• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Great Northern Class 387/1 - fitment of Alstom onboard ETCS

TT-ONR-NRN

Veteran Member
Joined
30 Dec 2016
Messages
12,755
Location
Worcester
Don’t forget the recent tender for GWR EMUs was for 30 x 4 car sets, there’s currently 33 x 4 car 387s on lease to GWR so whatever the outcome of that tender is/was means there will be at least 3 x 387 surplus.
Without wanting to stray off topic too much (although it's relevant if it directly impacts the GN 387s which are the subject of this thread), do we know the outcome of that tender yet?
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

HamworthyGoods

Established Member
Joined
15 Jan 2019
Messages
4,468
Which would make sense, but minus removing the last /2, didn’t think Great Northern needed any more 387s in all honesty.

Presumably allows a couple of 387/2s to transfer to Brighton and bin off a couple more 313 diagrams.

On the other post people think it’s going to be a huge cascade to kill 313s involving 379s, in reality Southern will just keep on chipping away at the diagrams till there’s none left.

== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==

Without wanting to stray off topic too much (although it's relevant if it directly impacts the GN 387s which are the subject of this thread), do we know the outcome of that tender yet?

Not seen anything, but it’s fairly safe to assume they’ll be a minimum of 3 x 387s surplus.
 

43102EMR

Established Member
Joined
28 Mar 2021
Messages
1,363
Location
UK
Presumably allows a couple of 387/2s to transfer to Brighton and bin off a couple more 313s.

On the other post people think it’s going to be a huge cascade to kill 313s involving 379s, in reality Southern will just keep on chipping away at the diagrams till there’s none left.
There’s only one /2 left with GN, 387201. Guess anything else for them is a bonus for multiple working/spare unit purposes.

== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==

Without wanting to stray off topic too much (although it's relevant if it directly impacts the GN 387s which are the subject of this thread), do we know the outcome of that tender yet?
GWR recently issued a maintenance contract for the 387s, so safe to assume at least 30 are staying put.
 

HamworthyGoods

Established Member
Joined
15 Jan 2019
Messages
4,468
There’s only one /2 left with GN, 387201. Guess anything else for them is a bonus for multiple working/spare unit purposes.

== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==


GWR issued a maintenance contract for the 387s, so safe to assume at least 30 are staying put.

Logically that 387/2 will then join its friends south of the river and another 313 diagram bites the dust!
 

Siemens Staines

Established Member
Joined
30 Jul 2015
Messages
1,483
Posted elsewhere that the number of 313 diagrams reduces from 13 to 9 with the December timetable change, so 12 fewer vehicles. Three 387s is 12 vehicles, so if the three surplus to GWR move to GTR for an internal cascade (GN/GX/SN) to replace those 12 vehicles, then it all balances, but I have probably added two and two and got five?
 

zwk500

Veteran Member
Joined
20 Jan 2020
Messages
18,420
Location
Northampton
Posted elsewhere that the number of 313 diagrams reduces from 13 to 9 with the December timetable change, so 12 fewer vehicles. Three 387s is 12 vehicles, so if the three surplus to GWR move to GTR for an internal cascade (GN/GX/SN) to replace those 12 vehicles, then it all balances, but I have probably added two and two and got five?
Are GTR definitely looking to get rid of the 313s then?
 

Siemens Staines

Established Member
Joined
30 Jul 2015
Messages
1,483
My error, I have just re-read the 313 thread again and it is three diagrams they lose with the timetable change, not four. This was confirmed only last Saturday, so I presume this must be independent of any ex SE 377s, which has been known for months won't be happening due to the 701s etc. If 313s lose diagrams, but the same number of units remain operational, then this would seem profligate in todays financial environment. I would have thought it more likely that some 313s remain with GTR as spare parts donors for the rest of the fleet, so GTR may not have got rid of them, but they would be unlikely to ever work again either. The thread says the three diagrams will be 377s, so 387s from GWR to GN, for 387 to SN/GX, for 377 to replace 313, or some alternative permutation, would seem plausible?

I am not entirely sure how GWR cope with three fewer units, but there must have been a plan for 30 4-car units when the tender was issued. In practice, it is only two fewer units because 387174 had been out of service for 90% of the past year during which time GWR effectively only had 32 units to operate the current diagrams.
 

43102EMR

Established Member
Joined
28 Mar 2021
Messages
1,363
Location
UK
My error, I have just re-read the 313 thread again and it is three diagrams they lose with the timetable change, not four. This was confirmed only last Saturday, so I presume this must be independent of any ex SE 377s, which has been known for months won't be happening due to the 701s etc. If 313s lose diagrams, but the same number of units remain operational, then this would seem profligate in todays financial environment. I would have thought it more likely that some 313s remain with GTR as spare parts donors for the rest of the fleet, so GTR may not have got rid of them, but they would be unlikely to ever work again either. The thread says the three diagrams will be 377s, so 387s from GWR to GN, for 387 to SN/GX, for 377 to replace 313, or some alternative permutation, would seem plausible?

