Anonymous10
Established Member
I'd prefer a reliable service that isn't as frequent to one which is supposed to be hourly but is practically cancelled every time.There goes my hourly service to Lime St!
I'd prefer a reliable service that isn't as frequent to one which is supposed to be hourly but is practically cancelled every time.There goes my hourly service to Lime St!
I'd prefer a reliable service that isn't as frequent to one which is supposed to be hourly but is practically cancelled every time.
Good morning, We are hoping to have an update on the timetable position today. We'll come back to you on this shortly once we have an update.
In my opinion with how the British rail network was developed there'd always be a few troublesome stations, that don't quite allow the 197s to fit their specs. For Ferryside it's platform height apparently, if so surely its better to adapt a handful stations than to have a train impeded because of a few stations.
I have found the platform and barrier staff at Cardiff Central to be quite helpful/accommodating. Maybe it is luck or my demeanour. But I bet they are snowed under with disgruntled passengers at the moment. Get shouted at a few times and most people become rather "defensive" in any future interactions. Get the higher managers on the front line and let them see the reality !.Eighty-nine, good gosh. What with a shocking proportion of Great Western Railway services being cancelled (or truncated at Westbury) this week, it's looking like another dire day for Newport and Cardiff then. Almost all of Cardiff Central's platform and gateline staff are extremely rude too, and don't provide much help to customers looking to travel whose services have been cancelled.
I do hope the problem with wheelflats is because drivers are yet to get familiar with how the 197s behave in conditions of poor adhesion. It is alright having all the performance but if the road conditions are unsuitable it takes delicacy, finesse and possibly forget the time table.In my opinion with how the British rail network was developed there'd always be a few troublesome stations, that don't quite allow the 197s to fit their specs. For Ferryside it's platform height apparently, if so surely its better to adapt a handful stations than to have a train impeded because of a few stations.
Re wheelflats I believe craigybagel has given us a decent insight into what may be causing it namely the power of the unit, the electric throttle (correct me if I'm wrong) and hold over driving tendencies from 15x stock. I would hope for this to settle down next year when staff are more familiar.
One would hope that drivers were taught the appropriate techniques during their traction training, using some suitable location with the rails made artificially slippery?I do hope the problem with wheelflats is because drivers are yet to get familiar with how the 197s behave in conditions of poor adhesion. It is alright having all the performance but if the road conditions are unsuitable it takes delicacy, finesse and possibly forget the time table.
I know what you mean but I doubt any simulation was very thorough. Real hard experience in the field probably takes an unpleasantly long time to build up.One would hope that drivers were taught the appropriate techniques during their traction training, using some suitable location with the rails made artificially slippery?
I’ve just asked TFW on X and their response was:
Re wheelflats I believe craigybagel has given us a decent insight into what may be causing it namely the power of the unit, the electric throttle (correct me if I'm wrong) and hold over driving tendencies from 15x stock. I would hope for this to settle down next year when staff are more familiar.
I do hope the problem with wheelflats is because drivers are yet to get familiar with how the 197s behave in conditions of poor adhesion. It is alright having all the performance but if the road conditions are unsuitable it takes delicacy, finesse and possibly forget the time table.
It not so much that the techniques required for driving in slippy conditions are different on 197s, it's the same basic principals at play on all trains around the world. You can only apply so much power, or so much brake, before the you lose adhesion. To cope with this, you need to use less power to get moving and brake earlier and gentler to stop again.One would hope that drivers were taught the appropriate techniques during their traction training, using some suitable location with the rails made artificially slippery?
And with GWR & Cross Country on strike, TfW would also have to carry their passengers.Looks like around 83 cancellations tomorrow according to TfW journey check, so no improvement on today.
![]()
Train timetables | Transport for Wales
Transport for Wales | Buy Cheap Train Tickets and Check Train Timestfw.wales
If scroll on that link to the Liverpool to Chester route its in there now that it'll be January when it goes hourly
It's not. There's no interpretation to make!No, it's going (back) to hourly from December from what I've interpreted there.
Those dates are in groups. Suggests to my little-knowledge mind that each group is the result of a delivery of wheel-sets/bogies rather than a steady trudge by a wheel lathe ?.Figure you guys might find this interesting, internally a post was made on the company Yammer that described the wheel flat issues the 197s have been facing alongside detailing when each unit is planned to come back into service:
197112 - 08/12/2023
197013 - 09/12/2023
197014 - 14/12/2023
197017 - 19/12/2023
197006 - 21/12/2023
197001 - 23/12/2023
197007 and 012 - 11/01/2024 or earlier if possible
It's provisional slots on the lathe at Crewe ETD. Swapping wheelsets/bogies and sending them elsewhere was considered but would have turned out slower. Its in the same internal piece as the dates!Those dates are in groups. Suggests to my little-knowledge mind that each group is the result of a delivery of wheel-sets/bogies rather than a steady trudge by a wheel lathe ?.
High winds blow leaves off trees + heavy rain -> slippery rails -> trains skidding -> wheel flats.Can anyone explain how the wheel damage was caused by the storms in November?
High winds blow leaves off trees + heavy rain -> slippery rails -> trains skidding -> wheel flats.
It's a rather disingenuous excuse I agree.To me, the implication of saying that trains are out of service due to storm damage is that if the storms had not happened, the trains would not need wheel turning and would still be in service now.
Is that the case? It's not the impression that I got from previous discussions.
The storms caused track conditions in certain places to be awful as masses of wet leaves came down in one go.To me, the implication of saying that trains are out of service due to storm damage is that if the storms had not happened, the trains would not need wheel turning and would still be in service now.
Is that the case? It's not the impression that I got from previous discussions.
The storms caused track conditions in certain places to be awful as masses of wet leaves came down in one go.
The slippery track then caused more slipping and skidding which damaged the wheels more than usually would happen.
There's always a programme of tyre turning but when a huge chunk of the fleet need doing in one go then problems arise as they can't all be done together.
In reality it seems highly likely that the characteristics of 197s did play a part too. Crew unfamiliarity mixed with a light, high powered unit on really poor rail conditions was the worst combination for autumn.So - genuine question - this in fact has nothing to do with the 197s being more suesceptible (at present) to getting wheel flats and we'd be in the same situation if this had happened last year?
Is there not a lathe at Canton?In reality it seems highly likely that the characteristics of 197s did play a part too. Crew unfamiliarity mixed with a light, high powered unit on really poor rail conditions was the worst combination for autumn.
The lathe at Holyhead isn't yet in use so I believe at this point only Crewe ETD had the capability for tyre turning.
The fact that 150/153/158/Mk4s on the same routes haven't suffered anywhere near as much damage as the 197s which does indicate that they do suffer more.
The list above with the out of service units also seems to indicate the 2 cars suffer worse than the 3s. There are a lot more of them but all bar 1 being 2 car units does seem to point to the problem being worse on those.
In reality it seems highly likely that the characteristics of 197s did play a part too. Crew unfamiliarity mixed with a light, high powered unit on really poor rail conditions was the worst combination for autumn.
The lathe at Holyhead isn't yet in use so I believe at this point only Crewe ETD had the capability for tyre turning.