Class15
Established Member
Thank you dk1!Yes. Known as the Down Avoider.
Thank you dk1!Yes. Known as the Down Avoider.
Thank you dk1!
I’ve organised plenty of cab passes for NWR staff to ride in the cabs of the TOC I worked for, no ‘ticket’ required.Fair enough, if that what you’ve been told, although that just seems absolutely ridiculous (and personally whenever I have someone from NR in the cab it wouldn’t occur to me to ask for a ticket!)! I suppose I should know better than to be surprised by anything in this industry.
Route learning cab passes given by TOCs to drivers don’t need to be accompanied by tickets, or at least I’ve never heard of such a requirement.
It is in fact true that NR staff undertaking any duties other than those deemed as immediately operational (IE for example a MOM cab riding a section) are meant to have tickets and it does say as such on my TOC's policies.
However it doesn't say who will check said tickets because the driver certainly isn't going to and neither is the guard.
I’ve organised plenty of cab passes for NWR staff to ride in the cabs of the TOC I worked for, no ‘ticket’ required.
Email chain stating reason for the cab pass/ride, linking in with the driver management team to make them aware there would be someone riding in cab.
It is in fact true that NR staff undertaking any duties other than those deemed as immediately operational (IE for example a MOM cab riding a section) are meant to have tickets and it does say as such on my TOC's policies.
However it doesn't say who will check said tickets because the driver certainly isn't going to and neither is the guard.
It strikes me that the world has gone mad (or at least in this country). Anybody on official business is welcome in my cab and I struggle to remember the colour of cab passes let alone check a stupid ticket.
Same here. The reason I went to the ROC I was able to visit was because of a signaller I’d had in the cab and he was good enough to invite me to his workplace in return.
To anyone who signs the route it is absolutely clear what it means. Ilford has a flyover for the Electric lines and the main goes under them. There is an up and down avoider line that can be used to switch between the main and E lines.Regarding the incident in the report, I would expect the relevant signal to have a left feather, making it quite apparent you are turning off, rather than a bland 2-character code for a turnoff that many drivers on that route have never taken. I wonder when the driver was last told what "DA" there means; it's not particularly intuitive, is it?
It’s worth getting out into a few cabs if you can - I spent a day in a ROC early last year and it was incredibly useful.
I've always understood that not all PSRs have warning boards and only those that feature a reduction of more than a third of line speed have an AWS magnet associated with the warning board although I'm happy to be corrected.
More generally, one might consider once again looking at fatigue issues here. The report implies that the same driver was booked to take the train from Abbey Wood - T5 - Shenfield, presumably with c. 10-15 mins to change ends at T5, on a diagram that began at 0433, ie. 3.5 hours before the incident but with no obvious break. Are the EL diagrams really this long?
Despite having had the rare luxury of a signaller briefing them about the signalled route that the train was going to take.It seems the driver simply didn't know the route well enough.
Every few years, our mandatory yearly training courses for drivers take place at an operations centre. This is an opportunity to exchange ideas with the signallers working there and to ask and answer questions. These are generally the best training days, even if the focus is not always on imparting ‘hard’ knowledge as is usually the case.I’ve always had a good relationship with signallers. Maybe that’s because I once was oneAlways good to see it from each others point of view too.
Every few years, our mandatory yearly training courses for drivers take place at an operations centre. This is an opportunity to exchange ideas with the signallers working there and to ask and answer questions. These are generally the best training days, even if the focus is not always on imparting ‘hard’ knowledge as is usually the case.
I've never been into a box/roc/control apart from by my own initiativeI think ours only get that during the initial training. I certainly haven’t been taken to any signal box since 1998 as part of training although during engineering blocks we pop into some for a cuppa and a catch up.
