The GBR Southern 387 was put into GBR livery before GTR became part of DFTO.
That was only by couple of weeks though, not really the same as XC deciding to put their fleet into GBR livery with 12 months+ left to go...
The GBR Southern 387 was put into GBR livery before GTR became part of DFTO.
Oh, well yes. However, we could see something from Chiltern or GWR.That was only by couple of weeks though, not really the same as XC deciding to put their fleet into GBR livery with 12 months+ left to go...
720s are 5 coaches right? Wonder how they will deal with the asymmetricality or just “meh that’ll do”…
If so, then that will be different to the original design, which had angular-U-shaped red lines on the middle coach:Flag
Flag
Plain blue coach
Flag
Flag
I suspect we’ll see plenty of errors applying that design!
On most multiple units, no. And if it is possible to turn individual carriages within the depot, it'd presumably be simple enough to turn them twice to get the orientated correctly.Is it possible for individual carriages to be turned during routine maintenance, making a complete pig's ear of the livery?
That wouldn't make any sense. LNER promoted the 897s as 'GBR's first new trains' and by the time they're being rolled out, GBR will either be in the final stages of setup or already set up. While GBR doesn't exist yet, it will next year and it shows no signs of stopping.
I wonder if they will repaint the livery just to position the red arrow correctly when there is a coach number change on a train that is already in a GBR livery. E.g. when Southern Rail reformed their Class 171s from a 4-car unit to a 3-car unit in 2022.Is it possible for individual carriages to be turned during routine maintenance, making a complete pig's ear of the livery?
Even painting the middle car from the GBR flag to plain blue still incurs costs.Flag
Flag
Plain blue coach
Flag
Flag
I wonder if they will repaint the livery just to position the red arrow correctly when there is a coach number change on a train that is already in a GBR livery. E.g. when Southern Rail reformed their Class 171s from a 4-car unit to a 3-car unit in 2022.
If they repaint a train that is already in GBR livery, it may be a waste of money, but it would look ugly if they don't.
== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==
Even painting the middle car from the GBR flag to plain blue still incurs costs.
A one-size-fits-all policy will remove any sense of competitive spirit and employees pride in their company, bringing us back to square one where nobody will particularly care about anything anymore.
Next Monday will mark 1 year of c2c under public ownership, so I reckon 357312 will return from its 4 month absence next week.So what happened to those 720s and alleged 357?
It was controlled by the DfT before and still is now. I don't see any difference in my region.I have noticed that the rolling stock of companies recently taken back into public ownership have started to become shabby as the inevitable cost-cutting starts to take hold - another sign of a probable return to the bad old days.
The official opening ceremony of Cambridge South that the Class 720s were put into GBR livery for has been post-poned, due to the Bedford rail crash - it was deemed inappropriate (passengers injured in the crash were taken to Addenbrooke’s Hospital (which is the major trauma centre for the East of England), which Cambridge South serves, and is next to - the original proposals for the station in the 1990s called it Addenbrooke’s rail station - there was a mock-up of an Addenbrooke’s sign in Network SouthEast branding back then). So presumably we’ll see them at the official opening of Cambridge South, whenever that takes place, but there’s no date set for that yet. I believe some patients from Bedford might still be at Addenbrooke’s, and haven’t been discharged yet. So no celebration of the railways for a while.So what happened to those 720s and alleged 357?
Why hope for something we know will not happen ?I sincerely hope that this new garish GBR livery will not applied universally, with the associated costs of doing so, and will be restricted to a few examples here and there around the country to advertise the creation of the umbrella company only.
Agree. I for one am for a corporate livery, i guess though with the odd variation here and thereI can see this happening but it really should not - as I always point out the competitor is the car and air, not other rail operators. Petty spatting between rail operators helps nobody.
Is it only Lumo that realises that, or at least claims to?
