Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!
Slab track is not necessarily the answer especially on soft formations prone to settlement, such as those found on much of GEML. If ballasted track settles, you just tip some more stone and tamp it back to level. If a slab track settles you are into a world of pain.
Each additional stop introduced further reduced the capacity of the route. An extra stop between Farnborough and Brookwood would probably have quite a severe effect on performance.
I have never hear of any plans for a Oxford - Gatwick service either. I cant see where it would ever fit in with all the other services that are planning to use Oxford and with the capacity constraints on the lines between there and here I cant see it ever happening.
All very nice but the problem with reinstating the chord between the Ascot-Ash Vale and SWML is that there is no capacity on SWML to take those trains unless a Basingstoke service is sacrificed, and you can guess how popular that would be.
Also the junction would need to be grade separated...
CWR does NOT have regular expansion gaps every few hundred metres. To prevent buckling it is stretched to the length it would be on a warm day before being welded up and fastened down. The whoosh you hear as a train approaches is because sound waves from the wheel sets travel much faster through...
it depends on usage of course but an overall figure of 30-35 years is a common assumption. Individual components may last less (eg 10yrs for rail, 15 for ballast).
We are aware of an issue with emails from the Forum to Microsoft-based email accounts (hotmail/outlook/live.com email addresses). This is being looked into currently, thanks for your patience meanwhile.