Theres a different timetable this year, which consists of:The vep did norden shuttles last year and that's pretty exactly the same capacity as the tc so that reason doesn't make any sense,I would be possible someone has decided they don't want it to
No mention of a 93 now. There is a GBRf loco rostered - class unspecified, so it could be almost anything except a 93! (which are DRS)So is that the complete line up now, does anyone know if a Class 93 or indeed anything else coming? Will look at roster to see if that gives any clues!
Surely folk are more interested in just red-penning the locos, regardless of which bit of track they operate over?Not at all desirable if you are just going to clear the line for the air braked locos, which to be honest is the main reason most people will be going for
Well the GB one ,if the hype is to be believed,will probably be pen yes so any distance will do but speaking personally especially in pres I do like to do the full line with as many classes as possible, it does encourage me to travel to lines even though I don't need the loco involved, I had the bone on the mainline years ago but I've never had, or has anyone else, from norden to Swanage and to have the opportunity and fluff it for very weak reasons speaks of not understanding your market, why get a loco in to attract people and then restrict it because it might attract too many is, well insert your own words hereSurely folk are more interested in just red-penning the locos, regardless of which bit of track they operate over?
Personally, I would rather travel on a train where I have a seat or at least a window over a shorter section of line then be rammed onto a train for a greater distance. If the train is too busy, you can barely tell what's on the front of it. Imo it makes a lot more sense to have the shorter set on the stopping services. It will spread out the loading of the TC and air locos by calling at all stations. By doing 10 odd round trips a day there are loads more chances to travel on the TC. If it was on River trains, the number of round trips would be halved, so crowding would be almost doubled.Well the GB one ,if the hype is to be believed,will probably be pen yes so any distance will do but speaking personally especially in pres I do like to do the full line with as many classes as possible, it does encourage me to travel to lines even though I don't need the loco involved, I had the bone on the mainline years ago but I've never had, or has anyone else, from norden to Swanage and to have the opportunity and fluff it for very weak reasons speaks of not understanding your market, why get a loco in to attract people and then restrict it because it might attract too many is, well insert your own words here
I didn't say river, going to some random point in the middle of nowhere is zero interest a station say norden yes pleasePersonally, I would rather travel on a train where I have a seat or at least a window over a shorter section of line then be rammed onto a train for a greater distance. If the train is too busy, you can barely tell what's on the front of it. Imo it makes a lot more sense to have the shorter set on the stopping services. It will spread out the loading of the TC and air locos by calling at all stations. By doing 10 odd round trips a day there are loads more chances to travel on the TC. If it was on River trains, the number of round trips would be halved, so crowding would be almost doubled.
As @158760 has said, the difference timetable this year does not allow going to Norden on the Shuttle whilst still maintaining the hourly frequency. I suspect going to Norden would end up in severe late running. There isn't too much of a wait to connect with the River trains for those who need to get to Norden.I didn't say river, going to some random point in the middle of nowhere is zero interest a station say norden yes please
So the issue for you is that the air braked services turn back at Corfe and don’t do the 3/4 of a mile to Norden on Friday and Saturday? The timetable is designed to provide a frequent service to the Beer Festival at Corfe, so the limitations of it mean it’s impossible to run the shuttle through to Norden.I didn't say river, going to some random point in the middle of nowhere is zero interest a station say norden yes please
It's about 30 minutes. You could walk to Norden (and back!) in that time. There isn't too much of a wait to connect with the River trains for those who need to get to Norden.
Yeah but walking isn't travelling on the line is it, I'm fully aware how far it is and how easy it is, just not by the main visiting locos apparentlyIt's about 30 minutes. You could walk to Norden (and back!) in that time
Quite so - but I was responding to a comment about connections, for people who need to get to Norden.Yeah but walking isn't travelling on the line is it, I'm fully aware how far it is and how easy it is, just not by the main visiting locos apparently
My bad sorry, I really can't see why a loco class that has never worked the line before is stopped from doing the full line, makes no sense at allQuite so - but I was responding to a comment about connections, for people who need to get to Norden.
An example from elsewhere comes to mind. When the well tanks visited the GWSR last year, they only ran one service a day from Toddington to Winchcombe. That seems reasonable imo. You can't put a well tank on a 15 mile or however long the line is journey. As someone with experience of timetabling on a heritage railway, it’s not a simple process and you are regularly unable to do what you would wish to do.My bad sorry, I really can't see why a loco class that has never worked the line before is stopped from doing the full line, makes no sense at all
Another example of this is at the GWSR this year, with the GWR railcar, that it’s only doing small parts of the line on most days.An example from elsewhere comes to mind. When the well tanks visited the GWSR last year, they only ran one service a day from Toddington to Winchcombe. That seems reasonable imo. You can't put a well tank on a 15 mile or however long the line is journey. As someone with experience of timetabling on a heritage railway, it’s not a simple process and you are regularly unable to do what you would wish to do.
