• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Why Sanderstead? (3 questions in 1!)

frankmoh

On Moderation
Joined
7 May 2025
Messages
817
Location
London
Mark 3 derived EMUs aren't cleared beyond Sanderstead.
Inspired by this message from @JonathanH

When the Woodside and South Croydon line was electrified, it was decided to put third rail all the way to Sanderstead.

Three questions:
  • Why did they only go to Sanderstead and also not electrify the short line to South Croydon?
  • Why are Mk3 EMUs not allowed past the station?
  • Why did SR/BR terminate services there and not do something like a diesel/DEMU East Grinstead to London via Elmers End service?
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

Surreytraveller

On Moderation
Joined
21 Oct 2009
Messages
3,905
Mk 3s wouldn't fit through Oxted Tunnel, as it's a bit tight. That's why only slam door trains with window bars fitted could run down there.
The Sectional Appendix also stated (it may well still do) that vestibule doors leading to other units had to be locked to prevent people sticking their heads out the drop-down windows behind intermediate driving cabs.
 

30907

Veteran Member
Joined
30 Sep 2012
Messages
21,922
Location
Airedale
1. There was no point electrifying Selsdon-S Croydon as there was no obvious service to use it. The Brighton had Coulsdon N as a convenient Local Line terminus - Sanderstead was accessed off the Main Lines; it was also an awkward place for terminating trains as it involved a down to up shunt beyond the station, which is why evening peak trains mostly terminated at Selsdon.
3. The residents of East Grinstead etc wanted London and running via the Mid Kent would have added a good 15min to their journey.
 

nw1

Established Member
Joined
9 Aug 2013
Messages
9,414
There was a phase when they did electrify South Croydon to Sanderstead, but no further.

Certainly by May 1986. I recall a half-hourly Holborn Viaduct-Sanderstead service that year, via East Croydon (not sure what route it took to get there, though).

I'm guessing East Grinstead electrification was already on the cards by then, and starting the project early with the extension to Sanderstead permitted trains to reverse there, rather than trying to do so at East Croydon which by that stage seemed to be rigorously avoided (in contrast to the pre-GatEx timetable which had one terminator every half hour).
 

30907

Veteran Member
Joined
30 Sep 2012
Messages
21,922
Location
Airedale
There was a phase when they did electrify South Croydon to Sanderstead, but no further.

Certainly by May 1986. I recall a half-hourly Holborn Viaduct-Sanderstead service that year, via East Croydon (not sure what route it took to get there, though).
It didn't exist in 1982 ( can't quickly check later).
I'm guessing East Grinstead electrification was already on the cards by then,
It was certainly complete by October 1987 - I have vivid memories of EMUs NOT reaching East G in the aftermath of the non-hurricane :)
 

nw1

Established Member
Joined
9 Aug 2013
Messages
9,414
It didn't exist in 1982 ( can't quickly check later).
No, definitely not in 1982 and not in 1985 either, I don't think.
It was certainly complete by October 1987 - I have vivid memories of EMUs NOT reaching East G in the aftermath of the non-hurricane :)

Though they definitely did by Tues 27 Oct. That day I spent at East Croydon and observed the workings of the newly-electrified East Grinstead line.
 

Sir Felix Pole

Established Member
Joined
21 Oct 2012
Messages
2,157
Location
Wilmslow
Woodside to Sanderstead was electrified in 1935 in anticipation of the Southern Heights Rly., from Sanderstead to Orpington, which never materialised. It then became something of an embarrassment, but staggered on until 1983. There was also little point in electrifying South Croydon to Selsdon either, until East Grinstead came on stream.
 

izvor

Member
Joined
11 Jun 2014
Messages
570
Location
on the SER
There was a phase when they did electrify South Croydon to Sanderstead, but no further.
Certainly by May 1986. I recall a half-hourly Holborn Viaduct-Sanderstead service that year, via East Croydon (not sure what route it took to get there, though).
Indeed, it started in May 1986 and ran via Tulse Hill. I had forgotten about this one.

Woodside to Sanderstead was electrified in 1935 in anticipation of the Southern Heights Rly., from Sanderstead to Orpington, which never materialised.
The Southern Heights plan was virtually moribund by 1931 when Col. Stephens died, so it is unlikely there was any connection.
 

