• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

GTR cancellations including not operating from Victoria until 10th Jan

Status
Not open for further replies.

Horizon22

Established Member
Associate Staff
Jobs & Careers
Joined
8 Sep 2019
Messages
11,025
Location
London
And that is why you have the timetable as outlined, lack of resource within these teams to reliably deliver anything else.

Yep. It's a shame as the possibility is certainly there to do something extra if someone had the time to spend a night shift planning some VSTP diagrams and the crews. Passengers will of course lose out significantly as a result.
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

Bald Rick

Veteran Member
Joined
28 Sep 2010
Messages
35,941
The lack of resource may not only be crew.

A TOC also needs people to replan a service, rewrite diagrams, etc. If you are short of those people, then you take the easiest route which is to ‘copy and paste’ the reduced Service already running.
 

Timmyd

Member
Joined
28 Jun 2014
Messages
239
The question that I am yet to hear a satisfactory response to is this:

Why is it that every single time Southern have a staffing crisis, the Caterham/Tattenham Corner branches are the first to be hacked back? On the CAT branch, we automatically lose our semi-fast services, in favour of retaining the stoppers, despite the fact that the vast majority of the Zone 1-5 stations have a direct bus service to Central London, or duplication of services by either London Overground or the Victoria-London Bridge services?

The Zone 1-5 stations and the Brighton Mainline seem to be the priority for Southern, and stuff the branches. Even the EGR line seems to get an unfair share of hits, despite the fact that the Uckfield services could be adjusted to serve more stations.......
Because they’re always empty. I frequently have reason to use Whyteleafe South off peak and its rare i don’t have a whole coach to myself all the way to ECR. When stations like Forest Hill are losing their whole Southern service (and the Overground from those stations is already very busy all day and especially at peaks), and you have fast connections at East Croydon to London Bridge still, you really have nothing to complain about. Stations like Anerley don’t have direct buses to Central London (in fact no stations in the Croydon area do any more) and from Sydenham it would take well over an hour on the 176, so not a realistic alternative

On the broader question, one thing which will need to be taken into account is schools traffic. Significant numbers of children travel relatively long distances from Clapham Junction to schools in and beyond Croydon (the East Grinstead line particularly) and thats a journey which would be impossible by bus at that time of day.
 

Horizon22

Established Member
Associate Staff
Jobs & Careers
Joined
8 Sep 2019
Messages
11,025
Location
London
The lack of resource may not only be crew.

A TOC also needs people to replan a service, rewrite diagrams, etc. If you are short of those people, then you take the easiest route which is to ‘copy and paste’ the reduced Service already running.

No indeed. I suppose for me the "easiest" route is not necessarily the "only" route and has the most substantial impact on passengers and its trying to balance those requirements.
 

Bald Rick

Veteran Member
Joined
28 Sep 2010
Messages
35,941
No indeed. I suppose for me the "easiest" route is not necessarily the "only" route and has the most substantial impact on passengers and its trying to balance those requirements.

yes, perhaps I should have said ‘one way’ rather than ‘easiest’. There are of course easier ways to deal with it from a planning perspective, that are far less passenger friendly.
y
 

louis97

Established Member
Joined
14 May 2008
Messages
2,154
Location
Derby
I am not sure the decision was taken 1-2 weeks ago. Perhaps the options were being discussed, but the decision wasn't made
The wider train planning team were told on the 20th December about the need for a reduced timetable from 4th January. With annual leave and bank holidays, this leaves very little time to do any replanning of the service. Rolling forward the Victoria closure plan was mentioned, and really was the only option with the resource and time available.

From 10th January there will be a reduced timetable until sometime in February. Although if I'm honest this could be longer dependent on the Covid situation.
 

Horizon22

Established Member
Associate Staff
Jobs & Careers
Joined
8 Sep 2019
Messages
11,025
Location
London
yes, perhaps I should have said ‘one way’ rather than ‘easiest’. There are of course easier ways to deal with it from a planning perspective, that are far less passenger friendly.
y

Hmm, I'm not sure there's that many options less passenger-friendly that cancelling trains at two of the major stations for a week!
 

Rob Gibson

Member
Joined
5 Nov 2021
Messages
35
Location
Worthing
Hmm, I'm not sure there's that many options less passenger-friendly that cancelling trains at two of the major stations for a week!
Don’t many commuters take a full two weeks off for Christmas and New Year especially as Monday is a Bank Holiday? Very doubtful East Croydon can handle shuttles without getting in a big mess, anyway can simply undivert the 6 long distance tph that are running to London Bridge.
 

JonathanH

Veteran Member
Joined
29 May 2011
Messages
23,389
Very doubtful East Croydon can handle shuttles without getting in a big mess
It is fairly easy to reverse trains from Victoria in platform 2 and use platforms 1 and 3 for the through services.

anyway can simply undivert the 6 long distance tph that are running to London Bridge.
I think the implication of the discussion in this thread is that that is not simple.
 