We don't really have many signal boxes left. It is all centralised with very limited and secured access. There are however guided tours available for the public. They show you how the Rail Control System works on the training platform and you can have a look into the command room from a viewing platform behind a window.I think ours only get that during the initial training. I certainly haven’t been taken to any signal box since 1998 as part of training although during engineering blocks we pop into some for a cuppa and a catch up.

We don't really have many signal boxes left. It is all centralised with very limited and secured access. There are however guided tours available for the public. They show you how the Rail Control System works on the training platform and you can have a look into the command room from a viewing platform behind a window.
View attachment 173641
Yes they can be, but it’s the continuous driving time that matters. Although they booked on at 0433, the first train from Plumstead doesn’t depart until past 0500. You can have 4 hours of continuous driving before a short break is needed, 4.5 hrs for full PNB but those are of course limits and most are diagrammed in before that point. This driver would have been due a break at Shenfield.
Every few years, our mandatory yearly training courses for drivers take place at an operations centre. This is an opportunity to exchange ideas with the signallers working there and to ask and answer questions. These are generally the best training days, even if the focus is not always on imparting ‘hard’ knowledge as is usually the case.
I think ours only get that during the initial training. I certainly haven’t been taken to any signal box since 1998 as part of training although during engineering blocks we pop into some for a cuppa and a catch up.
Thing is with shift patterns as this (alternating with weeks of lates) fatigue is always going to be a challenge. Things are improving but there’s still more to do.
On a note I think trainee drivers need to have visits to signalling centres / ROCs to meet signallers / controllers embedded in their programme. Some do, but those I am aware of have done it really earlier in their training before they've even got onto traction so it's a bit wasted at that phase.
I went on a pair of class 315s that did something similar. It was dark and the driver took it very cautiously. I think she was a trainee because there were two people in the cab.Someone upthread mentioned how 'mundane' shuttling up and down the same line day in, day out could cause loss of concentration. Very true. But this trip was far from mundane. This was a down train routed onto the up main on leaving Stratford and then stopping on a fenced off platform at Maryland before then joining the down main, so still off normal route. Surely you'd be sitting up and taking notice at this stage.
Same at the TOC I trained at (we visited London Bridge PSB, now long gone!). I found it absolutely fascinating, but that was because I was a something of a train geek before joining the industry, so understood what I was looking at.
On my ROC visit the signaller I mentioned above spoke about how useless those early visits are in his opinion, as people have very little concept of what they’re being shown. The example he gave was where someone asks “what do all those red lights mean”, it’s hard to have a meaningful conversation while also operating a live grade 9 signalling workstation! It would be much better to arrange these visits for qualified drivers where they have at least some knowledge.
In an ideal world there’d be (at least) two, once at the start and then once around pass out. Sort of “basic” and “detailed” views. I remember going on my first set of cab rides not long after signalling school and I didn’t take as much from them as the latter ones eitherIt would be much better to arrange these visits for qualified drivers where they have at least some knowledge.
There is an argument that it is these less-frequently used routes that require even better-maintained/placed signs so as to assist drivers who are less familiar with that routeing.If an operational incident had occured, control would inform an On-Call manager. The On-Call driver manager would speak to the driver (probably on arrival at Shenfield) and then report back about whether the driver needed to be relieved / continue duty etc.
That is then down to what the expert (the on-call driver manager) deems suitable, not control. It may be that the driver was unaware of what they had actually done and therefore that is what was reported back. If I recall when the initial notification came out of an RAIB investigation it was some time after the incident - we're talking weeks - because I don't think anyone was able to connect the dots until perhaps a train download had been completed and report to RAIB.
The Down Avoider is generally only used disruption and occasionally during late night (after 2300) two track closures. This driver had a particularly odd routing as it served Maryland P3.
Where are the levers...?We don't really have many signal boxes left. It is all centralised with very limited and secured access. There are however guided tours available for the public. They show you how the Rail Control System works on the training platform and you can have a look into the command room from a viewing platform behind a window.
View attachment 173641
Where they belong, in the museum.Where are the levers...?