Taunton

Veteran Member
Joined
1 Aug 2013
Messages
12,224
Woodside to Sanderstead was electrified in 1935 in anticipation of the Southern Heights Rly., from Sanderstead to Orpington, which never materialised. It then became something of an embarrassment, but staggered on until 1983.
The Southern had a few of these, third rail electrification being pretty cheap, especially if you could avoid a substation, but the stations were a bit of a cost. The unelectrified South Croydon to Selsdon link was little more than a couple of train lengths, and I did once idly wonder if there was a lineside power feeder there supplying the Sanderstead conductor rails from the Brighton Line.

Comparable was electrification to Horsted Keynes, which must have carried even less passengers. Or the Addiscombe twig, compatriot of the Sanderstead electrics. Coulsdon North's value, or not, was discussed here a while ago.
 

Rescars

Established Member
Joined
25 May 2021
Messages
2,517
Location
Surrey
The Southern had a few of these, third rail electrification being pretty cheap, especially if you could avoid a substation, but the stations were a bit of a cost. The unelectrified South Croydon to Selsdon link was little more than a couple of train lengths, and I did once idly wonder if there was a lineside power feeder there supplying the Sanderstead conductor rails from the Brighton Line.

Comparable was electrification to Horsted Keynes, which must have carried even less passengers. Or the Addiscombe twig, compatriot of the Sanderstead electrics. Coulsdon North's value, or not, was discussed here a while ago.
Unlike the others, Coulsdon North was a conversion from the LBSC overhead system.
 

35B

Established Member
Joined
19 Dec 2011
Messages
5,364
The Southern had a few of these, third rail electrification being pretty cheap, especially if you could avoid a substation, but the stations were a bit of a cost. The unelectrified South Croydon to Selsdon link was little more than a couple of train lengths, and I did once idly wonder if there was a lineside power feeder there supplying the Sanderstead conductor rails from the Brighton Line.

Comparable was electrification to Horsted Keynes, which must have carried even less passengers. Or the Addiscombe twig, compatriot of the Sanderstead electrics. Coulsdon North's value, or not, was discussed here a while ago.
Addiscombe at least provided carriage stabling
 

Nicholas Lewis

Established Member
Joined
9 Aug 2019
Messages
7,987
Location
Surrey
The Southern had a few of these, third rail electrification being pretty cheap, especially if you could avoid a substation, but the stations were a bit of a cost. The unelectrified South Croydon to Selsdon link was little more than a couple of train lengths, and I did once idly wonder if there was a lineside power feeder there supplying the Sanderstead conductor rails from the Brighton Line.
There was a substation installed under the 1933 Brighton electrification scheme at Sth Croydon Jcn but i don't recollect it having circuit breakers for Sanderstead but given Selsdon Jcn was so close and the Addiscombe to Sanderstead section wasnt electrified till 1935 its possible it did. Also it was nearly four miles to Elmers End whivh was next nearest substation so would have been a stretch.
 

westcoaster

Established Member
Joined
4 Dec 2006
Messages
4,490
Location
DTOS A or B
Mk 3s wouldn't fit through Oxted Tunnel, as it's a bit tight. That's why only slam door trains with window bars fitted could run down there.
Having been driving the route for a while now, Oxted tunnel walls are not a smooth curve. They are about 100m straight then an angle then 100m most of the way through. The tunnel is pretty much a left hand turn the whole way through.
 

izvor

Member
Joined
11 Jun 2014
Messages
570
Location
on the SER
Having been driving the route for a while now, Oxted tunnel walls are not a smooth curve. They are about 100m straight then an angle then 100m most of the way through. The tunnel is pretty much a left hand turn the whole way through.
Or right hand going the other way...? :)

Joking aside though, that's interesting. Oxted tunnel suffered a major collapse in 1919, and I believe the line was slewed as a result; there is apparently a cavern within the tunnel due to this, called Rose Cottage by PW men.

Window bars: I remember these on some units (4-VEPs?) but I don't think on the DEMUs, and certainly not on the Mk.1 stock that was used on loco-hauled trains.
 

Surreytraveller

On Moderation
Joined
21 Oct 2009
Messages
3,905
Or right hand going the other way...? :)

Joking aside though, that's interesting. Oxted tunnel suffered a major collapse in 1919, and I believe the line was slewed as a result; there is apparently a cavern within the tunnel due to this, called Rose Cottage by PW men.

