The presence of a lower quadrant semaphore in the background makes me question whether it is in Manchester. Perhaps its in Western territory?
The signal arms, post and cap also look LNWR.Lower Quadrant signals were the norm early on, but most railways gradually changed over to Upper Quadrants. Only the GWR stuck with Lower Quadrants.
The lamps may be LNWR style.
I wouldn’t be 100% on ruling out Manchester from the use of Manchester on the ad. They could have had a lot made all the same, regardless of the location where the advert was to be placed, or it could be a marketing thing - local pride kind of idea.And the "Manchester" on the Wagstaff advert suggests it isn't in Manchester itself (if it was within Manchester Deansgate/Ashton Old Road would be sufficient, you would imagine).
Navigating to the 1892-1914 25" , both Deansgate and Oxford Road were on curves. Oxford Road had one straight-ish platform but no platform on the track opposite this one.I can't work out whether the background is level with the railway or a roofscape. If the latter it could almost be Deansgate or a 2-platform Oxford Rd - if that station was ever just 2 platforms and a pair of through lines... NMS historical maps (https://maps.nls.uk/geo/find/#zoom=5.0&lat=56.00000&lon=-4.00000&layers=102&b=1&z=0&point=0,0) beckon...
It is a rural location somewhere - trees in the background - certainly not central Manchester. As you say it looks to be an 'economy' station (with no canopies) on a relatively minor route.Navigating to the 1892-1914 25" , both Deansgate and Oxford Road were on curves. Oxford Road had one straight-ish platform but no platform on the track opposite this one.
The lack of signalling is intriguing. Presumably the grand gent sitting on the chair is the Station Master. Surely there can't have been many stations which were not block posts, yet were significant enough to have a designated Station Master?It's curious that there is a signal for trains entering the further platform but not for trains leaving the nearer one. If there was a signal box here then there would normally be a "platform starter", which suggests to me that there is no signal box and the visible signal may be a distant for a box some way behind the camera. Before the 1920s distants were painted the same as stop signals so the only distinguishing feature would be the notch in the end of the arm, which isn't discernable one way or the other at the biggest magnification I can get here.
If my theory is correct then it would probably be a fairly minor station and the lack of canopies tends to support this. Also with no goods yard, which may narrow things down somewhat.
that's something else that's curious - the apparent stationmaster doesn't have a watch, the guy standing behind him does. Suggests the station master didn't despatch trains???The lack of signalling is intriguing. Presumably the grand gent sitting on the chair is the Station Master. Surely there can't have been many stations which were not block posts, yet were significant enough to have a designated Station Master?
LNWR Audenshaw Station, at Manchester Road? A mile or so from the Openshaw Piano shop. The station closed in 1919, there was no signal box, nearest was Ashton Moss Junction towards Denton, no sidings . All on an embankment , the ticket office and stationmaster's house still exist!
No ,you are wrong, Hooley Hill, on the Guide Bridge avoiding line was renamed Audenshaw (closed 1952) after the station I refer to was closed. I can see where the confusion is, both lines came together at Denton Junction , the one I refer to was on the line between Denton and Droylsden.No. Hooley Hill/Audenshaw station had a tunnel at one end and the line curved to the left at the other end.
I think that the piano advert indicates that the station is anywhere in the area where Manchester was where you went for major purchase, such as a piano, rather than Liverpool, Stoke, etc.
No ,you are wrong, Hooley Hill, on the Guide Bridge avoiding line was renamed Audenshaw (closed 1952) after the station I refer to was closed. I can see where the confusion is, both lines came together at Denton Junction , the one I refer to was on the line between Denton and Droylsden.
Is it possible the Station Master wasn't based at this station, but covered it as part of his responsibilities?The lack of signalling is intriguing. Presumably the grand gent sitting on the chair is the Station Master. Surely there can't have been many stations which were not block posts, yet were significant enough to have a designated Station Master?
I did think that, as it was one of the few stations I couldn't find a photo of online.LNWR Audenshaw Station, at Manchester Road? A mile or so from the Openshaw Piano shop. The station closed in 1919, there was no signal box, nearest was Ashton Moss Junction towards Denton, no sidings . All on an embankment , the ticket office and stationmaster's house still exist!
ETA, the trees in the background are in the grounds of Ryecroft Hall. Photo is looking towards Denton , station was accessed from Manchester Road, there was a white tile brick lined subway connecting the platform to Denton from the ticket office, still visible about 30 years ago until the retail park was built.
That plan just about shows platform buildings similar to the photo but I suppose many stations would be laid out like that. I have noted on here before about the LNWR building Audenshaw Station in anticipation of the Manchester Racecourse moving to here as the site in Salford was requisitioned for nos 9 and 10 dock of the Manchester Ship Canal. The move never happened and Audenshaw Station was a complete waste of money!Tameside Local Image Archive have a plan of Audenshaw Station (by Ryecroft Hall) but not an image unfortunately.
Tameside
(Search for Audenshaw Station).
It also has views of the overbridge on Manchester Road in the '70s.
If it is Audenshaw, what are the chances the photo was taken to mark its closure day in 1905? That would fit the clothing
(wiki gives a closure date of 1st May 1905, not 1909)
No Sunday service according to wikiQuick gives the closure date as 1 May 1905, with the Manchester Evening News of 17 April saying ‘after 30th of this month’. 1 May was a Monday, so presumably the last trains were on the Saturday before unless there was a Sunday service, which seems unlikely.