Bletchleyite
Veteran Member
My twopennorth - leave Cambridge as it is and since the two new stations have yet to open, just to rename them South Cambridge and North Cambridge.
Cambridge North is already open.
My twopennorth - leave Cambridge as it is and since the two new stations have yet to open, just to rename them South Cambridge and North Cambridge.
As I understand it they are pronounced differently - Gillingham (Wilts) is a hard 'G'Confusion might be reduced if every station had a unique name. I heard of someone once who used a return ticket from Gillingham to Gillingham to commute for a week from Salisbury to Waterloo!
Cambridge North is already open.
Correct, the Kent one is more 'Jillingham'. Doesn't help if written down, of course!As I understand it they are pronounced differently - Gillingham (Wilts) is a hard 'G'
For what purpose? Having North Cambridge/Cambridge/South Cambridge is no less confusing than Cambridge North/Cambridge/Cambridge South.Ah, yes so it is. Rename it anyway!
Meldreth and Broxbourne were Meldreth and Melbourn and Broxbourne and Hoddesdon until the early 1970s.Other possibles could be Meldreth for Melbourn, Radley for Abingdon, Campsea Ashe for Wickham Market, Rye House for Hoddesdon.
I considered and rejected both of these. Hills Road and Botanic Gardens are too far away to make sense for locals and with insufficient name recognition for visitors.As it's very much not central I'd go for Cambridge Hills Road. Cambridge Botanic Gardens sounds like a local tram stop not the main station, but Hills Rd is the one that takes you into the city centre if you follow station road up.
It is a bit late for that, Cambridge North has been open since 2017 and Cambridge South opens early in 2026.My twopennorth - leave Cambridge as it is and since the two new stations have yet to open, just to rename them South Cambridge and North Cambridge.
Under the EWR consolidated stations option Woburn Sands is moved a bit to the west and could easily be renamed. There will also be a case for renaming Ridgmont with a Milton Keynes name: this is likely to get lots of Milton Keynes traffic from/to Cambridge because of its proximity to the M1 and A421.The Milton Keynes South name could arguably be better applied to Bow Brickhill or Woburn Sands (or a future EWR station between them)
If all three begin with 'Cambridge' it is surely more confusing than if two of them begin with a different word?For what purpose? Having North Cambridge/Cambridge/South Cambridge is no less confusing than Cambridge North/Cambridge/Cambridge South.
If all three begin with 'Cambridge' it is surely more confusing than if two of them begin with a different word?
Worth noting the now-quietened plan to rename North Llanrwst to North Llanrwst & Trefriw, despite Trefriw being a 30 minute walk from the station.
I thought that 'Baltic' was named after the sea of that name. Presumably there was once a Baltic Dock in that area?
Baltic is short for Baltic Triangle, an area which saw a concentration of businesses that traded with the Baltic Sea area, particularly in timber, and also provided services for Scandinavian emigrants heading for the New World. In the nineteenth and early twentieth century many Scandinavians and north Germans crossed the North Sea to the British East Coast, particularly to Hull, and then travelled by rail to ports for America, particularly Liverpool, before crossing the Atlantic. Some settled in the area: the word scouse derives from the Scandinavian or Baltic dish lobscouse.
By convention*, the first letter of the CRS code for a National Rail station should be the first letter of the full station name. When the codes were first allocated in the early 1980s, the London terminals didn't show a London prefix in retail and operating systems, hence Kings Cross is KGX and not (for instance) LKX.Why would you need to change the CRS code? At some point we’re going to open a station where all meaningful codes have already been used and the CRS code will have to be completely unrelated to the name (I’m not a CRS code nerd - it may well already be the case)
It's Worcestershire Parkway as it is not part of the "Worcester" stations groups for fares purposes.I don’t particularly like Worcestershire Parkway. Worcester Parkway would make more sense. And I would prefer East Midlands Airport (Parkway) - instead of East Midlands Parkway but it needs a regular bus link to the airport.
I have always objected to "St Albans Abbey" considering "St Albans City" is only marginally further away from the Abbey than the Abbey station is. I can't think of another name though.
Agree, St Albans Abbey would make perfect sense with St Albans City.St Albans West would be the easy one. Or St Albans Verulamium, seeing as it's adjacent to the park of that name (yes, I know that is basically like saying "St Albans St Albans" as that's its former name). I don't see a problem with the name as it is though.
Agree, St Albans Abbey would make perfect sense with St Albans City.
Cambridge North has been open for 8 years!My twopennorth - leave Cambridge as it is and since the two new stations have yet to open, just to rename them South Cambridge and North Cambridge.
I am tired of having the shared identity with Hayes & Harlington.
That always runs the risk of them falling out of favour as society’s attitudes change. Not saying it applies to these three - although the first almost certainly benefitted from exploitative child labour…
For 21st century Cambridge the old station is excellently located, as demonstrated by the businesses located around it and its 10 million annual entrances and exits.
But I do agree that it needs a better name. Central actually works for business travellers, the area around the station is what would be called the Central Business District (CBD) in the USA or Australia. But I wouldn't go for Central because it works less well for tourists, even though it is the station that they need to use.
These names are very popular amongst light rail fans who use them as names for lines they have drawn on a map with different coloured crayons (though you forgot Newton).
But names of famous people don't help visitors to differentiate between the stations and work out which they need to use. That's why the old station needs an English equivalent of the German hauptbahnhof.
It wasn't impossible with Llandudno Junction or Halwill Junction.I wonder if (political impossibility aside) it would be cheaper and simpler to rename some of these tiny settlements after their station...
Were they renamed or did new settlements develop around the stations of said name? Similar things happened with Berwick (Sussex), built a couple of miles from the village, but a settlement of Berwick Station now is around the station.It wasn't impossible with Llandudno Junction or Halwill Junction.
Most locals call SAC 'St Albans' station, and the other one (SAA) the 'Abbey Station'.That's what most people call it anyway, its station code is even SAC and it appears on the Worldline CIS as St Albans City. Just not *quite* everywhere.
Okehampton Exchange sounds a bit more traditional railway wise. Think of Bradford or Wrexham.Why ‘Exchange’?
It wasn't impossible with Llandudno Junction or Halwill Junction.
Yes, I wouldn't be bothering with the Gillinghams or the Newports. But I think the Rainhams are a different matter at only 20 miles apart (I do realise they are normally suffixed appropriately, but they certainly confused me until I realised they were two different places).If it was London L St and Liverpool L St I could at least have seen the logic....
== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==
Then you'd end up with stations being assigned names of seemingly questionable relevance (at best) while some settlement 200 miles away kept their name.
Wouldn't the outbound portion be valid for one day only?
I think i would change the 3 pontefract stations, Pontefract Monkhill, Pontefract Tanshelf & Pontefract Baghill.
These three stations are so weirdly named im sure there are some reasons out there for it but surely there are better ones,
I live not far away from these stations (roughly half an hour give or take) and i still wouldnt be able to pin-point which is which on a map
If anyone knows why these stations are named like this id really appreciate it
Tanshelf may take its name from a suburb, but that station is now the best sited of the three for the town centre. Next best is Baghill with its rather limited service, but it's Monkhill (stuck up a back lane near some allotments on the very edge of town) that has an intercity service to London.Monkhill Lane is a major road leading out of the town centre northbound; Baghill Road its equivalent southbound.
Tanshelf is actually just a suburb of Pontefract, but that's a bit of an uncommon way of naming a station (prefixing with the wider conurbation's name). Warrington doesn't have 'Warrington Sankey' and Chester doesn't have 'Chester Bache'.