• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Bus stops on country roads that have no visible markings that they exist

JKP

Member
Joined
3 Jan 2023
Messages
723
Location
SE Scotland
On the legality of that - not entirely sure. If one or both buses were open platform, then almost certainly not. If they were all buses that could have been run 'one person operated' then probably OK - think I've read this was standard practice with some 'express' services (e.g. Lancashire towns - Blackpool) where it was done by some of the larger companies, and think there was an agreement that one conductor could do X number of buses.




Some of the guidance is / was open to interpretation and has changed over time - and a lot of the initial NAPTAN surveys (now getting on for 25 years ago) were farmed out to contractors whose accuracy was not always great.


And yes - it's a failing of the system that while marked / unmarked stops are (in theory) identified in the data, I've yet to see any journey planner tell the public this. I think hail + ride stops should have the 'hail and ride' as part of the stop name, though.

Then there's stops that become 'custom' because the bus stop flag falls down / gets lost when lamp posts are renewed, and councils don't have the resources to go round checking these things proactively. Sometimes a passenger or bus operator will report it, sometimes they won't.



I thought 'hail and ride' should be included as part of the stop name where it happens. Again, this may be a bit of guidance that's changed over time.



Yes.



I am aware of a couple of incidents in rural areas - one where a bus service was increased from one bus a week to a few a day with BSIP funding. Some local residents were most unhappy about this, and there were occasions where cars were parked legally but in a way that made it impossible for the bus to get through. And a week or so later the (wooden) bus shelter that had been there since there had been a more regular service, caught fire in mysterious circumstances.

And another somewhere else rural where 'unmarked' bus stops were replaced with bus stop posts complete with bus stop flag, timetable case and timetable. Some months later when there was a timetable change, it was found that all the new bus stop posts had gone missing.
I recall 50 years ago an independent whose route shared a conductor between the two coaches required on busy days.

Hutchings and Cornelius used single deck vehicles on their Taunton route so sharing a conductor between them would not be a problem.

I compiled a NapTAN database and do not recall ever including Hail and Ride in the naming of a custom or virtual stop.
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

GoneSouth

Established Member
Joined
17 Dec 2018
Messages
1,474
This is the ridicul
On the legality of that - not entirely sure. If one or both buses were open platform, then almost certainly not. If they were all buses that could have been run 'one person operated' then probably OK - think I've read this was standard practice with some 'express' services (e.g. Lancashire towns - Blackpool) where it was done by some of the larger companies, and think there was an agreement that one conductor could do X number of buses.




Some of the guidance is / was open to interpretation and has changed over time - and a lot of the initial NAPTAN surveys (now getting on for 25 years ago) were farmed out to contractors whose accuracy was not always great.


And yes - it's a failing of the system that while marked / unmarked stops are (in theory) identified in the data, I've yet to see any journey planner tell the public this. I think hail + ride stops should have the 'hail and ride' as part of the stop name, though.

Then there's stops that become 'custom' because the bus stop flag falls down / gets lost when lamp posts are renewed, and councils don't have the resources to go round checking these things proactively. Sometimes a passenger or bus operator will report it, sometimes they won't.



I thought 'hail and ride' should be included as part of the stop name where it happens. Again, this may be a bit of guidance that's changed over time.



Yes.



I am aware of a couple of incidents in rural areas - one where a bus service was increased from one bus a week to a few a day with BSIP funding. Some local residents were most unhappy about this, and there were occasions where cars were parked legally but in a way that made it impossible for the bus to get through. And a week or so later the (wooden) bus shelter that had been there since there had been a more regular service, caught fire in mysterious circumstances.

And another somewhere else rural where 'unmarked' bus stops were replaced with bus stop posts complete with bus stop flag, timetable case and timetable. Some months later when there was a timetable change, it was found that all the new bus stop posts had gone missing.
I feel embarrassed to be British when I read (all too often) incidents like this. Spiteful, small minded, selfish individuals. May their cars all spontaneously combust! Morons
 

Farigiraf

Member
Joined
23 Jul 2023
Messages
1,149
Location
Bridge on the River Cam
Some local residents were most unhappy about this, and there were occasions where cars were parked legally but in a way that made it impossible for the bus to get through. And a week or so later the (wooden) bus shelter that had been there since there had been a more regular service, caught fire in mysterious circumstances.
Why on earth would having 2-3 extra buses run through a village upset some of the residents that much?
 

mangad

Member
Joined
20 Jun 2014
Messages
712
Location
Stockport
Why on earth would having 2-3 extra buses run through a village upset some of the residents that much?
More often than not, it's related to fear of loss of parking and that the buses will cause "traffic chaos".

