sjoh
Member
I'm not 100% sure of this, but my understanding here is that whilst TfL treat taps on the pink transfer readers as a continuation of journey, NR treats them as a start/end of a new journey for statistical purposes, which could explain these two and similar others. I.e in the raw data provided to NR from TfL, the log indicates it as a transfer onto the TfL system rather than a continuous journey from a non-TfL contact point. Essentially the data validity is a victim of the changes to contactless/oyster payment thresholds in the Zones. If that makes any sense whatsoever? I think I've confused myself here!
Kildonan 240 Elton and Orston 212 Clifton (Manchester) 202 Chapelton (Devon) 186 Coombe Junction Halt 140 Reddish South 128 Polesworth 118 Ince and Elton (Cheshire) 86 Shippea Hill 70 Denton 54
== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==
Overall passenger numbers (2.85bn) are where they were about 10 years ago.
The Elizabeth line is so hugely noticeable on this, as is London & SE.
n
Part of me thinks these numbers are slightly elevated but still it empahsises the passenger number impact on the line / the not as strong passenger recovery elsewhere. As always the ORR calls it "Estimates of station usage"
- Maryland is busier than Birmigham International (I find this especially dubious as apparently Stratford is the main destination/origin pair which is a 10 minute walk away!)
- Ealing Broadway is busier than Marylebone