Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!
This is interesting. What is the relevant law which caps his legal costs? And this law also states that the cap no longer applies once it goes to the UK Supreme Court?
When Justice Lang ruled in favour of the project last October, I don't remember anyone pointing out that Whitby had further legal recourse. My question is regardless of which party wins the next ruling due on 21 Mar, does the losing party have further legal recourse? What a mess, we can't even...
Wouldn't it be better if Whitby just lost and exhausted all his legal options? If he wins, its another big question as to if he is declared a vexatious litigant. Also the chance of further delays and cost overruns that a ruling in Whitby's favour could cause. In contrast, by the mere act of...
Thanks for providing the case tracker link. I typed in Whitby and there are 2 cases "The Queen on the application of Whitby v The Secretary of State for Transport" and case type is 'permission to appeal'.
So no sign that Whitby's appeal has been publicly listed and he had 21 days to appeal which is already past? The status remains very unclear. Meanwhile, does work on the Chord have to stop again?
We are aware of an issue with emails from the Forum to Microsoft-based email accounts (hotmail/outlook/live.com email addresses). This is being looked into currently, thanks for your patience meanwhile.