TfL once tried to re-route a bus down a road near me and the residents put up such a stink that they ended up giving up. The planned half hourly service would cause traffic chaos apparently. Oh and two parking spaces would have been lost so they went on the war path.

One of them came to my front door with a petition. I pointed out the petition had several accuracies on it and was based on wrong information. So they left and went next door.

Facts and reality don't always play much of a part in the thinking. I would put money on someone being convinced a bus stop would lower their house price too!
 

MotCO

Established Member
Joined
25 Aug 2014
Messages
6,086
One of them came to my front door with a petition. I pointed out the petition had several accuracies on it and was based on wrong information. So they left and went next door.
Typo?
 

Taunton

Veteran Member
Joined
1 Aug 2013
Messages
12,226
On the legality of that - not entirely sure. If one or both buses were open platform, then almost certainly not. If they were all buses that could have been run 'one person operated' then probably OK - think I've read this was standard practice with some 'express' services (e.g. Lancashire towns - Blackpool) where it was done by some of the larger companies, and think there was an agreement that one conductor could do X number of buses.
By this time they were buses with doors at the front. The duplicate one was generally an old Bedford coach with the door a couple of seat rows back. Sometimes the driver would stop, put the handbrake on, and get up to it, but by then the passengers had probably slid it open it and got out themselves, and the more reliable ones would have closed it up again, properly. There were other aspects. Sometimes if short staffed the bus would be driven by the mechanic, in overalls (who probably knew more about handling it than any other employee). Sometimes no conductor at all, but the driver would issue tickets themselves, hand held, walking down the bus at one or two key stops. I don't think they would ever drive past someone with their hand out.

We are in danger of applying city bus methods to inappropriate areas, on the "one size fits all" approach which bureaucracy loves for making the regulations simple.
 

TheGrandWazoo

Veteran Member
Joined
18 Feb 2013
Messages
22,867
Location
Somerset with international travel (e.g. across th
We are in danger of applying city bus methods to inappropriate areas, on the "one size fits all" approach which bureaucracy loves for making the regulations simple.
I think more accurately, there are some posters who just don't know what it's like. Not wishing to sound like some Farmer Palmer "you don't knowz the wayz of the cundrysoide" type character but as someone who has lived in some rural locations, some of the fear and anxiety is just not justified.

We're talking about having to have pull in laybys, marked stops etc at every farm gate and road end and to solve what problems? This isn't a hot topic that has been troubling the best minds in the UK.

I was in one of my old stomping grounds yesterday, driving along the Fosse Way from Cirencester to Wellesbourne. Between Cirencester and Bourton, the only place where there's formal stops is within Northleach, and none to Bourton (where there's more stops), one stop between Bourton and Stow, and then nothing to Moreton - it's always been like that and Gloucestershire CC is not averse to putting in stops. Just the frequency of use vs cost and legal requirements just isn't worth it.
 

ricoblade

Member
Joined
28 Sep 2015
Messages
539
Why on earth would having 2-3 extra buses run through a village upset some of the residents that much?
Never underestimate villagers' fury! There's one village round here in North Notts where the bus stop is right outside someone's house (the house fronts directly onto the narrow road) but some of the drivers pull in further up the road as the residents complain about buses stopping outside their house!
 

Taunton

Veteran Member
Joined
1 Aug 2013
Messages
12,226
Never underestimate villagers' fury! There's one village round here in North Notts where the bus stop is right outside someone's house (the house fronts directly onto the narrow road) but some of the drivers pull in further up the road as the residents complain about buses stopping outside their house!
Double deckers stopping outside people's houses and the passengers looking straight into bedrooms have long been an issue ...
 

geoffk

On Moderation
Joined
4 Aug 2010
Messages
3,927
Location
Exeter
large parts of rural north wales just has BWS painted on the road and nothing else so unless you knew that was the welsh for bus you wouldn't have a clue :D
On my (only) visit to Guernsey last year and travelling around by bus, I saw a number of stops like this, with BUS painted on the carriageway or footway and often hard to spot. In rural areas there was often no footway and once I had the choice of standing in the road or in someone's front garden. Here in Devon we seem well provided with marked bus stops in rural areas, often with route numbers on the flag. I've noted one or two unmarked ones where drivers stop through custom and practice.
 

TheGrandWazoo

Veteran Member
Joined
18 Feb 2013
Messages
22,867
Location
Somerset with international travel (e.g. across th
Never underestimate villagers' fury! There's one village round here in North Notts where the bus stop is right outside someone's house (the house fronts directly onto the narrow road) but some of the drivers pull in further up the road as the residents complain about buses stopping outside their house!
Exactly.

Also the fact that when people buy a house, some seem to think that they also have a defacto claim on the road outside in which to park their car!
 

