• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Recent content by Technologist

  1. T

    What I think is wrong with current OHLE electrification practice

    Context is for kings: The Tesla Model S reached its first customer 14 years ago, the technology exists, works and has been replicated about 80 million time since then. In the first statement "improving battery technology" was a hopeful statement beholden to fundamental scientific progress in...
  2. T

    Batteries and the Geopolitical Situation

    There is absolutely no reason why a battery locomotive needs to replicate the precise range of a diesel. A practical range of 150 miles on electric would be enough to bridge the vast majority of gaps on the freight network. That's probably more in the region of 4-5 MWh of batteries and about 35...
  3. T

    Karl Bushby and the Channel Tunnel

    Precedent: Obviously Chris Froome goes a little faster but frankly they could have helped if that had wanted to, it just makes them look like arseholes. Given that massive externalities that the channel tunnel has imposed on the country as a whole there is a good argument that it should...
  4. T

    What I think is wrong with current OHLE electrification practice

    BEMU's might be vastly cheaper to maintain because it means that your depots don't need OHLE and any other procedures to deal with live wires/rails in them. If you sensibly distribute batteries and traction it might even be the case that every coach can be self powered and mobile in the depot.
  5. T

    Potential solutions for earth shifting after dry weather?

    If we look at monthly rainfall about 50mm is typical in drier bits of the UK, if we needed to replicate this on 5% of the network to a width of 10m we would be looking about 400,000 tonnes. That would be about 130 fully loaded tanker trains per month. Sounds pretty doable
  6. T

    New proposal for trans-Pennine road tunnel + reopening Woodhead

    They are slightly more advanced than that as they are coming from the background of actually planning this route when they were in government and they also have a business model and enough name recognition that I knew who they were before they proposed it. They are flying a kite but they aren’t...
  7. T

    New proposal for trans-Pennine road tunnel + reopening Woodhead

    I think the intent is to either collect tolls or for the investors to get paid per vehicle usage. Actually it might be an interesting way to do fund roads. Work out a benefit per user for a bunch of schemes set a minimum BCR for these schemes, let developers bid against these schemes. Private...
  8. T

    New proposal for trans-Pennine road tunnel + reopening Woodhead

    I've listened to Michael Dnes being interviewed on this project on the YIMBY podcast. He lead the team that looked at the tunnels when he was a civil servant. Someone mentioned drill and blast at the time but the people they had hired didn't know much about it and everybody assumed TBMs so they...
  9. T

    New proposal for trans-Pennine road tunnel + reopening Woodhead

    Anyone who thinks that support for Sizewell C from an engineering feasibility perspective is a negative for someone's professional competence shouldn't really be listened to either. - Source I'm a nuclear engineer. Issues like costal erosion are absolute bread and butter for nuclear developers...
  10. T

    The cost of living agenda - how should the railway contribute ?

    The whole premise of this thread is wrong, if you want to relieve an income distribution problem you achieve that by giving poor people money or by taxing them less. Trying to do it via anything else just results in distortion of markets and inefficiencies like paying someone’s fare that they...
  11. T

    What would a dream future cross-country train be like?

    Dream Cross Country Train: 9 car BEMU derived from off the shelf automotive componentry, transformer replaced by DC-DC converter. Carries 39 tonnes of batteries (6MWh) for a 150 mile range off wire at express speeds. It has 35MW (46,500bhp) from a pair of Lucid Air PM motors (32kg) per axle. It...
  12. T

    Could RAIB's reliance on the On-Train Monitoring Recorder (OTMR) data for the impact speed be wrong?

    I am acknowledging that the crash may well have been around 40mph (that crash test was at 37mph), see previous arguments as to why I was surprised by the lower number and severity of casualties given the high speed of the crash and the fact nobody is secured. Whilst crashes are unpredictable if...
  13. T

    Could RAIB's reliance on the On-Train Monitoring Recorder (OTMR) data for the impact speed be wrong?

    I will probably read that, I was coming at this from a perspective of if you crashed a car at 49mph into a stationary car without wearing a seatbelt you would be quite likely to suffer fatal injuries and the vehicles would be mashed. However I think the takeaways from here are: The crumple...
  14. T

    Could RAIB's reliance on the On-Train Monitoring Recorder (OTMR) data for the impact speed be wrong?

    Very interesting: I would compare the activation of the crumple zones on the following carriages here vs what we see at Bedford and infer that the impact was likely at a lower velocity. Obviously the designs of the trains aren't the same and we had what might be termed "incompatibility" with...
  15. T

    Could RAIB's reliance on the On-Train Monitoring Recorder (OTMR) data for the impact speed be wrong?

    I'm engineer, the worst possible bit of evidence is "if someone has said it it must be true" based on their reputation. I have no doubt that RAIB have a piece of telemetry that either ends at 49mph or a G meter reading that registers and impact when the rail vehicle was doing 49mph. I can think...

Top