Sorry but that's not happening. There's no point in designing a livery (which then has to be specialised for every type of unit) if you're going to put it on a few trains here and there. GBR isn't going to be an umbrella company - these brands (especially ones like Avanti and c2c) are going to disappear into a regional structure. And people don't just look at the colour of the train to know whether or not it's their train, or Southern and Great Northern would be having very big problems!I sincerely hope that this new garish GBR livery will not applied universally, with the associated costs of doing so, and will be restricted to a few examples here and there around the country to advertise the creation of the umbrella company only. The evolution of our railway network has created the current variations of regional liveries which are for the most part very pleasant and are important to the passengers to identify the trains they need to use. The application of a corporate identity would destroy this and therefore be a retrograde step.
I have noticed that the rolling stock of companies recently taken back into public ownership have started to become shabby as the inevitable cost-cutting starts to take hold - another sign of a probable return to the bad old days.
A one-size-fits-all policy will remove any sense of competitive spirit and employees pride in their company, bringing us back to square one where nobody will particularly care about anything anymore.
Thanks for the info! That's quite sensible of them.The official opening ceremony of Cambridge South that the Class 720s were put into GBR livery for has been post-poned, due to the Bedford rail crash - it was deemed inappropriate (passengers injured in the crash were taken to Addenbrooke’s Hospital (which is the major trauma centre for the East of England), which Cambridge South serves, and is next to - the original proposals for the station in the 1990s called it Addenbrooke’s rail station - there was a mock-up of an Addenbrooke’s sign in Network SouthEast branding back then). So presumably we’ll see them at the official opening of Cambridge South, whenever that takes place, but there’s no date set for that yet. I believe some patients from Bedford might still be at Addenbrooke’s, and haven’t been discharged yet. So no celebration of the railways for a while.
If you mean the LED displays on the doors of the Pendolinos and by the doors of the Voyagers, it hasn't gone out of fashion. In fact, pretty much all modern trains have it, though for commuter trains sometimes not by the doors.Why has the Virgin introduced "destination / service / next stop" sign by each door gone out of fashion? Are on-platform displays and station wayfinding clear enough?
Do they? I'm not taking about the repeater screens stuck in random windows showing the same destination as the front of the train, but ones next to the places that people are actually looking at (the doors) with useful information that answers "does this train stop at x?" and "is this actually the 1207 departure?" I'll give you the 80x's, even though it's not really near the doors, but not present on the vast majority of other new stock.If you mean the LED displays on the doors of the Pendolinos and by the doors of the Voyagers, it hasn't gone out of fashion. In fact, pretty much all modern trains have it, though for commuter trains sometimes not by the doors.
I think the GBR livery looks smart and I’m looking forward to seeing it roll out wider.
I agree that costs need to be considered as it’s not a good look to spend thousands on rebranding but the railway needs to build a brand image that represents the brand like TFL or Scotrail.
I will miss the c2c brand but welcome a change that will hopefully be for the better.
And the c2c trains seem better than ever externally with an exterior refresh. Likewise GA trains all look in good nick to my eyes.
Maybe one day we will love the GBR livery and lament when it gets replaced. Maybe not. However today I am positive and want it to succeed.
Hope to see 357 312 in its GBR glory soon.
And the shabbiest I use is Cross Country, which won’t be publicly owned until the end of the process so can’t blame DfT for scuffing their paintwork and threadbare carpets. Or, maybe you can and actually they’ve been in control for longer than anybody realised and just had their pet projects to keep trains around London looking smartIt was controlled by the DfT before and still is now. I don't see any difference in my region.
Youd think that most units with long paint warranties will get some kind of GBR branding applied and removal of current TOC names as a cost saver.I know it's not BR but back then, trains were re-varnished/re-liveried as they fell due for overhaul. However, the application of, and even then liveries/identities now are not as simple as slapping on all over green or blue - or even blue & grey - plus the fact locos and carriages built within the past few years will have paint warranties, so there will be no rush for a national push towards putting trains into GBR livery. I would prefer reliable and resilient services rather than a rush for trains being taken out of service for draping in the union jack colours