• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Bond Street barriers were overcharging. TfL after MP intervention has refunded the constituent

bakerstreet

Member
Joined
29 Nov 2009
Messages
1,160
Location
-
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

Mcr Warrior

Veteran Member
Joined
8 Jan 2009
Messages
17,154
Person(s) charged at the £10.40 daily cap rate due to "incomplete journeys" ostensibly being recorded (this due to the faulty gates)?
 

Starmill

Veteran Member
Joined
18 May 2012
Messages
27,143
Location
Bolton
Person(s) charged at the £10.40 daily cap rate due to "incomplete journeys" ostensibly being recorded (this due to the faulty gates)?
It reads like the taps from this particular gate array were regularly going missing, which, unfortunately, does happen from time to time. Unless I'm reading it wrong...
 

Adam Williams

Established Member
Joined
2 Jan 2018
Messages
3,498
Location
Warks
Why did it take a constituent complaining to their MP for this to be identified and rectified?

Is there really no proactive monitoring in terms of comms heartbeats or at the very least, some sort of alerting if the number of taps received is lower than it "should" be?
 

81A

Member
Joined
22 May 2026
Messages
259
Location
UK
Why did it take a constituent complaining to their MP for this to be identified and rectified?

Is there really no proactive monitoring in terms of comms heartbeats or at the very least, some sort of alerting if the number of taps received is lower than it "should" be?
Indeed, if it takes an MPs intervention to get every fares issue fixed every station needs to be made into a constituency with its own MP :lol:
 

Starmill

Veteran Member
Joined
18 May 2012
Messages
27,143
Location
Bolton
Why did it take a constituent complaining to their MP for this to be identified and rectified?

Is there really no proactive monitoring in terms of comms heartbeats or at the very least, some sort of alerting if the number of taps received is lower than it "should" be?
It could be that the taps themselves were fine but they just weren't making it to where they needed to be in good time. I have seen myself how taps can suddenly appear as late as a couple of weeks after the tap. Maybe in this case the customer raised a complaint as soon as the debit cleared their account, as is their right to do, and eventually escalated it to their representative, but the taps would have come through. That's still very, very sub-par, of course.
 

AlterEgo

Verified Rep - Wingin' It! Paul Lucas
Joined
30 Dec 2008
Messages
29,181
Location
LBK
Absurd situation all round, not least the continued propensity for Members of Parliament to be treated as a supreme customer service ombudsman rather than lawmakers and parliamentarians. That speaks of such a failing in our corporate culture that it should ever be necessary.
 

talldave

Established Member
Joined
24 Jan 2013
Messages
2,676
Absurd situation all round, not least the continued propensity for Members of Parliament to be treated as a supreme customer service ombudsman rather than lawmakers and parliamentarians. That speaks of such a failing in our corporate culture that it should ever be necessary.
Indeed. Perhaps passengers should just start their communication with "As the MP for Lower Bond Street, ..." as I doubt anyone in TfL knows anything about MPs!
 

Deerfold

Veteran Member
Joined
26 Nov 2009
Messages
13,678
Location
Yorkshire
Indeed. Perhaps passengers should just start their communication with "As the MP for Lower Bond Street, ..." as I doubt anyone in TfL knows anything about MPs!
Oh, they do.

When I worked for TfL, queries certified as coming from MPs got top priority.
 

The exile

Established Member
Joined
31 Mar 2010
Messages
9,307
Location
Somerset
Absurd situation all round, not least the continued propensity for Members of Parliament to be treated as a supreme customer service ombudsman rather than lawmakers and parliamentarians. That speaks of such a failing in our corporate culture that it should ever be necessary.
Their role as their constituents’ voice in the corridors of power is, tbh, one of their most important - and it’s also how they can keep a finger on the pulse of society.
 

Haywain

Veteran Member
Joined
3 Feb 2013
Messages
24,480
Their role as their constituents’ voice in the corridors of power is, tbh, one of their most important - and it’s also how they can keep a finger on the pulse of society.
Absolutely. And the things that make most businesses and organisations sit up and take notice are attention from MPs or from the media.
 

AlterEgo

Verified Rep - Wingin' It! Paul Lucas
Joined
30 Dec 2008
Messages
29,181
Location
LBK
Oh, they do.

When I worked for TfL, queries certified as coming from MPs got top priority.
Yes, (pseudo) public sector bodies and TOCs do pay attention and the letters we got at XC and Virgin got handled separately to other correspondence.

Their role as their constituents’ voice in the corridors of power is, tbh, one of their most important - and it’s also how they can keep a finger on the pulse of society.
That's as may be, but it is not a good place for our culture to be in - that overcharging only gets resolved when someone who might raise it in the House of Commons writes a letter (or their caseworker does).
 

Top