• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Hauts-de-France contract won by SNCF voyageurs

riceuten

Member
Joined
23 May 2018
Messages
957
The benefits of an open competition for service provision include:
  • A service definition based on needs rather than what the monopoly incumbent operator is prepared to agree to
  • Transparency regarding service subsidy levels
  • Defined penalties for failing to deliver on the contract
  • Market pressure should costs be unreasonably high
Of course, I do realise that all of this is seen with extreme scepticism by most Brits, who would prefer a permanent stated owned monopoly.
Skepticism because it doesn't work. We had many decades of private sector monopoly incumbent operator that delivered a worse service at a higher cost. Penalties were just passed on to farepayers. There is no "market pressure" in any meaningful sense of the word
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

The exile

Established Member
Joined
31 Mar 2010
Messages
9,490
Location
Somerset
What I'm trying to say is this: Hauts-de-France could have, if it wanted to, set up its own train company to run their TER services instead of tendering out (but they didn't), and that would have been fine under EU law. That's in response to the claim that the EU forced them to tender the services out.
Is the contract really less than 500K km per year? That’s less tgan 2000km per day which doesn’t sound very much unless you’re talking a very small network indeed.
 

U-Bahnfreund

Member
Joined
6 Feb 2015
Messages
560
Location
Germany
Is the contract really less than 500K km per year? That’s less tgan 2000km per day which doesn’t sound very much unless you’re talking a very small network indeed.
The 500,000 km/year limit from article 5 subsection 4 is a different exception, it refers to a direct award to any kind of company (i.e. also private companies). The in-house contract from article 5 subsection 2 that I'm referring to doesn't have a km limit.
 

Top