HSTEd
Veteran Member
- Joined
- 14 Jul 2011
- Messages
- 20,269
The CEGB would also not run a grid so dysfunctionally that there were enormous constraints for transfer of power across the grid (and yes I know the CEGB didn't run the grid in Scotland, but I doubt NSHB or SSEB would have done so either!). This is another side effect of decoupling generation from transmission I think.As of todays 1700 settlement period virtually no gas was scheduled to dispatch due to high wind and solar output but because of the grid constraints in Scotland NESO has had dispatch multiple gas plants onto the system. Its paying c£30/MWhr to windfarms to shut down and £140/MWh to £215/MWh to CCGTs to ramp up. Yes price of gas is elevated due to Hormuz debacle but there is also a lot in the price to cover ramping up as CCGTs are only highly efficient when running stably at full load and they only get dispatched for 30mins. Of course reality is they will be redispatched every 30mins so are really taking advantage but thats market design.
Then the other nonsense we get is all but the French i/c's are in export mode currently as energy traders know that wholesale price would be depressed with forecast high renewable output so they bid to take that power and sell it in Europe. Thing is they dont have to pay the actual system costs for doing so. The battery operators equally benefit from low wholesale prices.
The CEGB would have run the system for least cost the current market design doesnt deliver that for consumers.
But this is the Thatcher-approved model that we are now stuck with for want of political drivers to eliminate it.