Acathater

Member
Joined
11 Dec 2025
Messages
676
Location
NorthWest
As can heavy electric buses going over speed bumps and speed tables, both old and new houses.
new houses tend to have gardens or driveways, or at a bare minimum pavements between the house and the road.
Ancient village housing often does not, the houses open directly onto the road
 

AdamWW

Established Member
Joined
6 Nov 2012
Messages
5,903
I had a bit of fun some years ago trying to find a bus stop on Holy Island. Having walked there, I was somewhat in the dark as to where the bus went from, and it's really not a bus that you want to miss.

Of course someone was happy to tell me where to stand and fortunately they were right.

And on the subject of buses on causeways I had to enlist help to find a bus stop having arrived at St Margaret's Hope on Orkney by ferry. Sitting at the front upstairs on an Enviro 400 going across the Churchill Barriers was one of the more entertaining bus journeys I've done.
 

NorthernSpirit

Established Member
Joined
21 Jun 2013
Messages
2,274
I've been trying for years to get a physical bus stop fitted at the Eccup Reservoir stop, Harrogate bound, on the A61 between Alwoodley and Harewood in West Yorkshire, as well as the stop opposite towards Leeds made safer (it's on a bit of mud/grass with trees blocking it's view on the road) but West Yorkshire Combined Authority say both are not well used.

I use the Harrogate bound stop once to twice a month, sometimes more often, and used to use the Leeds bound stop but it's become too dangerous to use, so now I have to walk even further from work up to Alwoodley Gates. Regarding the Harrogate bound stop, I've had many a driver ask me where the bus stop is when I've rang the bell, and some are so unsure they even drop me at the end of the lane for Eccup Reservoir which is handy lol.

I'm not the only user as a colleague also uses this stop once or twice a week (he walks up to Alwoodley Gates for the return bus) and I've known some colleagues in the past who used it daily until they got sick of the 36 driving past it lol. As a side note, a good few years back one of those colleagues ended up really late for work, the driver refused to acknowledge his protests that the Eccup stop existed as it wasn't physically there and dropped him off at Wikefield Farm. There is no roadside footpath back to the Eccup turnoff, so he took his chances and decided to follow what looked like a path through fields, eventually he ended up on the Emmerdale set lol.
I don't suppose a couple of "borrowed" temporary stops could be plonked at the unmarked Eccup stops, a couple of South Yorkshire ones will do since they're often springing up in West Yorkshire.
 

Ballyheigue

Member
Joined
11 Sep 2025
Messages
316
Location
Leeds
I had a bit of fun some years ago trying to find a bus stop on Holy Island. Having walked there, I was somewhat in the dark as to where the bus went from, and it's really not a bus that you want to miss.

Of course someone was happy to tell me where to stand and fortunately they were right.

And on the subject of buses on causeways I had to enlist help to find a bus stop having arrived at St Margaret's Hope on Orkney by ferry. Sitting at the front upstairs on an Enviro 400 going across the Churchill Barriers was one of the more entertaining bus journeys I've done.
You managed to walk to Holy Island without getting run over on the road or sinking in the sands? I've heard the warning that the walk over the sands is a no go unless you know where to step and tried the road but gave up as it looked too narrow in parts for 2 passing cars, never mind a human on top lol
 

Magrar

On Moderation
Joined
20 Jun 2026
Messages
195
Location
Reading
Rather a lot of hyperbole here. 'seriously disturbing part' of something that happens the length and breadth of the land, outside of urban areas. The roads are not race tracks. They are not designed for all vehicles to be travelling at the maximum permitted speed. Any driver has to drive within their length of sight and be prepared to stop for any unexpected obstruction. 'an accident waiting to happen' - well, if there is an obstruction (such as a bus stopped to pick up or set down passengers, or a broken down vehicle, or a slow agricultural or heavy goods vehicle turning into a farmyard) then the approaching driver must slow down and be prepared to stop. If they are travelling too fast for the conditions and they collide with said obstruction it will be their fault (and likely, if colliding with a bus, they will come off worse). The legal position would be that the moving vehicle colliding with the stationary vehicle is liable.
I do not think there is a large number of accidents to buses or waiting passengers in rural areas in the scenario you mention. Far more of impatient drivers overtaking standing and/or moving buses and HGV's in inappropriate places/traffic conditions; entirely the impatient drivers' fault - it is they who are the 'accident waiting to happen'
'This madness' is entirely an issue of money. Who is going to pay for the installation of laybys, road signage etc of probably tens of thousands of rural bus stops each used by a few passengers a day? What other Council function do you suggest is cut, so budget can be transferred for such an endeavour? Which Politician is going to go for this?
I can only remind you the scenario described is not remotely typical, either of rural England or rural hazards.

