Y Ddraig Coch
Established Member
Nor me, but she gave unions a run for their money, rightly or wrongly.I’m not so sure about that one.
== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==
No wonder they are clambering to join us![]()
Nor me, but she gave unions a run for their money, rightly or wrongly.I’m not so sure about that one.
== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==
No wonder they are clambering to join us![]()
I don't understand the problem. Just because staff might be recruited to work Sundays does not men they could not also be required to initially work on some weekdays to shadow existing staffQuestion is who will train those "flexible staff".
Staff are trained on basics by a trainer (0900-1700 Mon-Fri) at HQ of the TOC, but shadow an actual conductor to learn the role every other day of week including antisocial times . The trainer ALWAYS says "I'll teach you the role but you'll learn the actual job when you shadow an experienced member of staff". There is no work around this.
This is the reason why there were numerous safety incidents during the 2 year strike as office based staff were forced (due to their contracts) to work as contingency conductors but have never shadowed a real conductor. Not to say that experienced conductors don't make mistakes, but there's a much longer period between the time being out and safety incidents compared to the contingency staff. No coincidence.
If the DfT make an exceptional offer, Sunday service will improve and so will revenue.
Not necessarily. They could be Sunday/bank holiday only contracts. They are not zero hours.That would be tantamount to zero hours contracts and the railway proper does not entertain such working practices.
.
They would be zero hours contracts as the existing staff would have to be offered all the turns first possibly leaving no jobs to cover. It would be totally against all existing agreements and the reason why it’s never happened before.I don't understand the problem. Just because staff might be recruited to work Sundays does not men they could not also be required to initially work on some weekdays to shadow existing staff
== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==
Not necessarily. They could be Sunday/bank holiday only contracts. They are not zero hours.
No doubt. However those with long memories will remember the wrangles around single-manning of freight trains, DOO in all its forms and standard 8-hour days giving way to flexible rostering all of which necessitated a bit of industrial turmoil, higher wage bill for drivers and in each case eventually the result which management had tabled. It also required strong managers with what has occasionally been described as "intestinal fortitude" and had worked their way up from the ranks, thus knowing which were genuine "shop floor" concerns and which were traditional historical "bs".It would be totally against all existing agreements and the reason why it’s never happened before.
There are other options, such as annualised hours contracts, where there is the ability to accrue the contracted number of working hours over the course of a year.They would be zero hours contracts as the existing staff would have to be offered all the turns first possibly leaving no jobs to cover. It would be totally against all existing agreements and the reason why it’s never happened before.
How on earth would that work then? how many people would be wanting to be recruited to a rather highly skilled job of driving a train only to be told you may or may not be working this weekend?There are other options, such as annualised hours contracts, where there is the ability to accrue the contracted number of working hours over the course of a year.
It wouldn’t and that’s why it’s not done. We go round & round in circles with this every six months or so.How on earth would that work then? how many people would be wanting to be recruited to a rather highly skilled job of driving a train only to be told you may or may not be working this weekend?
Thats when skill fade happens and people then make mistakes and accident shappen.
It wouldn’t and that’s why it’s not done. We go round & round in circles with this every six months or so.
No idea but if it does you can bet there were years & years of negotiations.London Underground has dedicated drivers for the weekend Night Tube does it not?
They did when Night Tube was introduced but that ceased around five years ago, with all drivers now working Night Tube services a few times a year.London Underground has dedicated drivers for the weekend Night Tube does it not?
Drivers on the west side have booked Sundays paid as overtime. If a driver wants a Sunday off they have to find someone to cover their boooked shift. The problems aren't caused by drivers. Guards however, their Sundays are entirely voluntary paid at a slightly higher rate than a normal day.How on earth would that work then? how many people would be wanting to be recruited to a rather highly skilled job of driving a train only to be told you may or may not be working this weekend?
Thats when skill fade happens and people then make mistakes and accident shappen.
It's how freight driving for the smaller operators works, so it's absolutely possible. Just that the weak management at Northern and the DfT (lack of "intestinal fortitude" as @GordonT says) means that no-one is willing to tackle the issue head-on.How on earth would that work then? how many people would be wanting to be recruited to a rather highly skilled job of driving a train only to be told you may or may not be working this weekend?
Thats when skill fade happens and people then make mistakes and accident shappen.
Ahh okDrivers on the west side have booked Sundays paid as overtime. If a driver wants a Sunday off they have to find someone to cover their boooked shift. The problems aren't caused by drivers. Guards however, their Sundays are entirely voluntary paid at a slightly higher rate than a normal day.
Well it seems the only answer is to chuck money at it - and it seems no one has had the appetite to do that for 20 yearsThose who are saying 'can't be done' to all the suggestions are still left with the question of how to answer the public when they say 'we're the customers. We're the ones who the rail industry exists for. Get it sorted'?
Is it ? Ive no idea how freight on the railway works to be fair i just see them pull into the sidings and run around and go back out again at DarloIt's how freight driving for the smaller operators works, so it's absolutely possible. Just that the weak management at Northern and the DfT (lack of "intestinal fortitude" as @GordonT says) means that no-one is willing to tackle the issue head-on.

It varies depending on the FOC but certainly many operate on the concept of annualised hours to even out the busy and quiet periods (e.g. Railhead Treatment Train in the autumn and Christmas shopping containers, with spring and summer which tend to be a bit quieter). And a small number operate on a "zero hours" contract basis.Is it ? Ive no idea how freight on the railway works to be fair i just see them pull into the sidings and run around and go back out again at Darlo![]()
Given this service, and others affected by Sunday arrangements, have long been part of Northern's franchise commitments (and the current day equivalent of that) it is reasonable to regard delivery of them as part of their existing funding envelope.Ahh ok
Well it seems the only answer is to chuck money at it - and it seems no one has had the appetite to do that for 20 years
as a frequent user of the £12 northern newspaper rover, no, also TPE are more expensiveJust give sundays to TPE and problem may be solved
No idea where they would go to/from like but hey its a start