Recent content by SuspectUsual

She was his Senior Counselor, not the press secretary

I think she's actually mk3, because Kayleigh McEnany at the end of his first administration was the prototype

Yes, sorry, typed in haste. The wider point still holds though

Not that I'm off to have a laser shone into one of my eyes shortly so it may be a while till I can see properly again, and this has probably run its course. So, 2, 3, 153, 156, 167 and 170 are the only legal finishes in darts that can only be achieved in one way (one dart or combination of...

NRCoT section 32.1 covers this, I think.

I'm 99% sure there was one in Dublin in the late 1980s

Ah, ok. But still no guarantee they'll be able to board The whole thing is absolute nonsense

But the reality is surely that what it'll actually do is give some people false expectations, not prevent them, because they'll get a ticket with a reservation and find they dont have a seat The only false expectation management is the people who get disappointed in a whole new way, by not...

Sorry if I'm reading this wrong, but are they saying that in order to get an itinerary including one of these trains you'll need a (counted place?) reservation, but once you have it that reservation is worthless, because it doesn't guarantee you a seat (nor even a place on the train if its...

Nope Each is individual Another clue - its as much a maths question as it is a darts question

No

All four of those statements are true, but none are the answer I’m looking for There is something that applies to all of them, regardless of the number of darts needed

Not three darts (as 2 and 3 are on the list) but it is to do with checkouts

Is the right answer to that part of the question. So, what links those numbers?

Yes, in relates to darts So what is the significance of those numbers and what other number completes the set?