Which is what happens on Sunday, with the 4TC running over the road and Set B shortened to 4 coaches to form the Corfe shuttle. This is a first for us this year, so will be interesting to see how well it works and how popular it is.Another example of this is at the GWSR this year, with the GWR railcar, that it’s only doing small parts of the line on most days.
In Swanage’s case, the best solution would have probably been a full length air-braked coach set as one of the main diagrams, with a short Mk1 set on Corfe terminators instead of the 4-TC. It’s a real shame that there are hardly any air/dual-braked Mk1s in preservation.
But it does do the full line on the Sunday, when passenger volume and diagramming allows it to do so. I have quite reasonably explained multiple times why the service pattern is the way it is, and you’ve either ignored me or said my reasoning is weak.My bad sorry, I really can't see why a loco class that has never worked the line before is stopped from doing the full line, makes no sense at all
What I mean is, have a full length air/dual Mk1 set, so that the 58 and other air only locos can do the full line on all 3 days, without having issues with capacity.Which is what happens on Sunday, with the 4TC running over the road and Set B shortened to 4 coaches to form the Corfe shuttle. This is a first for us this year, so will be interesting to see how well it works and how popular it is.
Sorry, I worded that part of my reply poorly - I agree there should be a longer air braked set so there can be higher capacity services across the weekend. I can only presume it comes down to money and that’s why there’s not a hired dual/air set from someone like West Coast.What I mean is, have a full length air/dual Mk1 set, so that the 58 and other air only locos can do the full line on all 3 days, without having issues with capacity.
They tend to be feasible if you are in the right part of the train. Front end of the train approaching Swanage if it goes in the bay. Rear end of a train approaching Swanage if it is going in the main platform. The shorter 4-TC train is most likely to use the bay.How feasible are the three-minute connections at Swanage (to switch from Set A or B to the 4-TC)?
Thursday for 73141 and the 4-TCAny information regarding timings of the 4TC ad other visiting locos?
The move on Wednesday is reported on HOPS as formed of 37607+20066+26007+45041+58023. Unless I’ve missed something I believe the move on Thursday is 73119+GBRF engine+4TC.Thursday for 73141 and the 4-TC
5Z73 1544 Eastleigh Works Gbrf to Swanage
https://www.realtimetrains.co.uk/service/gb-nr:K65461/2026-05-07/detailed
Wednesday for 37607, 58023 and 45041
0Z37 0900 Barrow Hill L.I.P. to Loughborough Brush
https://www.realtimetrains.co.uk/service/gb-nr:R43855/2026-05-06/detailed
0Z38 1100 Loughborough Brush to Orton Mere
https://www.realtimetrains.co.uk/service/gb-nr:R43854/2026-05-06/detailed
0Z39 1334 Orton Mere to Swanage
https://www.realtimetrains.co.uk/service/gb-nr:R43853/2026-05-06/detailed
They’re absolutely fine as long as long as you stay towards the rear of trains originating from the River Frome/Norden (A/B), and the front of trains originating from Corfe (TC). We tend to wait until everyone has changed trains anyway, otherwise it’s a nightmare with people trying to board whilst you’re trying to dispatch the train.How feasible are the three-minute connections at Swanage (to switch from Set A or B to the 4-TC)?
There was a suggestion of a different 73 on the Branch Line Society Gen page - https://branchline.uk/gen.php - but note that the railway itself is still advertising 73119 as having been requested.Unless I’ve missed something I believe the move on Thursday is 73119+GBRF engine+4TC.
Thursday 07th, Friday 08th, Saturday 09th & Sunday 10th May 2026
Swanage Railway Diesel Gala
45041 is rostered to work the preview day on the Thursday
The following visitors have been announced 20066, 26007, 37607, 45041, 58023, 73141 and a chance of a Class 99(?)
The following locos are expected to work from the home fleet 33012 and 33053
The beerex on Friday is expected to be hauled by 20066 and on Saturday night by 26007
I think they’ve just misread the timetable, because the attached public timetable has 73119 listed, with no mention of 73141.There was a suggestion of a different 73 on the Branch Line Society Gen page - https://branchline.uk/gen.php - but note that the railway itself is still advertising 73119 as having been requested.
Many thanks @JonathanH and @158760! I shall ensure I am in the correct part of the train.The move on Wednesday is reported on HOPS as formed of 37607+20066+26007+45041+58023. Unless I’ve missed something I believe the move on Thursday is 73119+GBRF engine+4TC.
The return working for the GBRF stuff plus the TC is on Monday, but timings are not yet in. I believe the move back to Barrow Hill will be the same as the outbound but minus the 20, which is staying until 2027.
They’re absolutely fine as long as long as you stay towards the rear of trains originating from the River Frome/Norden (A/B), and the front of trains originating from Corfe (TC). We tend to wait until everyone has changed trains anyway, otherwise it’s a nightmare with people trying to board whilst you’re trying to dispatch the train.
Now cancelled, was perhaps ambitious starting in Derby, then West London, and moving to Weymouth after Swanage and return same day. So limited time for those who wanted to see the gala.Saturday railtour with 66 and 73 locos and MK2 coaches