Peter Mugridge
Veteran Member
Presumably this deal covers the entire fleet of 350/2s?
They don't have quick door opening cycle, so much better suited to longer semi-fast services with fewer station calls, than ones with closely spaced stations where doors open every 2-3 minutesPlease remind me why they would be no good for theWigan NW to Stalybridge route?
They don't have quick door opening cycle, so much better suited to semi-fast services, than ones with closely spaced stations where doors open every 2-3 minutes
Presumably if talking late next year, they mean by December 2027 timetable change.Does this mean a reshuffle, with 331s being moved to routes like Hadfield and Wigan, or will some 323s be retained?
IMO, it would be better if more 150s were replaced before the 323sPresumably if talking late next year, they mean by December 2027 timetable change.
Weren't some more sections of new electrification supposed to be switched on by then, which presumably allows some services to switch from diesel, so going to have to be some sort of cascade of stock anyway.
There's nothing to replace the 150s with at the moment and probably wont be until Northern get the new trains ordered and into serviceIMO, it would be better if more 150s were replaced before the 323s
Yes, weird how slow the doors are to open, when the doors on other plug door fitted stock are so much faster. But decent trains.They don't have quick door opening cycle, so much better suited to longer semi-fast services with fewer station calls, than ones with closely spaced stations where doors open every 2-3 minutes
Replacing the 150s with 350s might be mathematically more satisfying but they wouldn't get very far on those routes. Yes, the 150s do urgently need to be replaced but there isn't a surplus of DMUs available. The 350s are available to replace the 323s without going through any new build process, so it would be churlish to turn them down just because the 150s can't be replaced in the same timescale.IMO, it would be better if more 150s were replaced before the 323s
Excellent news, looking forward to using them!Internal brief just gone out confirming Class 350s replacing 323s at Northern. Expected late next year with use on the South Manchester routes
Apparently the 34 Class 323s will be replaced with 37 Class 350s. Given that 350s are a bit longer and there will be a few more of them, that means a reasonable increase in capacity.Northern has received government approval to replace its class 323s with 37 Porterbrook owned class 350s. The fleet will receive a £25M refurb and the first five will enter service late next year.
first 5 come into service late next year. they need to be refurbished first and crew training to take place as Northern haven't operate them before.Excellent news, looking forward to using them!
Does "Expected late next year" mean they'll enter service or be in full service by then? If the former, why does it take 18 months to introduce trains that are not awaiting to be cascaded? Are they planning on repainting/refurbing them before introduction perhaps?
Seems a long period but given anything that gets stored aka 175s these days appears to suffer many problems when they put them back in traffic best be cautious.first 5 come into service late next year. they need to be refurbished first and crew training to take place as Northern haven't operate them before.
Chime Whistle Publishing on X
Apparently the 34 Class 323s will be replaced with 37 Class 350s. Given that 350s are a bit longer and there will be a few more of them, that means a reasonable increase in capacity.
Excellent, thanks both! It'll be interesting to hear what the refurb entails eventually.first 5 come into service late next year. they need to be refurbished first and crew training to take place as Northern haven't operate them before.
Who is paying for the refurbishment? Porterbrook or Northern?Chime Whistle Publishing on X
Apparently the 34 Class 323s will be replaced with 37 Class 350s. Given that 350s are a bit longer and there will be a few more of them, that means a reasonable increase in capacity.
They are longer but only by 10m a unit, because 350s are 20m carriages while 323s are 22.8m. I also recall seeing that the seating capacity is not actually higher on 350/2s vs 323s. However, a refurbishment could sort this out depending on the needs of the routes they are going onto.Chime Whistle Publishing on X
Apparently the 34 Class 323s will be replaced with 37 Class 350s. Given that 350s are a bit longer and there will be a few more of them, that means a reasonable increase in capacity.
The 323s are 70.2m long, 350s are 81.36m, so nearer 11.2m longerThey are longer but only by 10m a unit, because 350s are 20m carriages while 323s are 22.8m. I also recall seeing that the seating capacity is not actually higher on 350/2s vs 323s. However, a refurbishment could sort this out depending on the needs of the routes they are going onto.
331s are equally as slow with door release- 331018 was on the Hadfield line one night this week and the journey I took lost 2 minutes across it due to the slower release cycle.Does this mean a reshuffle, with 331s being moved to routes like Hadfield and Wigan, or will some 323s be retained?
I recall someone at soho referred to the 323 fleet as one a kind and lot of the parts are obsolete for many years. So the timing to get rid of them now before they get older and more obsolete makes complete sense.The lack of 331 spare parts helps to explain why so many stoke services were operated by 331s yesterday.
Nah, just fit them to 450s insteadSo forum members dreaming of batteries and the west of England line can probably now give up?
So forum members dreaming of batteries and the west of England line can probably now give up?
It’ll be the 458’s turn nextSo forum members dreaming of batteries and the west of England line can probably now give up?
Southeastern could do with yet another microfleetIt’ll be the 458’s turn next