Recent content by SWR commuter

I think we are nearing agreement then, insofar as no one can point to a concrete example of behaviour which would have led to an actionable report. Nor does it seem there is a consistent definition of the criteria for suspicion. It’s an interesting topic, because without a definition we’re...

Neither of these are concrete examples of what I have asked you for, namely a plausible scenario where this message would be actioned. You say as much yourself, when you state they did nothing which would really give cause for concern. Why would they? Reviewing CCTV after the event shows some...

The length and generality of your reply distracts from the central question: is there a plausible scenario where this message might be actioned and result in a practical contribution. The example doesn't seem compelling: I cannot imagine today's attacker needs to wander around taking photos of...

Your final point makes me wonder, did your colleagues each say "16 or 17 times" independently, or did one say 16 and the other say 17? Or is this number made up? If it's only 16 or 17 times, then the message can be removed quite soon, as the high proportion of regular passengers in the...

Your idea sounds implausible. The earlier stage, such as when he's at home preparing or planning online, should be addressed by activity from other agencies, rather than the traveling public. It is those activities that are an effective implementation of a counter terrorism strategy. My...

OMG it has recently started on SWR. I completely agree that tuning out is the obvious step. The message needs to be removed as pointless, unpleasant and patronising. The chance of harm from a terrorist attack is so statistically minuscule, and then compounded, the chance of BTP intervening...