The legal position is clear for the council. Hence why we seem to find plenty of money for signs and markings in other scenarios, even for stationary hazards which no driver should ever hit.

But the risks are so obvious here, to anyone who is familiar with children, cars and buses, that you would have to be an utter lunatic to allow your child to use it.
Kids living on a farm will likely face much bigger hazards on the farm itself. They're likely to have used the road on numerous occasions, possibly on bikes, horses or tractors (if they're old enough), and will be well aware of any dangers it poses; thousands of farm-dwelling bairns up and down the land will also have done so for generations!


A bus driver who covers a route regularly will get to know their passengers and where they board and alight. Didn't you say that the route is only served by two buses a day on "seemingly school routes"? It's likely that a driver will know where to stop, both when picking up and dropping off.


We are talking about people who: a) have to pass a test in order to be qualified to drive the bus in the first place; b) have to hold a CPC (Certificate of Professional Competence) before they can drive one for a living and; c) will more than likely have had some kind of route training before being sent out on their own.

I travelled to school on a regular service bus for six years, along a B-class road that has a couple of long straight sections. I can think of three or four locations along that route where people used to board and alight with no marked stops. In those days people weren't even expected to stick their arms out; the fact that they were standing where they were was a clear indication that they wanted to catch the bus. The bus approaches the unmarked stop, the driver slows down and uses their indicators to signal that they're stopping. Other drivers should then be aware that there are pedestrians in the area who may or not have seen them and should act accordingly. Are there hazards involved? Of course there are, but there are also hazards in towns and cities when using marked bus stops.

To make one final point, the fact that a stop appears to only serve one or two dwellings is meaningless. People in rural areas who use public transport will often have to walk or cycle a considerable distance to get to their nearest stop. One of my classmates had over a mile to go to catch the bus; he simply chained his bike up in the woods by the stop and left it there all day. I did once read a story about a farmer who'd take his pony and trap down to the road end when he wanted to take the bus into town. He'd then send the pony back to the farm with the empty trap and it would would be waiting patiently for him on the return journey!

It's just part of rural life and catching a bus around here isn't rocket science! :)
I can only remind you as above, the scenario I descrice is not remotely typical to rural England or rural harards.

This is not a B road. It is a heavily trafficked two way unmarked lane. And given the speed of that traffic, mostly cars, you would have to be a complete fool to let your kids cycle or ride a horse along it.

Whoever else lived in that farm over the generations, I guarantee they never had to contend with risks like all electric SUVs.

Likely the only reason the single other legal means of getting to the farm, is a random bridleway which ends at the farm, is precisely to avoid having to ride on that lane.

Nobody else needs to use this stop. Nobody is walking or cycling there. Why would you? There are proper bus stops in the villages in both directions on this lane, and no dwellings any closer than that.

And I can virtually guarantee these routes do not have regular drivers. Both the routes are run by the major groups, and the buses last used are not from the schools fleet.

There was certainly no sign there is any usual standing place in the verge or gravel that married with a place a heavy bus is stopping four times a day.

That can only because of how obvious it is to anyone, even a country dweller, you'd have to be a certified moron to let your kids use this virtual bus stop, such are the clear and obvious risks. So no buses are likely stopping at all.

It's probably the safest thing for everyone concerned that the farmer could probably care less there is a virtual bus stop serving this farm, he probably gets his kids to school by car, or a taxi that he permits use of his gravel layby, and there's no other reason anyone would be looking it up.

I certainly only became aware of it for a non-bus travel related reason.
 

GusB

Established Member
Joined
9 Jul 2016
Messages
8,114
Location
Elginshire
I can only remind you the scenario described is not remotely typical, either of rural England or rural hazards.
Would you mind posting the Google Streeview link so that we might have a look for ourselves and decide whether or not it's typical?

This is not a B road. It is a heavily trafficked two way unmarked lane. And given the speed of that traffic, mostly cars, you would have to be a complete fool to let your kids cycle or ride a horse along it.
What sort of speeds are we talking about here? Assuming that the National Speed Limit applies, traffic should be going no faster than 60mph. Furthermore, most considerate drivers will slow down when they encounter slower-moving traffic such as cycles or horses.

Whoever else lived in that farm over the generations, I guarantee they never had to contend with risks like all electric SUVs.
All electric SUVs, oh my! While they might be a relatively recent phenomenon, we've had Range Rovers since the 70s.

Likely the only reason the single other legal means of getting to the farm, is a random bridleway which ends at the farm, is precisely to avoid having to ride on that lane.
I very much doubt that a bridleway, so named because it would have been used by horses in the days before mechanised transport, would have been created purely to avoid having to ride on the lane!

