eleganturtle
Member
Hi all, I am hoping for some advice regarding a letter I received from South Western Railway's Revenue Protection team approximately two weeks ago, which I only became aware of today.
On 29 December 2025 I was stopped at London Waterloo by a Revenue Protection officer. I presented a ticket from Clapham Junction to London Waterloo. I was asked where I had actually travelled from and admitted it was Esher. I was issued a Report for Prosecution on the day.
I subsequently received a letter from SWR stating they have investigated my online account and identified what they describe as inconsistencies in my ticket purchase history going back to 10 July 2024. They note that ticket scan data shows tickets were only scanned at one end of journeys. They have also noted tickets between London Waterloo, Vauxhall and Clapham Junction that were not scanned in or out. They are asking me to explain my journeys and whether I also travelled from Esher on those occasions.
On most journeys I purchased two tickets — a short ticket at the origin station and a short ticket at the destination, with the middle section of the journey not covered. The journeys were primarily between the Kingston upon Thames (KNG)/Surbiton (SUR) area and London Waterloo (WAT). The tickets held were typically:
I hold a valid 16-25 railcard. I am currently 21. All tickets were purchased using this railcard via Trainline prior to journeys commencing.
I have sent an acknowledgement email to SWR stating I am seeking legal advice before responding fully and have provided my contact details as requested. I am currently in the process of consulting a solicitor and I am wondering whether the cost of the solicitor is worth the amount of risk of me handling this myself.
I would like to resolve this as a civil out of court settlement, paying any outstanding fares owed, and avoid criminal prosecution.
I am unsure how to respond to SWR's request for journey explanations, how the charges would be calculated and whether a solicitor is necessary given the relatively small number of journeys involved. Any advice would be greatly appreciated.
On 29 December 2025 I was stopped at London Waterloo by a Revenue Protection officer. I presented a ticket from Clapham Junction to London Waterloo. I was asked where I had actually travelled from and admitted it was Esher. I was issued a Report for Prosecution on the day.
I subsequently received a letter from SWR stating they have investigated my online account and identified what they describe as inconsistencies in my ticket purchase history going back to 10 July 2024. They note that ticket scan data shows tickets were only scanned at one end of journeys. They have also noted tickets between London Waterloo, Vauxhall and Clapham Junction that were not scanned in or out. They are asking me to explain my journeys and whether I also travelled from Esher on those occasions.
On most journeys I purchased two tickets — a short ticket at the origin station and a short ticket at the destination, with the middle section of the journey not covered. The journeys were primarily between the Kingston upon Thames (KNG)/Surbiton (SUR) area and London Waterloo (WAT). The tickets held were typically:
- Origin: Kingston upon Thames to Norbiton or Surbiton to Berrylands
- Destination: Vauxhall to London Waterloo or Clapham Junction to London Waterloo
I hold a valid 16-25 railcard. I am currently 21. All tickets were purchased using this railcard via Trainline prior to journeys commencing.
I have sent an acknowledgement email to SWR stating I am seeking legal advice before responding fully and have provided my contact details as requested. I am currently in the process of consulting a solicitor and I am wondering whether the cost of the solicitor is worth the amount of risk of me handling this myself.
I would like to resolve this as a civil out of court settlement, paying any outstanding fares owed, and avoid criminal prosecution.
I am unsure how to respond to SWR's request for journey explanations, how the charges would be calculated and whether a solicitor is necessary given the relatively small number of journeys involved. Any advice would be greatly appreciated.