I am not entirely sure how GWR cope with three fewer units, but there must have been a plan for 30 4-car units when the tender was issued. In practice, it is only two fewer units because 387174 had been out of service for 90% of the past year during which time GWR effectively only had 32 units to operate the current diagrams.
If 174 is indeed one of the ones going to GN, I’m surprised it never moved straight away from Ilford to Hornsey; that’s one thing perplexing me about this potential move.
 

FGW_DID

Established Member
Joined
23 Jun 2011
Messages
3,033
Location
81D & 81E
I wouldn't be suprised if the 12 HeX and 2 GWR 387s got changed to Alstom ETCS should they ever leave HeX.
Only the 12 HEX 387 had ETCS fitted. None of the ‘Green Fleet’ are fitted.

== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==

I am not entirely sure how GWR cope with three fewer units, but there must have been a plan for 30 4-car units when the tender was issued. In practice, it is only two fewer units because 387174 had been out of service for 90% of the past year during which time GWR effectively only had 32 units to operate the current diagrams.

387172, 173 & 174 are the likely candidates.
There’ll be a couple of 387 working diagrams disappearing, whether all those workings will just be absorbed into the remaining 387 diagrams or end up with another traction I don’t know!
 
Last edited:

D365

Veteran Member
Joined
29 Jun 2012
Messages
13,159
As per my previous comment, the remaining GWR 387s (i.e. those that didn’t get the Heathrow conversion) will eventually be fitted with Alstom ETCS.
 

Fincra5

Established Member
Joined
6 Jun 2009
Messages
2,636
As per my previous comment, the remaining GWR 387s (i.e. those that didn’t get the Heathrow conversion) will eventually be fitted with Alstom ETCS.
Which makes sense for the extension of ETCS to Pad!
 
Joined
2 Nov 2023
Messages
32
Location
Kent
5Q39 CANCELLED

Believed to be a defect on 387101
I was on a 717 returning to Moorgate and caught it at Harringay Up Rev Sdgs where it was parked. The pantograph was up and 57 310 was not in sight.
 

Attachments

  • 20250729_144804.jpg
    20250729_144804.jpg
    2.5 MB · Views: 114
  • 20250729_144844.jpg
    20250729_144844.jpg
    2.1 MB · Views: 109
  • 20250729_144810.jpg
    20250729_144810.jpg
    3 MB · Views: 110
  • 20250729_144812.jpg
    20250729_144812.jpg
    2.2 MB · Views: 115

Pep and co

Member
Joined
17 May 2019
Messages
322
Any further updates regarding 387101?
Will it be making the journey to Derby at all now?

Thanks for any updates
 

PointA Rail

Member
Joined
31 Oct 2024
Messages
83
Location
London
I was on a 717 returning to Moorgate and caught it at Harringay Up Rev Sdgs where it was parked. The pantograph was up and 57 310 was not in sight.
Yes, 57310 after arriving with 379018, it left Hornsey Depot on 0Q39 about 45 mins after scheduled departure. Not sure where it went to though as I stopped following it on Traksy after passing Hitchin, presumably to Peterborough or Leicester Depot.
 

Southern Dvr

Member
Joined
13 Oct 2010
Messages
988
Yes, 57310 after arriving with 379018, it left Hornsey Depot on 0Q39 about 45 mins after scheduled departure. Not sure where it went to though as I stopped following it on Traksy after passing Hitchin, presumably to Peterborough or Leicester Depot.
Leicester L.I.P
 

GEC465

Member
Joined
10 Mar 2016
Messages
413

Intercity_225

Member
Joined
13 Jan 2024
Messages
590
Location
March
Hello! As I'm sure alot of you know 387101 has been gone for a couple of years for ETCS training. However, I'm unsure where it is now. Is it at Derby Litchurch Lane, Old Dalby or even at Hornsey? Cheers :)
 

800001

Established Member
Joined
24 Oct 2015
Messages
7,307
Hello! As I'm sure alot of you know 387101 has been gone for a couple of years for ETCS training. However, I'm unsure where it is now. Is it at Derby Litchurch Lane, Old Dalby or even at Hornsey? Cheers :)
I believe it to still beat Old Dalby.
@Joel_1902 can you advise?
 

St. Paddy

Member
Joined
11 Sep 2019
Messages
718
Location
Hitchin
Nearly 3.5 years since it first left Hornsey. I wonder if they’ll ever get it to work with the ETCS
 

Top