Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!
Interesting point, thank you! Given that such organisations rarely specify the more expensive option, I would guess that the bi-blocks were cheaper but have since proved to be a false economy?
Following the recent two-week closure of the Rochdale line I notice that all the newly installed track uses what appears to be standard-type concrete sleepers. Does this mean that Metrolink are moving away from the previous type which just has concrete pads under the rails with metal...
So was that the 9P77 to Blackpool North that I saw going over Sackville Street at about 5.05pm tonight? Not much fun for the passengers but at least a bit of variety for us pedestrians!
Totally agree. I think the Sheffield system is much better with a centre car all-seater and all the prams, wheelchair, cycles etc in the two end cars. Certainly the seats the M5000's do have are very unpleasant for the longer routes (if you're 'lucky' enough to get one)!
Apologies if I've missed mention of this elsewhere but I notice that the Clifton Road bridge over the old GC Ruddington Station site appears to have suffered a similar fate to the Musgrave Lane bridge (at least it looks that way on Google maps). As it's a larger road closer to built-up areas I'm...
That's excellent news (but I really must learn to read threads before posting - I've just seen the picture in post 17)! Let's just hope it's still in a reasonable condition and can be restored. It's a beautiful old building.
Hello again Matt,
My apologies for the above. Original issue seems to have cleared. Not sure if this was a site issue or just local to me at the time - but am stymied by character limit again. Original problem - a couple of images (one in the Sheffield derailment thread, one in the TfW 769...
Absolutely, couldn't agree more. Well done to all involved and I really hope they can keep up the momentum. I hate to be picky but I do wonder how much more could be achieved though if they'd only improve their PR a bit! Updates about the railway in general are a bit thin on the ground. I think...
Apologies for being a bit behind the times but I've only just caught up with this one! I was just curious because the article seems a little more thorough (certainly longer) than the usual local press efforts. Do we know Mr Partridge? He certainly gives this forum a mention.
And not just time either! The seating is completely unsuitable for that sort of distance. If TfGM are wanting to increase service distances they really should be looking at seating that doesn't induce DVT!!!
We are aware of an issue with emails from the Forum to Microsoft-based email accounts (hotmail/outlook/live.com email addresses). This is being looked into currently, thanks for your patience meanwhile.