• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Should preserved railways 1940s events go ahead this year?

Status
Not open for further replies.

43096

On Moderation
Joined
23 Nov 2015
Messages
18,889
I think it would be incredibly insensitive to hold such an event when so much suffering is being endured by the poor people of Ukraine. I think it could also be quite unsettling for any children who are present.
Why is it insensitive now in particular? As people keep saying, there are wars around the world almost every year. Is it because Ukraine is "white" so more like "us"?

I doubt Ukrainians are going to take any notice of a few people dressed as the Home Guard from 80 years ago on an English preserved railway - they've got rather more to worry about.
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

John Luxton

Established Member
Joined
23 Nov 2014
Messages
2,041
Location
Liverpool
I wasn’t born until the back end of 1958, but I can relate far more readily to this happy period, rather than dreary, dark and frightening times of WW2.
Strange I was born a year after you.

My lifelong fascination with history was kindled by listening to the wartime lives of my parents, grand parents, aunts and uncles. I found their accounts fascinating.

Probably the first purely history series I recall as a child was "All Our Yesterdays" with Brian Inglis which focussed heavily on the War Years.

I may have been born 14 years after World War II but the 60s and 70s which I lived though as a youngster just do not compare in terms of interest.

== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==

You demonstrate the issue in a nutshell with the above. One of my tutors at university was involved in Napoleonic Wars re-enactment; he made professor before retiring. But what he did - as other re-enactors in other historical periods do - was in itself a form of research, and treated the history extremely seriously. The railway events don't, and that's why I have a real problem with them - as I do with

That's not history, but showbusiness.

I appreciate some reenactors will take their hobby with greater seriousness and seek greater degrees of accuracy than others but providing people get pleasure and satisfaction in what they do does it really matter that much? I think not. Our recreated railways are often similar when it comes to compromises.

How many lines try to pass off BR Mark I rolling stock as pre nationalisation?

Not really much different.

How accurate are our heritage railways for the time period they intend to recreate.
 
Last edited:

stuu

Established Member
Joined
2 Sep 2011
Messages
3,774
You see where does this cancel culture stop?

Whilst they don't have railway connections there appears to be a strong historical re-enactment hobby in the UK with various events around the country off railway premises.

- Let's ban Roman Re-enactments - the Romans kept slaves and invaded other countries including ours!
- Let's ban Norman Battle re-enactments - the Normans invaded England, were brutal and repressive to the native Celts and Saxons.
- Let's ban Civil War re-enactments - as it commemorates the murder of Britain's lawful king and celebrates the establishment of an intolerant republican regime which even banned Christmas.

So where does it all stop?

Then again we have the Murder Mystery Weekends so popular of country hotels and some heritage locations obviously taking their cue from such popular TV shows as Poiroit.

Are we going to ban these in case they offend the families of murder victims - just choosing the year 2019/20 there were 716 homicides in England and Wales that is a large number of people but I don't see support groups for murder victims' families trying to ban these.

Thus the question is where does it all stop?
Which literally no one has ever said. There's enough things to be angry about without having to invent things
 

Peter Sarf

Established Member
Joined
12 Oct 2010
Messages
9,817
Location
Croydon
So in as another thread as mentioned the question, about a 1980’s themed railway I’ll ask how comfortable would you be attending that 1980’s railway with minors and the likes of Jimmy Saville posters promoting ‘This is the age of the train’ and music from the likes of Gary Glitter?
Would you say that this is a good idea? Or as you put it is this just being ‘woke’?
One of the reasons Jimmy Saville and Gary Glitter got away with their behaviour for so long was that no one was prepared to believe victims. That was because many people did not believe such things ever happened so the accusation was beyond comprehension. Nowadays we are much more aware of paedophilia and the risks to children. That did not happen because such things were swept under the carpet.

So YES it is a good idea. If my granddaughter were to look at a poster and ask me who are they, I would have the opportunity to explain to her. Nasty things and nasty people are not avoided by pretending such things do not exist.
 

gc4946

Member
Joined
17 Jul 2019
Messages
368
Location
Leeds
I've never attended railways' 1940s events but my nearest 1940s event I know about takes place annually in Haworth.
However I haven't attended the Haworth event simply because the village gets very overcrowded when that occurs.
This year I guess there could be increased sensitivity about re-enacting the Red Army and other roles of those who fought for the Soviets.
But I suspect many people distinguish what happened during WW2 and what happens now.
 

