• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Brighton Mainline 4G/5G upgrades

MrJeeves

Established Member
Associate Staff
Senior Fares Advisor
Joined
28 Aug 2015
Messages
4,630
Location
Burgess Hill
Cellnex put in an application for a large phone mast near Wivelsfield station (DM/25/0589) in March this year and another for near Hassocks (DM/24/2531) in late October 2024, later amended in March 2025 too.

The Hassocks site would be south of the station within the land of the old Goods Yard. It looks like the amended plans show a reduction in the site's footprint from 3 antennas per sector down to only two.

1745782707490.png

The Wivelsfield site is to the north of the station, west of the line, next to the previously-prone-to-failure embankment within a small nature reserve area with footpaths leading along the railway line.

1745783085962.png

I'm sure we can all imagine what the public consultation comments are for these two planning applications... Some people are beyond words.
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

infobleep

On Moderation
Joined
27 Feb 2011
Messages
13,451
Cellnex put in an application for a large phone mast near Wivelsfield station (DM/25/0589) in March this year and another for near Hassocks (DM/24/2531) in late October 2024, later amended in March 2025 too.

The Hassocks site would be south of the station within the land of the old Goods Yard. It looks like the amended plans show a reduction in the site's footprint from 3 antennas per sector down to only two.

View attachment 179056

The Wivelsfield site is to the north of the station, west of the line, next to the previously-prone-to-failure embankment within a small nature reserve area with footpaths leading along the railway line.

View attachment 179057

I'm sure we can all imagine what the public consultation comments are for these two planning applications... Some people are beyond words.
I wonder how many of them want decent mobile phone reception?
 

jon0844

Veteran Member
Joined
1 Feb 2009
Messages
30,861
Location
UK
I wonder how many of them want decent mobile phone reception?

All of them, but they likely expect the sites to be hidden.

An application a couple of years ago in Welwyn Garden City, in what I believe is part of the conservation area, had objectors saying they should put the site within the trees of the nearby woods so it wouldn't be an eyesore...

...or actually give anywhere near a good, reliable, service.
 

MrJeeves

Established Member
Associate Staff
Senior Fares Advisor
Joined
28 Aug 2015
Messages
4,630
Location
Burgess Hill
It's the same people who visit foreign countries and make remarks about "wow the data is so much better here!" without seemingly putting two and two together and noticing coverage sites on every other rooftop...!
 

jon0844

Veteran Member
Joined
1 Feb 2009
Messages
30,861
Location
UK
It's the same people who visit foreign countries and make remarks about "wow the data is so much better here!" without seemingly putting two and two together and noticing coverage sites on every other rooftop...!

I know. Ironically, we probably look out for the infrastructure but if you aren't into this sort of thing then I bet 99% of people don't see all the cell towers and panels mounted anywhere and everywhere - they just notice they're getting amazing service everywhere they go, indoors and out, above ground and below.

And as I've said before, people are more likely to buy a house if it has good connectivity - not the other way round. So if you've argued against a cell tower for house prices (most do) then it seems self-defeating.
 

mrmartin

Established Member
Joined
17 Dec 2012
Messages
1,281
I know. Ironically, we probably look out for the infrastructure but if you aren't into this sort of thing then I bet 99% of people don't see all the cell towers and panels mounted anywhere and everywhere - they just notice they're getting amazing service everywhere they go, indoors and out, above ground and below.

And as I've said before, people are more likely to buy a house if it has good connectivity - not the other way round. So if you've argued against a cell tower for house prices (most do) then it seems self-defeating.
Yeah I was in Greece recently and the cell service was incredible. Rare to not have NR3500 despite being in the middle of nowhere. Then you look round and there is a mast on the top of a lot of the mountains which explains it!
 
Last edited:

MrJeeves

Established Member
Associate Staff
Senior Fares Advisor
Joined
28 Aug 2015
Messages
4,630
Location
Burgess Hill
I've been reliably informed that the first phase of this programme is expected to go live next year.

The overall enhancements have been clarified to me as "three major stations, key tunnels and selected macros sites along the route [from London to Brighton]". Which three? Who knows.