Nobody else needs to use this stop. Nobody is walking or cycling there. Why would you? There are proper bus stops in the villages in both directions on this lane, and no dwellings any closer than that.
As I explained in my post, just because there isn't an obvious cluster of houses in the immediate vicinity doesn't mean that nobody uses the stop. People who live in the countryside may often have to travel for a mile or more in order to catch a bus.

And I can virtually guarantee these routes do not have regular drivers. Both the routes are run by the major groups, and the buses last used are not from the schools fleet.
How can you make such a guarantee? Do you use those bus routes? Even the major groups can have regular drivers on the route; it may not be the same driver at the same time each day, but it's likely that they'll work a rota that means they'll eventually do a turn on the route. Also, buses do not have to belong to a dedicate schools fleet in order to convey schoolchildren.

There was certainly no sign there is any usual standing place in the verge or gravel that married with a place a heavy bus is stopping four times a day.
There don't have to be any road markings, bus stop flags or any other visible clues. Passengers wishing to board a bus will stand at the road end and make themselves known to the driver as it approaches. What's so special about this particular location that makes it any different to any other unmarked rural stop?

That can only because of how obvious it is to anyone, even a country dweller, you'd have to be a certified moron to let your kids use this virtual bus stop, such are the clear and obvious risks. So no buses are likely stopping at all.
Any kids living in the countryside should already be aware of those clear and obvious risks and will have had it drummed into them from a very early age that they need to be careful. As I previously mentioned, if they're living on the farm then the likelihood is that they'll face far bigger dangers on the farm itself (chemicals, machinery, cattle etc.).

It's probably the safest thing for everyone concerned that the farmer could probably care less there is a virtual bus stop serving this farm, he probably gets his kids to school by car, or a taxi that he permits use of his gravel layby, and there's no other reason anyone would be looking it up.

I certainly only became aware of it for a non-bus travel related reason.
A farmer may be too busy doing farmery things to take their kids to school, and why would they when there's a perfectly usable school bus that stops right at the end of the farm road? Depending on how far away the farm is from the school, the transport may even be free.

The situation you describe is perfectly normal and you're reading far more into it than there needs to be.
 

TheGrandWazoo

Veteran Member
Joined
18 Feb 2013
Messages
22,867
Location
Somerset with international travel (e.g. across th
I have to side with @GusB on this one.

I'd ask @Magrar - where's the evidence that this is a problem? Where are the cases that school kids are being knocked down waiting for buses in this scenario? Where are the school buses being struck when stationery?

I was brought up in a rural area. I live in one now. I see schoolkids waiting patiently at road ends and farm gates even on 60 mph roads.

As I explained in my post, just because there isn't an obvious cluster of houses in the immediate vicinity doesn't mean that nobody uses the stop. People who live in the countryside may often have to travel for a mile or more in order to catch a bus.
Exactly. My local bus has a listed stop - no markings, no refuge, no flag - at a crossroads on a national speed limit road. That said, you'd not be doing 60 mph there. There are no houses... until you walk down one of the lanes and there's a farm and 6 cottages in a hollow.


As an aside, prompted by @GusB, I remember bumping into my dad in town. He suggested I have a trip out with him up the dales on his bus. Near the top of the dale, I looked out and saw a school friend driving a tractor in a field, harvesting hay in a pasture. He and me would've been 14! It is a different life on a farm!!
 

JKP

Member
Joined
3 Jan 2023
Messages
723
Location
SE Scotland
I would add that on a local authority school contract that it is parental responsibility until the child boards the vehicle and from when the child alights in the afternoon. It is up to the parent or guardian if the child uses the school transport provided.

I have been on an inter urban bus service today where we stopped three times on National speed limit roads. The first time was to set down two walkers at a stop marked by a bus shelter and hard standing, opposite the road end of a very small village; second time to pick up a young couple at a village road end at an unmarked stop other than a wooden bench on banking and the third time at an unmarked stop opposite a caravan site where again a young couple were waiting. This time there was a wide farm track which our driver carefully manoeuvred the e200 34 seat bus into so that he was as far off the carriageway as possible (there is a slight bend at this location). The first two stops were on the carriageway. Rural bus drivers are used to such situations and I cannot see it changing anytime soon.

The bus stop I boarded at was in a town but parked cars prohibited the bus pulling in to the kerb. The driver simply put on the hazard warning lights and effectively blocked the road whilst I boarded and scanned my pass.
 
Last edited:

GusB

Established Member
Joined
9 Jul 2016
Messages
8,114
Location
Elginshire
As an aside, prompted by @GusB, I remember bumping into my dad in town. He suggested I have a trip out with him up the dales on his bus. Near the top of the dale, I looked out and saw a school friend driving a tractor in a field, harvesting hay in a pasture. He and me would've been 14! It is a different life on a farm!!
Indeed, it's legal for children of 13 and over to drive low-powered tractors on a farm, although they're not supposed to drive on the road until 16. I've never heard of this rule being broken, ever - honest, guv!