35B

Established Member
Joined
19 Dec 2011
Messages
5,585
Which is fine - you're quite at liberty not to go. But it's another thing entirely to say these events shouldn't take place.
I don’t say that - though I wish they’d never been invented.
 

nanstallon

Member
Joined
18 Dec 2015
Messages
1,063
I don't disagree with the general points you've made, but I have to disagree with the one in bold. Following WW2, the Yalta conference divided continental Europe into spheres of influence of the victorious countries: USA, USSR, and Britain. Ukraine was included in the Eastern bloc, and became effectively a satellite state of Russia, which was the dominant state in the East.

Russia's loss of its dominance over Eastern Europe in the 1990s is what so offends Putin, who seems to be on a mission to re-establish an Iron Curtain with Russia in control of everything behind it. So current events are at least in part a consequence of Yalta and the second World War.

Back on topic, I don't think that requires cancellations of re-enactments here; though personally I think we should move on from endlessly harking back to that time, and therefore they aren't events I choose to visit.

Ukraine was not even a satellite state of Russia; it was part of the Soviet Union, just as Russia was. After Russia, Ukraine was probably the most important component of the USSR. But Ukraine has its own history and identity; Stalin deliberately caused a famine in Ukraine in the 1930s, and there is little love lost between the two countries. Even less now.
 

bishdunster

Member
Joined
9 Oct 2012
Messages
325
Location
Dunster
I think it would be incredibly insensitive to hold such an event when so much suffering is being endured by the poor people of Ukraine. I think it could also be quite unsettling for any children who are present.

I also feel the format of ‘War on the Line’ is now very tired and tedious, and it can only be ‘nostalgic’ for people over 85 too.

A late-fifties/early sixties event would not only be more appropriate at the moment, but also much more enjoyable! Why ‘celebrate’ one of the most awful times in human history, when we could enjoy recreating the much brighter period of ’never having it so good’?

Beat music, coffee bars, 1950s fashions, the Marilyn Munro look and teddy boys, classic cars, dansette record players, juke boxes, Happy Days, scooters, mods and rockers, classic busses, and, last but not least, authentic BR liveried locos and MK1 rolling stock!

I wasn’t born until the back end of 1958, but I can relate far more readily to this happy period, rather than dreary, dark and frightening times of WW2.
Oh yes, complete with Teddy Boys with their flick knives, pitched battles on seaside railways between mods and motorcycle chain weilding rockers and everyone smoking Woodbines of course !;)
 
Last edited:

43066

Veteran Member
Joined
24 Nov 2019
Messages
12,089
Location
London
With the current state of affairs in Ukraine, should preserved lines go ahead with the 1940s events?

To me it's a double edged sword. On the one hand it might be seen as insensitive to Ukraine to go ahead with the events

On the other hand 1940s events are some of the biggest and most popular events at preserved railways and a key source of income.

I wonder what other forum contributers think about the situation?

These events don’t appeal to me particularly, but cancelling them strikes me as ridiculous, virtue signalling nonsense, especially when it is remembered that preserved railways are charitable enterprises and should be doing everything they reasonably can to raise money to further their cause as such. The 1940s events aren’t about glorifying war at all, rather they tend to be about recreating the experience of the “home front”.

Let’s be honest actual veterans (not many of them left now) have attended these over the decades, despite themselves actually having lived through the horrors of war, so why on Earth a load of younger people apparently feel upset or offended by this kind of thing boggles the mind.

There has been a war going on somewhere for the entire history of humanity, so one can only speculate as to why the Ukraine situation in particular is suddenly so prominent in peoples’ minds. People claiming to be offended on behalf of others over this should consider why they apparently didn’t feel the same way during the recent conflicts in the Middle East, for example.

The likes of Goering or the SS weren't to be joked about, but were a deadly threat to those living under their rule (even in Germany) - the idea of a recreation of such rule as a jolly day out is ghastly beyond belief

Has there ever been a single 1940s heritage railway event where Goering and the SS (I think you mean Himmler and the SS?) were “joked about”? They’re one aspect of WW2 and of scant relevance to recreating (however loosely) the U.K. home front.
 

