metro I would suggest that Merseyrail may also come under that banner. "Metrobus" and "Metrorail"?

Djgr · 19 Jul 2026

Goldfish62 said:
TfLCR is the public transport authority. The public transport network in Greater Manchester isn't called TfGM.

Given that the franchised bus network in the LCR will be called Metro I would suggest that Merseyrail may also come under that banner. "Metrobus" and "Metrorail"?

Not forgetting the MetroCard

Northerngirl · 19 Jul 2026

I just hope there is finally some coherency with fairs, its far to convoluted for a 'metro'

AntoniC · 19 Jul 2026

Djgr said:
Not forgetting the MetroCard

I find the Metro card bery useful - mind you I only have to wait 2 months to get my Senior Citizen card when I get to 60

StephenHunter · 19 Jul 2026

Starmill said:
The problem is that the Combined Authority is not in a financially sustainable position to make additional spending decisions on Merseyrail, and the central government is obviously doing its best to reduce subsidy as a top priority. In that context I would expect everything to roll over much as today rather than improving.

Rome didn't burn down in a day after all.

Djgr · 19 Jul 2026

AntoniC said:
I find the Metro card bery useful - mind you I only have to wait 2 months to get my Senior Citizen card when I get to 60

Well you will find that this is issued as a MetroCard.

== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: 19 Jul 2026 ==

Northerngirl said:
I just hope there is finally some coherency with fairs, its far to convoluted for a 'metro'

Fun fairs?

waveyswirley · 19 Jul 2026

I presume this will help facilitate a daily/weekly fare cap across both bus and rail?

Djgr · 19 Jul 2026

waveyswirley said:
I presume this will help facilitate a daily/weekly fare cap across both bus and rail?

For the most part, there already effectively is, through the use of Saveaways (daily) and Trio (weekly) tickets.

The only bit not currently covered is daily morning peak travel Monday to Friday.

On the positive side the above tickets do also include the Mersey Ferries.

Watershed · 19 Jul 2026

Djgr said:
For the most part, there already effectively is, through the use of Saveaways (daily) and Trio (weekly) tickets.

The only bit not currently covered is daily morning peak travel Monday to Friday.

On the positive side the above tickets do also include the Mersey Ferries.

Given that for a substantial proportion of commuters, a bus then a train or vice versa is the most convenient way of making their journey, that is a rather large omission.

Djgr · 19 Jul 2026

Watershed said:
Given that for a substantial proportion of commuters, a bus then a train or vice versa is the most convenient way of making their journey, that is a rather large omission.

Indeed, and presumably regular commuters would purchase Trio tickets.

But clearly if you are trying to develop integrated public transport, where it doesn't matter whether the train is painted blue or green, or whether the transport has tyres or not, then you need better fares integration.

And this will be easier to achieve the more control you have and the fewer parties (who may have different objectives) are involved.

Merseyrail to be brought back under public control: what improvements/changes may result?

Established Member

RailUK Forums

Veteran Member

Established Member

Veteran Member

Member

Established Member

Veteran Member

Established Member

Established Member

Veteran Member

Established Member

Veteran Member

Established Member

Established Member

Veteran Member

Established Member

Established Member

Established Member

Veteran Member

Established Member

Veteran Member

Established Member

Attachments

Member

Member

Established Member

Established Member

Member

Established Member

Veteran Member

Established Member