I understand it's slightly more than the 60 10-cars that are required, around 65.Wondering how many 701s are required for the current timetable really is not off-topic at all. So if anyone can answer that would be great.![]()
I understand it's slightly more than the 60 10-cars that are required, around 65.Wondering how many 701s are required for the current timetable really is not off-topic at all. So if anyone can answer that would be great.![]()
Think it was some of the 30 5 car trains would often work as 10 car.The closest we may get to pre covid levels would be on Tuesday through Thursday.
Anyone using SWR on Monday and Friday will notice footfall just isn't there and it's often possible to get a seat on most peak time trains.
Maybe a possibility of the pre covid timetable on Tue - Thu?
Unless AI rapidly kills off office work wont general economic and population growth inevitably take commuting back to pre pandemic levels?Commuting is never going to increase to pre-pandemic levels
Hybrid working is now embedded. Commuter numbers on SWR were already in slow long term decline before Covid (and the guards dispute) despite economic and population growth. Sure, there are isolated sectors and some companies which are trying to force a return to work, but reportedly they're being hit with resignations as people move move to other jobs which offer hybrid working.Unless AI rapidly kills off office work wont general economic and population growth inevitably take commuting back to pre pandemic levels?
“The evidence we have got, and it is hard to measure office attendance directly, is that that growth has decelerated at a faster rate than we had assumed,” he said. “We could be at an equilibrium.”
The areas which need extra capacity are the suburban and Windsor routes. I think the big decline has been on the outer routes to Portsmouth etc. They need a pre Covid timetable brought back as trains are bursting in the AM peak through Wimbledon and Putney etc, With loads of new housing going up around Wandsworth town, the station is getting busier and busierHybrid working is now embedded. Commuter numbers on SWR were already in slow long term decline before Covid (and the guards dispute) despite economic and population growth. Sure, there are isolated sectors and some companies which are trying to force a return to work, but reportedly they're being hit with resignations as people move move to other jobs which offer hybrid working.
TfL is on course to make an unbudgeted loss this year because of passenger growth unexpectedly flatling.
To quote TfL's Chief Finance Officer:
![]()
Has the post-pandemic return to the office stalled?
Passenger numbers only 1% higher than a year agowww.standard.co.uk
So don't expect all the 701s to ever be needed on all the services for which they were originally intended. That ship sailed some years ago.
It's leisure and business travel which are the growth areas now.
I bet SE would love another micro-fleet.If SWR don't need say 20 x 701/5 units, they will surely follow the 707's and reduce the SE tender to replace 455's.
Wont hybrid working reductions to longer distance SWR commuting be counteracted to some extent by an increase due to hybrid working - not having to go in so often makes it more attractive to live further away. Plus the significant residential developments going in around those stations.Hybrid working is now embedded. Commuter numbers on SWR were already in slow long term decline before Covid (and the guards dispute) despite economic and population growth. Sure, there are isolated sectors and some companies which are trying to force a return to work, but reportedly they're being hit with resignations as people move move to other jobs which offer hybrid working.
So around 13% of training doneAccording to a video from BBC London, 100 out of the 750 drivers have been trained so far on the 701s
Given the stock shortage, the first few class 701s will only free up units so that the booked formations actually run. If class 455s are still going to Kilmarnock for repairs, that suggests they will keep going for a while longer. Are any of them getting close to C6 overhaul dates? That will almost certainly be terminal.With 5 units introduced in first five months, 10 in next ~6 months there is a small rate increase. While there are 82 class 455s, roughly need 30-35 10-car class 701s in service to displace those depending on other fleet changes. The next 10 gets a third of the way there, it's likely a further rate increase in the second half of next year and any remaining gap might be coverable by other stock/formation reductions while a few more diagrams await going over to 701s.
Lease is up at the end of 2025. They're not going on any longer than thatthat suggests they will keep going for a while longer.
Which, I take it, is why Mr Drury is pushing for a whole-scale entry into service…Lease is up at the end of 2025. They're not going on any longer than that
Why? It’s not like there is any new user signed up or even in prospect. If they still have mileage left to C4 and time left to C6, there is no reason why leases could not be extende.Lease is up at the end of 2025. They're not going on any longer than that
It will surely have to be extended. No way SWR are in a position to off-lease the 455s then.Lease is up at the end of 2025. They're not going on any longer than that
I guess the same single 458 that was on Reading services all day yesterday.Just the usual suspects out this morning - no new diagrams.
2H08 was not a 701 this morning after all. A 5-car 458 instead.
And the Surbiton peakbuster did not run due to a fault.
458536, according to RTTI guess the same single 458 that was on Reading services all day yesterday.
A fault with the 701?Just the usual suspects out this morning - no new diagrams.
2H08 was not a 701 this morning after all. A 5-car 458 instead.
And the Surbiton peakbuster did not run due to a fault.
yes, according to National Rail's live departures siteA fault with the 701?
2H08 isn’t “booked” a 701 until the dec 15 timetable changeJust the usual suspects out this morning - no new diagrams.
2H08 was not a 701 this morning after all. A 5-car 458 instead.
And the Surbiton peakbuster did not run due to a fault.
Ah, I had misunderstood2H08 isn’t “booked” a 701 until the dec 15 timetable change
So presumably that’s the new diagram?2H08 isn’t “booked” a 701 until the dec 15 timetable change
I believe so, but as mentioned by another member it may be STP’d as a 455 until the diagram can be fully crewedSo presumably that’s the new diagram?
Leases can be extended.Lease is up at the end of 2025. They're not going on any longer than that
As I said previously, the 701s will provide an over 20% capacity increase on the suburban network without a single new service being added. This will also allow longer trains on to the mainline network due to displacing 450s.If we look at passenger recovery and numbers on TfL it's the rail modes that are doing best. Elizabeth line going gangbusters, London Overground already back to 2019 levels and the tube not far off.
Buses some way back and were long in decline. DLR recovered well until problems with new train introduction and constant closures and short forms have hampered the network over the past year (sound familiar?).
That doesn't mean SWR will flatline if they get their act together.