Peter Sarf

Established Member
Joined
12 Oct 2010
Messages
9,817
Location
Croydon
These events don’t appeal to me particularly, but cancelling them strikes me as ridiculous, virtue signalling nonsense, especially when it is remembered that preserved railways are charitable enterprises and should be doing everything they reasonably can to raise money to further their cause as such. The 1940s events aren’t about glorifying war at all, rather they tend to be about recreating the experience of the “home front”.

Let’s be honest actual veterans (not many of them left now) have attended these over the decades, so why on Earth a load of younger people apparently feel upset or offended by this kind of thing boggles the mind.

There has been a war going on somewhere for the entire history of humanity, so one can only speculate as to why the Ukraine situation in particular is suddenly so prominent in peoples’ minds. People claiming to be offended on behalf of others over this should consider why they apparently didn’t feel the same way during the recent conflicts in the Middle East, for example.



Has there ever been a single 1940s heritage railway event where Goering and the SS (did you mean Himmler and the SS?) were “joked about”? They’re one aspect of WW2 and of scant relevance to recreating (however loosely) the U.K. home front.
It seems to me that some people want to sweep the past under the carpet in the belief that it will then never happen again. We need to remember the past so as to be able to learn the lessons.

I am not sure how accurate an individual re-enactment is but it still provokes thought and questions.

To think - that if Russia/Nazis had their way then this kind of debate would be suppressed !.
 

yorkie

Forum Staff
Staff Member
Administrator
Joined
6 Jun 2005
Messages
78,543
Location
Yorkshire
I don't think anyone should be attempting to ban such events or claim it is wrong for them to take place, but - and this is the crucial thing - if those who would be taking part do not feel comfortable with it and would prefer to cancel, then people should respect their decision.
 

Peter Sarf

Established Member
Joined
12 Oct 2010
Messages
9,817
Location
Croydon
I don't think anyone should be attempting to ban such events or claim it is wrong for them to take place, but - and this is the crucial thing - if those who would be taking part do not feel comfortable with it and would prefer to cancel, then people should respect their decision.
Fair point.
 

Trainfan344

Established Member
Joined
13 Oct 2012
Messages
2,305
This topic was sparked by a few comments I saw on social media and thought it was am interesting debate to be had.

I'm not saying we should cancel history but I think it's an interesting point to step back and just think is this the right thing to do at the moment?
 

LSWR Cavalier

Established Member
Joined
23 Aug 2020
Messages
1,565
Location
Leafy Suburbia
People can vote with their feet by attending events or boycotting them as they think appropriate.

I should love to attend an Elvis railway event with replica musicians, surely there are other possible themes that have not been used much.
 

reddragon

Established Member
Joined
24 Mar 2016
Messages
3,275
Location
Churn (closed)
I don't think anyone should be attempting to ban such events or claim it is wrong for them to take place, but - and this is the crucial thing - if those who would be taking part do not feel comfortable with it and would prefer to cancel, then people should respect their decision.
We also need to remember that the railway is very short of volunteers post covid for various reasons and running the event was already on a knife edge, so any risk of volunteer drop out could not be risked.
 

43096

On Moderation
Joined
23 Nov 2015
Messages
18,889
This topic was sparked by a few comments I saw on social media and thought it was am interesting debate to be had.

I'm not saying we should cancel history but I think it's an interesting point to step back and just think is this the right thing to do at the moment?
Which takes us back to the question of why at the moment? To repeat: there's always been wars going on, so why now - is it because Ukrainians are white and like us?
 

AlterEgo

Verified Rep - Wingin' It! Paul Lucas
Joined
30 Dec 2008
Messages
29,680
Location
LBK
People can vote with their feet by attending events or boycotting them as they think appropriate.
They can, but there has to be an event to run, and there isn’t in this case because the people organising it didn’t feel it struck the right tone with recent events. People are getting all het up about a single event being cancelled because the people who created it no longer thought it was appropriate. They cancelled it - nobody else did.
 

D6968

Member
Joined
30 Sep 2021
Messages
433
This topic was sparked by a few comments I saw on social media and thought it was am interesting debate to be had.

I'm not saying we should cancel history but I think it's an interesting point to step back and just think is this the right thing to do at the moment?
Seconded.
 

