Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!
does anybody know why ES have such all over the place carriage placement that seems too be different every trip?
you would expect a simple order of sleeper-couchette-seated but instead they seem to sandwich the sleeper carriages between couchette on both sides and sometimes a seated coach...
did a NoL set ever reach Scotland?, they did the white rose but not sure if they ever got further than the midlands?
a NoL would make more sense as they are shorter and have been in storage since 2014
dont think you even need 300km/h, in theory a 250km/h Stadler SMILE made too UK specs could work for way less
that or a tack on order too the HS2 fleet
ah yea, was using the ticket on my apple wallet that doesn’t store that
the pdf says 15:53 and that tracks with other sources, just strange that the Email gets it wrong as a UTC/BST issue would display as 14:53 instead
looks like somebody mixed up time zones
got a Avanti Train too Manchester later today and found the website shows the time of 15:53 but the email i got yesterday shows it as 16:53 instead
Website
(image shows 15:53 - 18:06 Euston to Manchester)
Email
(image shows 16:53 - 19:06 Euston to...
what i could see way more as an option (assume you had spare mark 5 carriages and added KVB too the class 92) would be a corridor train that rather than going all the way too Europe, ended up at the international side of St Pancras for direct connections too Eurostar/Virgin/etc
reduces scope...
lack of KVB also makes the French side tricky as well as nowhere in TVM land that can be used for a loco swap (i believe idea was for some AWS at Calais-Ville to enable that to be used)
if being realistic (as much as you can with such a idea), locomotive + carriages would not be the best option...
this is kind of my point
why are people talking of multi million pound HS1-HS2 links for a service that would never recover that money
look at whats possible for cheap now with existing infrastructure not what needs total rebuilds of what we already have too work
keep it simple, 1 maybe 2 200m...
as every North of London Service would need too use Classic compatible stock for anything bar Birmingham Services, do you really need too use HS2?
London - Paris is already only 2:20hr , using the WCML and the existing HS1 link only adds 2hr more for Manchester and even then that’s the same as...
not a full 16 as the carriages alone are 2m too long (353m platform vs 355m carriages) and once you factor in the 2 class 92's its too long but a 14 carriage reduce length consist would just about fit
website states
so don’t think they can avoid compensation but weirdly they show the train arriving into London 15 minutes early, assuming that’s got to be a time conversion typo
We are aware of an issue with emails from the Forum to Microsoft-based email accounts (hotmail/outlook/live.com email addresses). This is being looked into currently, thanks for your patience meanwhile.