As another aside, I've found the source for the for my earlier anecdote about the farmer and his pony:
Alex [Hay] also recalls, whilst driving the Forres to Elgin service on Fridays, arriving at Dallas at 9.55 a.m. To catch the bus Mr McEwan, who farmed Auchness, used to come down through the fields with his pony and trap. At the gate he would take off the reins and turn the pony and it would go home itself. At 3.15 p.m. the pony and trap would be waiting for his return from Elgin. Very well trained indeed.

The source is Our Buses Past and Present by Sammy Fraser, a former inspector who worked from Elgin depot. Sadly, the Elgin to Forres route via Dallas and the man who told the tale are distant memories.

I suppose it may seem unusual to those of a more urban persuasion, but most rural bus stops like this will have been used for decades. While it's more or less essential to have your own transport when you live in the sticks these days, much of the rural traffic would have been farm labourers who simply would have been unable to afford cars of their own. In many ways it is a very different world.
 

TheGrandWazoo

Veteran Member
Joined
18 Feb 2013
Messages
22,867
Location
Somerset with international travel (e.g. across th
I suppose it may seem unusual to those of a more urban persuasion, but most rural bus stops like this will have been used for decades.
Indeed - it may seem alien to folk from cities or who believe in formality and fixed infrastructure but these have been used for decades as you say, and with little or no issues.

While it's more or less essential to have your own transport when you live in the sticks these days, much of the rural traffic would have been farm labourers who simply would have been unable to afford cars of their own. In many ways it is a very different world.
The other thing from my youth would be a load of little old ladies (tartan shopping trolley, plastic headscarf) who would struggle to climb aboard a Bristol LH. They'd never learnt to drive so had to get the bus. The numbers are quite startling - in 1975, just 29% of women had a driving license but by 1998, it was 61%.
 

JLUK144

Member
Joined
8 Sep 2017
Messages
94
Location
Glasgow
I came across an interesting example of this whilst spending a week in the East Neuk. The local bus between Leven and St Andrews serves all the towns and villages such as Kilconquhar. The express service to and from Edinburgh sticks to the main road and bypasses Kilconquhar. Or so I thought. After further investigation, I discovered on Google Maps a pair of stops (one in each direction, of course) at a crossroads with the A917 and two small lanes - one for Kilconquhar and the other for the Shell Bay holiday park - with confirmation of the timetable from BusTimes and Stagecoach’s own website.

IMG_4512.png IMG_4519.png IMG_4511.png

This sounds great and what’s it got to do with this thread I hear you say, well, the conundrum is that when you check Google’s Streetview, you see no evidence of any bus stops at all. Furthermore, with it being at a crossroads and the bendy nature of the road, I can’t see how a bus can safely stop.

IMG_4517.png IMG_4518.png

IMG_4513.png IMG_4514.png

IMG_4515.png IMG_4516.png
 

GusB

Established Member
Joined
9 Jul 2016
Messages
8,114
Location
Elginshire
This sounds great and what’s it got to do with this thread I hear you say, well, the conundrum is that when you check Google’s Streetview, you see no evidence of any bus stops at all. Furthermore, with it being at a crossroads and the bendy nature of the road, I can’t see how a bus can safely stop.
There is no conundrum. If someone wishes to board or alight, the bus simply stops. If it's unsafe to pass a stationary bus at that location, don't attempt to pass it - just wait until the bus is ready to set off again. The same situation would apply in an urban setting where there's a marked bus stop but no lay-by; if it's unsafe to pass for whatever reason (parked cars, poor visibility etc.), don't.
 

JKP

Member
Joined
3 Jan 2023
Messages
723
Location
SE Scotland
In two of the photographs it looks as though the bus could draw in to the mouth of the joining road to pick up and set down passengers with the driver putting on the hazard warning lights to warn other road users.
 

The exile

Established Member
Joined
31 Mar 2010
Messages
9,322
Location
Somerset
Facts and reality don't always play much of a part in the thinking. I would put money on someone being convinced a bus stop would lower their house price too!
Having a bus service will almost certainly raise it. Being the house with the bus stop outside will probably lower it (litter, people staring in etc).
 

Magrar

On Moderation
Joined
20 Jun 2026
Messages
195
Location
Reading
Would you mind posting the Google Streeview link so that we might have a look for ourselves and decide whether or not it's typical?


What sort of speeds are we talking about here? Assuming that the National Speed Limit applies, traffic should be going no faster than 60mph. Furthermore, most considerate drivers will slow down when they encounter slower-moving traffic such as cycles or horses.