Bertie the bus

Established Member
Joined
15 Aug 2014
Messages
3,216
Why is it insensitive now in particular? As people keep saying, there are wars around the world almost every year. Is it because Ukraine is "white" so more like "us"?
I think you are trying to make it a race issue when it isn’t. I was the first on this thread to ask why it should be considered insensitive now when past events have taken place when there have been wars going on, but I don’t think it is due to race. I think it is due to the blanket media coverage of this conflict. As the last 2 years have highlighted, though it was common before that, many people think what the media tells them to think. If the war in Yemen isn’t covered by the media then it isn’t important. The war in Ukraine is getting huge coverage therefore it is important.
 

XAM2175

Established Member
Joined
8 Jun 2016
Messages
3,471
Location
Glasgow
It seems to me that some people want to sweep the past under the carpet in the belief that it will then never happen again. We need to remember the past so as to be able to learn the lessons.

I am not sure how accurate an individual re-enactment is but it still provokes thought and questions.
I said it earlier and I'll say it again: organisers cancelling an event because they feel that the timing is no longer appropriate is nowhere near to "[sweeping] the past under the carpet".

They can, but there has to be an event to run, and there isn’t in this case because the people organising it didn’t feel it struck the right tone with recent events. People are getting all het up about a single event being cancelled because the people who created it no longer thought it was appropriate. They cancelled it - nobody else did.
Exactly this.
 

Trainfan344

Established Member
Joined
13 Oct 2012
Messages
2,305
It's not a case of thinking what the media tells us. This is getting huge coverage, BECAUSE IT'S A HUGE EVENT! Russia has launched a full scale invasion of Ukraine. For once I wish people would look past race, something a lot of posters on here fail to do.

For those of you struggling to understand why this war is different I've found this article from the New York Times which I feel explains it.


For those who can't access or don't wish to read the full article, I've included a few quotes below.

There have been dozens of wars in the almost 80 years since World War II ended. But if Russia invades Ukraine in the coming days, it will be different from almost all of them. It will be another sign that the world may be entering an alarming new era in which authoritarianism is on the rise. A Russian invasion of Ukraine seems likely to involve one of the world’s largest militaries launching an unprovoked ground invasion of a neighboring country. The world’s most powerful countries have rarely used force to expand their boundaries

This is why this is different and maybe it's not the right time for 1940s events celebrating World War 2.
 

stuu

Established Member
Joined
2 Sep 2011
Messages
3,774
This is why this is different and maybe it's not the right time for 1940s events celebrating World War 2.
Absolutely. Also there is a greater than zero chance that British forces will end up involved, whilst obviously they fought and died in Iraq and Afghanistan, a European land war is an entirely different matter
 

Bertie the bus

Established Member
Joined
15 Aug 2014
Messages
3,216
It's not a case of thinking what the media tells us. This is getting huge coverage, BECAUSE IT'S A HUGE EVENT! Russia has launched a full scale invasion of Ukraine. For once I wish people would look past race, something a lot of posters on here fail to do.

For those of you struggling to understand why this war is different I've found this article from the New York Times which I feel explains it.
Which sort of proves my point. An article in the media says something therefore it is true. Although I think you will find it says different to almost all other wars, not all of them. Regardless, the level of threat to world stability has literally nothing to do with whether holding a 19040s weekend is more or less insensitive during this war than any other.
 

Peter Sarf

Established Member
Joined
12 Oct 2010
Messages
9,817
Location
Croydon
Which takes us back to the question of why at the moment? To repeat: there's always been wars going on, so why now - is it because Ukrainians are white and like us?
No it is because a major military power is embarking on an unprovoked attack on a neighbouring country quite clearly in an endeavour to absorb that country. For a parallel we have to look back to the Nazi invasion of Poland and where that lead us (World War Two). Whether that means the WW2 enactment should be frowned upon is then another argument.
I said it earlier and I'll say it again: organisers cancelling an event because they feel that the timing is no longer appropriate is nowhere near to "[sweeping] the past under the carpet".


Exactly this.
I did not mean I was criticising the organisers for cancelling. I was pointing out, to those who think it should be cancelled, that history should not be swept under the carpet.
It's not a case of thinking what the media tells us. This is getting huge coverage, BECAUSE IT'S A HUGE EVENT! Russia has launched a full scale invasion of Ukraine. For once I wish people would look past race, something a lot of posters on here fail to do.