Window bars: I remember these on some units (4-VEPs?) but I don't think on the DEMUs, and certainly not on the Mk.1 stock that was used on loco-hauled trains.
Don't think the requirement for window bars came in until after electrification, so loco hauled stock would never have required it. Originally, CIGs were allowed down there, but they were banned when the requirement for window bars came in and only VEPs and EPBs were fitted.
DEMUs had window bars fitted after the requirement came in
 

izvor

Member
Joined
11 Jun 2014
Messages
570
Location
on the SER
Don't think the requirement for window bars came in until after electrification, so loco hauled stock would never have required it. Originally, CIGs were allowed down there, but they were banned when the requirement for window bars came in and only VEPs and EPBs were fitted.
DEMUs had window bars fitted after the requirement came in
Thanks, yes that ties in with my recollections.
 

norbitonflyer

Established Member
Joined
24 Mar 2020
Messages
5,660
Location
SW London
Don't think the requirement for window bars came in until after electrification, so loco hauled stock would never have required it. Originally, CIGs were allowed down there, but they were banned when the requirement for window bars came in and only VEPs and EPBs were fitted.
DEMUs had window bars fitted after the requirement came in
207s were of narrower profile than the standard mark 1 profile, although of course 205s also worked the line.
 

Taunton

Veteran Member
Joined
1 Aug 2013
Messages
12,224
207s were of narrower profile than the standard mark 1 profile, although of course 205s also worked the line.
I think the restriction for the narrower 207s applied to the section between Tonbridge and Tunbridge Wells West, where a couple of the units long operated an hourly shuttle service, rather than the main diesel services from London, and the 205s which were progressively moved over to the line, many of which stabled overnight at Tunbridge Wells West depot, just could not work any further. Eventually this section from Eridge was closed.
 

norbitonflyer

Established Member
Joined
24 Mar 2020
Messages
5,660
Location
SW London
I think the restriction for the narrower 207s applied to the section between Tonbridge and Tunbridge Wells West, where a couple of the units long operated an hourly shuttle service, rather than the main diesel services from London,Eventually this section from Eridge was closed.
The narrower profile (but not as narrow as the Hastings gauge) was indeed for the tunnel at Tunbridge Wells, but it did also result in a slightly better clearance in the Oxted tunnel than the 205s had. With hindsight, I wonder why a couple of units were not built to Hasting gauge (even perhaps re-using some of the redundant cars that also provided the "Tadpole" units) so that the East Sussex line units could be built on the same jigs as the Hampshire units
 

zwk500

Veteran Member
Joined
20 Jan 2020
Messages
18,403
Location
Northampton
Comparable was electrification to Horsted Keynes, which must have carried even less passengers.
The explanation I have normally heard given for Horsted Keynes was for operational reasons, to avoid Seaford - Haywards Heath trains occupying platforms for too long at the latter. Once you've gone as far as Ardingly, it presumably was better to extend to Horsted Keynes for the onward journey opportunities. Especially given Ardingly's remoteness from potential passenger traffic.
 

35B

Established Member
Joined
19 Dec 2011
Messages
5,364
Or the Addiscombe twig, compatriot of the Sanderstead electrics.
Which provided carriage stabling - and the branch was I think rather more important earlier on than the Sanderstead connection
 

frodshamfella

Established Member
Joined
25 Sep 2010
Messages
2,029
Location
Frodsham
I went to Addiscombe once and used Woodside a few times. I also went from Elmers End to Sanderstead not long before the route closed. Neither of these branch lines were busy when I went on them, but I presume the Addiscombe branch was the busier of the two ?
 

30907

Veteran Member
Joined
30 Sep 2012
Messages
21,922
Location
Airedale
With hindsight, I wonder why a couple of units were not built to Hasting gauge (even perhaps re-using some of the redundant cars that also provided the "Tadpole" units) so that the East Sussex line units could be built on the same jigs as the Hampshire units
The complex E Sussex network would have been rather less efficient if TWW to Tonbridge had been operated separately - though TBF diagramming the mix of Mk1 hauled and 3-Ds must have been "interesting."
On reflection though the SE could have spared a couple of 6S units by 1963....
Which provided carriage stabling - and the branch was I think rather more important earlier on than the Sanderstead connection
Indeed - Addiscombe was the SER's Croydon station!
 

Rescars

Established Member
Joined
25 May 2021
Messages
2,517
Location
Surrey
Indeed - Addiscombe was the SER's Croydon station!
.....though the SER and LBSC did operate East Croydon as a joint enterprise (which is why the LBSC opened what are now platforms 1 and 2 and called them New Croydon so they could undercut the agreed fares from East Croydon!)
 

Top