All electric SUVs, oh my! While they might be a relatively recent phenomenon, we've had Range Rovers since the 70s.


I very much doubt that a bridleway, so named because it would have been used by horses in the days before mechanised transport, would have been created purely to avoid having to ride on the lane!


As I explained in my post, just because there isn't an obvious cluster of houses in the immediate vicinity doesn't mean that nobody uses the stop. People who live in the countryside may often have to travel for a mile or more in order to catch a bus.


How can you make such a guarantee? Do you use those bus routes? Even the major groups can have regular drivers on the route; it may not be the same driver at the same time each day, but it's likely that they'll work a rota that means they'll eventually do a turn on the route. Also, buses do not have to belong to a dedicate schools fleet in order to convey schoolchildren.


There don't have to be any road markings, bus stop flags or any other visible clues. Passengers wishing to board a bus will stand at the road end and make themselves known to the driver as it approaches. What's so special about this particular location that makes it any different to any other unmarked rural stop?


Any kids living in the countryside should already be aware of those clear and obvious risks and will have had it drummed into them from a very early age that they need to be careful. As I previously mentioned, if they're living on the farm then the likelihood is that they'll face far bigger dangers on the farm itself (chemicals, machinery, cattle etc.).


A farmer may be too busy doing farmery things to take their kids to school, and why would they when there's a perfectly usable school bus that stops right at the end of the farm road? Depending on how far away the farm is from the school, the transport may even be free.

The situation you describe is perfectly normal and you're reading far more into it than there needs to be.
I have to side with @GusB on this one.

I'd ask @Magrar - where's the evidence that this is a problem? Where are the cases that school kids are being knocked down waiting for buses in this scenario? Where are the school buses being struck when stationery?

I was brought up in a rural area. I live in one now. I see schoolkids waiting patiently at road ends and farm gates even on 60 mph roads.


Exactly. My local bus has a listed stop - no markings, no refuge, no flag - at a crossroads on a national speed limit road. That said, you'd not be doing 60 mph there. There are no houses... until you walk down one of the lanes and there's a farm and 6 cottages in a hollow.


As an aside, prompted by @GusB, I remember bumping into my dad in town. He suggested I have a trip out with him up the dales on his bus. Near the top of the dale, I looked out and saw a school friend driving a tractor in a field, harvesting hay in a pasture. He and me would've been 14! It is a different life on a farm!!
I'd rather not reveal the location as we're potentially discussing the parenting decisions of an identifiable individual. But it's clear to me you're both not giving due weight to the specific situation here, namely the risks of this site and the times we live in.

Other than being a lane with a farm on, this is by no means the country or a rural area. There's a large city just 5 miles away, the nearest bus depots and their operations reflect this being just 500m from a Metropolitan Borough. The nature, frequency and behavior of the traffic reflects that. It is a rat run basically.

Being an experienced motorist, including vans and modern electric SUVs (diimensions and performance), a keen cyclist, and familiar with horse riding children, and old enough to have seen and known proper rural types in proper rural areas, I know for a fact you would not use this lane in anything but a motor vehicle. It's just too dangerous.

The site location and approaches are very unusual. It's clear the straight and layby were all created for the farm, which sits right next to the lane, which follows a natural ridgeline. This allows safe use by trucks to park and cars or farm vehicles to make simple left/right turns into/off the lane. Nohing more dangerous is needed, it has ample space in and behind the shed.

Even if a truck was parked up, absent the usual signs of imminent activity, even the safest drivers would feel quite happy approaching this straight at upwards of 40 mph, and once free of the villages and windy sightlines, think nothing of taking this opportunity to speed up, however brief.

If the layby were empty, there are plenty of scenarios where you would not even bother to slow down if a vehicle was travelling slowly or even stopped in the other lane, on this straight. Nor would you think twice about overtaking a similar vehicle in your lane.

Of all the things you would be thinking here, either when choosing your speed, or passing/overtaking, the potential presence of children in the road is not one of them. Or at least as low down the priority list as a suicidal badger.

It's also clear to any half way experienced driver that this stretch of lane is neither accessible (or desirable) to any animal large enough to cause you a serious issue. It's clearly an arable not livestock farm. You'd be in default mode - weather/light, surface, sight lines, blowout/mechanical failure. And that's an attentive hazard focused driver.

You'd see the shed in good time, but as I noted on streetview, when the doors are closed, it looks almost like it could be a disused (but not dillapidated) building. The shed is far enough back that when I passed on the farm side when its doors were open, it did not make me change my mind about what the biggest risk was at that moment - the idiot tailgating me.

The farmhouse is far harder to see, and in one direction at least, won't be visible in time to do anything about the thought it might mean children live there and so might do things like catch buses from invisible bus stops.