Maybe some improvement works at Victoria and Brighton, and another enroute? Gatwick has antennas at platform-level which were installed alongside the other concourse works which already have O2 on, so I'd imagine another station alongside the termini. London Bridge has some antennas at platform-level which aren't used yet as far as I know.

There are also some other projects ongoing to improve coverage on additional mainlines.
 

AFJF

New Member
Joined
18 May 2017
Messages
3
Location
West Sussex
Cellnex are currently running a consultation on a new mast just off of Rocky Lane in Haywards Heath. Mid Sussex application DM/25/1495 -

The installation of a 22.5 metre lattice mast, mounted with 9No. antennas, 12No. cabinets, 1No. Electrical meter cabinet located within a compound comprised of 2.4 metre high chain-link fence topped with 3 strands of barbed wire and the creation of a new access from Rocky Lane and ancillary development thereto.
 

MrJeeves

Established Member
Associate Staff
Senior Fares Advisor
Joined
28 Aug 2015
Messages
4,630
Location
Burgess Hill
Cellnex put in an application for a large phone mast near Wivelsfield station (DM/25/0589) in March this year
This got approved a while back, and streetworks applications have been submitted to build it between June and September this year.
Cellnex works
07 Jun '26 23:00 to 04 Sep '26 22:59

Work description
Build new telecoms site. Traffic management required for access/egress into the grassland for deliveries & site access. 2 weeks prep works to create site compound, lay trackway etc. 8 weeks to build the tower and 2 weeks de-mob works.

As Cellnex is a private infrastructure company, after this they also need to convince operators to join it, and then they have to set up their equipment on the site. No guarantee any of that will happen soon.

== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==

The overall enhancements have been clarified to me as "three major stations, key tunnels and selected macros sites along the route [from London to Brighton]". Which three? Who knows.
To add some context to this, users of the BML may have noticed a lot of new infra at Clapham Junction, which I suspect is one of those three major stations.

PXL_20250708_175512260.jpgPXL_20251031_231023051.NIGHT(1).jpg

I mentioned this in the thread below, but didn't think to post them here!


== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==

As my final update of the morning, Cellnex have now also submitted a planning application (DM/26/0526) to build a new access road to an existing site along the railway between Balcombe and Haywards Heath, currently maintained by O2 (despite the application saying Vodafone).

This appears to be linked to application DM/23/0986 from 2023 for a new site at the location too, so indicates some progress may be made there soon.

 
Last edited:

MrJeeves

Established Member
Associate Staff
Senior Fares Advisor
Joined
28 Aug 2015
Messages
4,630
Location
Burgess Hill
I have created a Google My Map of all the infrastructure being built as part of these works.

My understanding is that some of these elements are already ready for mobile operators to begin their own integration works, and all should be ready for that by the end of the year. No idea how long the networks will take to do their part, though!


There's quite a significant amount of new sites being installed, alongside in-tunnel solutions for Balcombe, Patcham, Clayton and Merstham tunnels, along with new macro sites on rail and non-rail land, not to mention trackside "pole" solutions and directional tunnel portal antennas.

I'm happily surprised!
 

mr_jrt

Established Member
Joined
30 May 2011
Messages
1,574
Location
Brighton
Oh, thank jeebus, at last, some movement. The reception along there is shockingly bad, made all the worse by, at most, only half the Thameslink trains actually having their wifi installed.
 

MrJeeves

Established Member
Associate Staff
Senior Fares Advisor
Joined
28 Aug 2015
Messages
4,630
Location
Burgess Hill
My understanding is that some of these elements are already ready for mobile operators to begin their own integration works, and all should be ready for that by the end of the year. No idea how long the networks will take to do their part, though!
I am aware of at least one mobile network whose plans are to go live on at least some of the infrastructure (including the station DAS systems) by the end of the year.
 

AFJF

New Member
Joined
18 May 2017
Messages
3
Location
West Sussex
The new mast at Haywards Heath Ashenground bridge is progressing well.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_1944.jpeg
    IMG_1944.jpeg
    5.3 MB · Views: 73

MrJeeves

Established Member
Associate Staff
Senior Fares Advisor
Joined
28 Aug 2015
Messages
4,630
Location
Burgess Hill

Top