For those of you struggling to understand why this war is different I've found this article from the New York Times which I feel explains it.


For those who can't access or don't wish to read the full article, I've included a few quotes below.



This is why this is different and maybe it's not the right time for 1940s events celebrating World War 2.
That is a good find to explain why the Ukraine conflict is different.
 

Trainfan344

Established Member
Joined
13 Oct 2012
Messages
2,305
Which sort of proves my point. An article in the media says something therefore it is true. Although I think you will find it says different to almost all other wars, not all of them. Regardless, the level of threat to world stability has literally nothing to do with whether holding a 19040s weekend is more or less insensitive during this war than any other.

I'm confused. Where would you like to get the facts from? Would you like to go to Ukraine and verify it for yourself? Our information comes from the media because that's what the media is for.
 

Royston Vasey

Established Member
Joined
14 May 2008
Messages
3,001
Location
Cambridge
The War is so long ago, I heard all about it at school, heritage railways have been remembering it for decades.

Perhaps the many difficult years of food rationing that followed it could be recreated, with suitable limited menus in the buffet cars. Something a bit different, perhaps even with early diesels?
Oh, modern day LNER are recreating that perfectly well.
 

Bertie the bus

Established Member
Joined
15 Aug 2014
Messages
3,216
I'm confused. Where would you like to get the facts from? Would you like to go to Ukraine and verify it for yourself? Our information comes from the media because that's what the media is for.
What you posted wasn't fact. It was opinion. The war hadn't even started when that article was published.

I see you have decided to disregard my question about how the threat to world stability of any particular war affects the insensitivity of holding a 1940s weekend while the conflict is ongoing which seemed to be your point. If a war only has a fairly limited regional impact does that reduce the impact of getting shot or bombed?
 

35B

Established Member
Joined
19 Dec 2011
Messages
5,585
These events don’t appeal to me particularly, but cancelling them strikes me as ridiculous, virtue signalling nonsense, especially when it is remembered that preserved railways are charitable enterprises and should be doing everything they reasonably can to raise money to further their cause as such. The 1940s events aren’t about glorifying war at all, rather they tend to be about recreating the experience of the “home front”.

Let’s be honest actual veterans (not many of them left now) have attended these over the decades, despite themselves actually having lived through the horrors of war, so why on Earth a load of younger people apparently feel upset or offended by this kind of thing boggles the mind.

There has been a war going on somewhere for the entire history of humanity, so one can only speculate as to why the Ukraine situation in particular is suddenly so prominent in peoples’ minds. People claiming to be offended on behalf of others over this should consider why they apparently didn’t feel the same way during the recent conflicts in the Middle East, for example.



Has there ever been a single 1940s heritage railway event where Goering and the SS (I think you mean Himmler and the SS?) were “joked about”? They’re one aspect of WW2 and of scant relevance to recreating (however loosely) the U.K. home front.
I meant Goering, in context, and yes, there have been those events reported. Indeed, any event that includes an element in which part of the railway is portrayed as in occupied Europe fails a morality test.
I don't think anyone should be attempting to ban such events or claim it is wrong for them to take place, but - and this is the crucial thing - if those who would be taking part do not feel comfortable with it and would prefer to cancel, then people should respect their decision.
I completely agree.
 

John Luxton

Established Member
Joined
23 Nov 2014
Messages
2,041
Location
Liverpool
I meant Goering, in context, and yes, there have been those events reported. Indeed, any event that includes an element in which part of the railway is portrayed as in occupied Europe fails a morality test.

I completely agree.

You might question the appearance of the likes of "Goering" at events - but there are some people who follow "alternative" or "What if History".

Until it became in the latter series excessively bogged down with the SciFi timetravel - parallel universe Amazon's "Man in the High Castle" was an interesting drama depicting what could have happened if the Axis nations had won World War II.

Given that the Germans came close enough to occupy the Channel Islands - it was more good fortune than anything else that they didn't make it onto mainland soil.

Thus personally, as someone who is interested in history, I would have no problem with a re-enactment of scenes that could have happened here - but thank God didn't.

I wouldn't be offended by such things and would see them as instructive to future generations as to why totalitarian regimes are bad.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top