Not even a bus stopped in the road, even with indicators on, would immediately make you think MIND THAT CHILD. It would make you think, what's that silly sod doing, or there's another broken down bus.

It's not an absolute certainty that every car would fail to stop before striking a child, having not seen them early enough, or been travelling too fast, or just not being mentally prepared. We are talking 300m at the shorter side from stop to curve.

But look at how far out they warn you to slow down when approaching a roundabout on a long stretch of dual carriageway with sightlines of miles, and you get the idea of the physics of worst case scenarios. Time. Distance. Options. The boffins know it's as much if not more about driver awareness and processing time, as it is the physics of braking.

For a pretty featureless section of straight lane, if there are multiple vehicles and the potential for bus stop use, all of a sudden there are lots of different things you should be thinking about, and lots of different directions to be looking. At speed.

There's even a scenario here where the presence of a view opening up after some distance of classic tree lined no line painted running, but on the opposite side of the road to the hazard (the farm), could cost valuable moments.

There is no safe place to stand in the lane. That's what you're not appreciating here. The lane really is that tightly bordered by hedges, bushes and uneven high verge, to make standing in it for even a minute, a risk not worth taking.

There are only two places that are identifiable "locations" in the sense you say kids/drivers use rural stops, somewhere knowable, a gate or junction, where you can stand a little off the road. One is the corner of the farm entrance nearest the farmhouse, for buses on the farm side of the road, or a field gate for the opposite side.

These are dangerous for many reasons. In both cases, you can't be seen by oncoming traffic. And you are at the entirely wrong end of the straight, meaning you have little time to see or hear an approaching bus and decide if it's safe to make your presence known by literally stepping into the lane.

Even if you can signal, you are asking the bus driver to make a split second decision, or travel dangerously slowly. And if they overshoot, in both cases, you're in for an interesting choice, risking either squeezing down the nearside or walking around the far side, to board. The farm gate entrance is steeply sloped and (probably for that reason) surfaced with cobbles. Made for standing on, it is not.

This all leaves the safest, yet wierdest, place you should choose to stand/stop. The middle of the layby, using this shed side for both sides. It's wierd, just standing in the middle of the side of 100 foot long shed. And you are technically trespassing.

But you can see the oncoming traffic, and bus drivers can see you in good time, but can also stop in the safest place from the perspective of other traffic. It is certainly the safest option for far side boarding/alighting, given the need to probably slightly encroach the (invisible) median with your bus so the kid can physically get on/off.

And of course, that assumes the shed doors are closed and nobody is parked in the layby. If it's not, that opens up a whole can of worms regarding where the bus driver should be looking or what the child should be doing.

I'd say that without the farmer's cooperation, and even with it, there's no safe way to use this stop, even if you did the sensible thing and painted bays, a SLOW, and put a flag on the shed. I'd say the only reason there isn't any sign this has been the location of a tragedy, is that it isn't being used.

If a kid had been hit here, the place would look much different. That's sadly how it works, but until I saw this nightmare, I had assumed we no longer did that. That we were proactive now.

We can't even be sure there are children at the farm of course. But given where it is, I see no reason why they would be rural wise, much less steeped in generations of farming.

I could see this farm being a satellite, the farmhouse sold to other occupants. Whether or not they are the farmer's kids, the schools they go to will be by a vast majority, attended by city kids. So wearing, doing or acting in any way different, would not be wise.

I looked up the bridleway on streetview, and was unsurprised to see it's not for horses at all, it's a gated rough farm track, used presumably to allow the farmer to access a plantation to the south, and a wood beyond.

Funnily enough there is a "school" further along the bridleway, but like I said, by the time you get that far from this farm and its virtual bus stop, you're as close to the villages and their real stops via other routes. And as its remote location suggests, it's a special school. You'd never get risk assessment clearance for a horse trek up the bridleway, let alone onto the lane.

The dangerous nature of the lane is surely why that site is now served by a modern looking private road, a full 1km long. But since it still emerges onto the lane 200m from one of the villages (because of a wood) I noted with amusement that even this junction was served with official bus stops.

Only flags on poles, but with safe places to stand, and while not ideal (buses still stopping in the traffic lane in a tree lined curving road) there is far more space between the road and the the trees/shrubs, so it's far easier to assess on approach, and you'd be going slower by default. The junction is wide and clear, showing the risks it was designed with in mind, despite being a simple rural affair in its immediate locale. Fast moving frequent traffic.

In conclusion therefore, any council that put this farmer into the position where he had to either choose between making his kids use this bus stop, or not go to school, is asking to be sued. Or at the very least, compensate him for doing the only sensible thing and ensuring his kids stand in the middle of his layby, and he suspends all farm business for the duration of their arrivals and departures. A nice little earner.
 

Top