• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Hitachi Factory - First Group order 14 new trains with options for 13 more

Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

lrbvoyager

Member
Joined
2 Jan 2025
Messages
372
There is no new trains ordered for the Stirling route.

The trains ordered are for East Coast Lumo and for Hull Trains.
When I watched one of the interviews about the upcoming services one of the reps said that the new trains ordered were for the Stirling route aswell.
 

cj_1985

Member
Joined
6 Mar 2010
Messages
845
Location
Lanarkshire
When I watched one of the interviews about the upcoming services one of the reps said that the new trains ordered were for the Stirling route aswell.
They won't order for the Stirling service unless their access agreement is extended beyond 2030
 

222001

Member
Joined
1 Sep 2006
Messages
837
Location
Chesterfield
They won't order for the Stirling service unless their access agreement is extended beyond 2030
I suppose it is possible that they could take from the order already made. 14 trains is a lot, and it's always puzzled me how they'd be allocated out, as I believe the Carmarthen service will only need around 5 sets. That leaves 9 for 'extra capacity'. Unless they start doubling up a lot of other services, or off lease some of their current trains on the ECML route, that's a lot remaining.
 

800001

Established Member
Joined
24 Oct 2015
Messages
7,308
I suppose it is possible that they could take from the order already made. 14 trains is a lot, and it's always puzzled me how they'd be allocated out, as I believe the Carmarthen service will only need around 5 sets. That leaves 9 for 'extra capacity'. Unless they start doubling up a lot of other services, or off lease some of their current trains on the ECML route, that's a lot remaining.
The plan is to double up some sets at Lumo east coast and at Hull Trains
 

43102EMR

Established Member
Joined
28 Mar 2021
Messages
1,364
Location
UK
I suppose it is possible that they could take from the order already made. 14 trains is a lot, and it's always puzzled me how they'd be allocated out, as I believe the Carmarthen service will only need around 5 sets. That leaves 9 for 'extra capacity'. Unless they start doubling up a lot of other services, or off lease some of their current trains on the ECML route, that's a lot remaining.
They’ll be split 3 ways across Lumo EC, Hull Trains and Lumo GW. The main goal for the former 2 is to double up services and provide additional capacity
 

lrbvoyager

Member
Joined
2 Jan 2025
Messages
372
Are they all going to be bi mode and the same class? Or is HT getting more 802s,Lumo EC getting more pure electric 803s and Lumo GW getting some form of bi mode? Could anyone explain?
 

cj_1985

Member
Joined
6 Mar 2010
Messages
845
Location
Lanarkshire
Are they all going to be bi mode and the same class? Or is HT getting more 802s,Lumo EC getting more pure electric 803s and Lumo GW getting some form of bi mode? Could anyone explain?
My money would be on the Lumo GW units being Bi mode electric + Battery units (not like the 803s), such as has been mentioned for the Stirling service  IF their access agreement does get extended...

but reading through the responses on thr ORR site... reads like carbon copy DfT spec 'anti OAO' hate across the board on almost every point... doesn't fill me with confidence
 

JonathanH

Veteran Member
Joined
29 May 2011
Messages
23,277
My money would be on the Lumo GW units being Bi mode electric + Battery units (not like the 803s), such as has been mentioned for the Stirling service  IF their access agreement does get extended...

but reading through the responses on thr ORR site... reads like carbon copy DfT spec 'anti OAO' hate across the board on almost every point... doesn't fill me with confidence
Indeed, given the obvious threat to GBR from just the sentiment of comments in the House of Commons debate yesterday, open access is fairly likely not to continue. However, given one of the safeguards being put forward is TUPE of staff to GBR, it may be imagined that any rolling stock will have a future with GBR once the open access operators are gone.
 

cj_1985

Member
Joined
6 Mar 2010
Messages
845
Location
Lanarkshire
Why not order 7- or 9-car sets, if new? Or will some of the new units be stabled somewhere out of the peaks?
i would imagine that having units in 5 car formations offers options to , in the future, operate additional services, as well as add further capacity to existing services. If you order 9 cars, you'd be stuck with a long train and remove flexibility for operations
 

Russel

Established Member
Joined
30 Jun 2022
Messages
5,419
Location
Lichfield
but reading through the responses on thr ORR site... reads like carbon copy DfT spec 'anti OAO' hate across the board on almost every point... doesn't fill me with confidence

I don't understand the DFT point of view here, OAO are plugging gaps in the market that the TOC's aren't, if the DTF are so anti OAO, why are they not providing the TOC's with the funding to plug the gaps themselves?
 

ainsworth74

Forum Staff
Staff Member
Global Moderator
Joined
16 Nov 2009
Messages
31,074
Location
Redcar
Yes lets take the discussion of wider considerations around Open Access Operators to the new thread helpfully started by @Bletchleyite and keep this one to what we know is happening which is the order of new trains for First Group's stable of OAOs. Thanks!
 

Top