HamworthyGoods

Established Member
Joined
15 Jan 2019
Messages
4,485
anyway can simply undivert the 6 long distance tph that are running to London Bridge.

If only planning trains was that simple…

The traincrew working one of those long distance services into London Bridge may well be booked a break on arrival then after that break work a local stopping service from London Bridge.

The reason this is being done is Control is short staffed due to sickness and doesn’t have the ability to unpick/improvise plans.
 

Nicholas Lewis

Established Member
Joined
9 Aug 2019
Messages
8,041
Location
Surrey
From 10th January there will be a reduced timetable until sometime in February. Although if I'm honest this could be longer dependent on the Covid situation.
Undoubtedly and wouldn't be surprised to see this as a precursor to more permanent reductions in services even when resourcing issues have gone away as DofT budget is going to holed below the waterline now with substantial drop off in income again so they will want to minimise costs where they can.
 

Goldfish62

Veteran Member
Joined
14 Feb 2010
Messages
13,220
Undoubtedly and wouldn't be surprised to see this as a precursor to more permanent reductions in services even when resourcing issues have gone away as DofT budget is going to holed below the waterline now with substantial drop off in income again so they will want to minimise costs where they can.
Indeed. I would find it strange if SWR were the only England TOC subject to permanent timetable reductions and I'm a little surprised at the apparent eagerness of some of them to return to pre-Covid service levels when it seems inevitable that reverse gear will have to applied sooner rather than later.
 

Deepgreen

Established Member
Joined
12 Jun 2013
Messages
7,487
Location
Gomshall, Surrey
This saga does reinforce my view that today's railway is very fragile regarding service re-arrangement. It is now far too common to see buses put on to replace trains when anything goes wrong and even planned well in advance because it's now just too hard to re-arrange the railway even where physical route options exist. I'm NOT saying that this is necessarily the case here, as clearly C19 poses problems not previously experienced in modern times. However, I really would have thought an East Croydon to Victoria 12-car regular shuttle service SHOULD be possible and achievable even with severe staff absences on an otherwise virtually empty four-track railway, and is only thwarted by the vast complexity of staffing that has built up, particularly as a result of privatisation.

On the other hand, I fully expect to see severe semi-permanent cuts to the railway as a whole, forcing huge numbers of people into cars and direcrly contradicting Johnson's promnise of a green recovery from C19.

== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==

Passengers also do need to accept travelling in a pandemic is not trouble free and can be fraught with difficulties.
Quite, but I can see an exodus from the railway being a very realisitic possibility as services are slashed and not re-instated, especially as this government continues to favour roads and airlines in its budgets and strategies, despite trying to pass itself off as a 'green' one.
 
Last edited:

andystock22

Member
Joined
27 Dec 2013
Messages
124
Looking at the timetables on the Thameslink website they plan to operate 8 Thameslink trains per hour through the central core (St Pancras to London Bridge. 4 from Bedford, 2 from Cambridge and 2 from Peterborough). Plus 2 per hour from St Pancras to Blackfriars.

Considering most of these services will be 12 cars, should be enough when the Northern Line is closed South of Moorgate, bases on current passenger demand.
 

Nicholas Lewis

Established Member
Joined
9 Aug 2019
Messages
8,041
Location
Surrey
This saga does reinforce my view that today's railway is very fragile regarding service re-arrangement. It is now far too common to see buses put on to replace trains when anything goes wrong and even planned well in advance because it's now just too hard to re-arrange the railway even where physical route options exist. I'm NOT saying that this is necessarily the case here, as clearly C19 poses problems not previously experienced in modern times. However, I really would have thought an East Croydon to Victoria 12-car regular shuttle service SHOULD be possible and achievable even with severe staff absences on an otherwise virtually empty four-track railway, and is only thwarted by the vast complexity of staffing that has built up, particularly as a result of privatisation.
If this was a crisis that came out of nowhere in real time the brilliant control staff would work miracles with the willing support of train crew to run a shuttle but if it needs planning operators have to submit bids, timings have to be validated etc etc and all this takes a lot of resources and time all because one party is worried about incurring sch8 penalties. The railway doesn't need all these contracts and processes anymore it just needs to let staff get back to running trains for its passengers.
 

Horizon22

Established Member
Associate Staff
Jobs & Careers
Joined
8 Sep 2019
Messages
11,025
Location
London
If this was a crisis that came out of nowhere in real time the brilliant control staff would work miracles with the willing support of train crew to run a shuttle but if it needs planning operators have to submit bids, timings have to be validated etc etc and all this takes a lot of resources and time all because one party is worried about incurring sch8 penalties. The railway doesn't need all these contracts and processes anymore it just needs to let staff get back to running trains for its passengers.

The base timetable already exists. Yes bids might need to be submitted, but there are more than enough trains East Croydon to Victoria & vice versa that you can run trains in already existing paths.

I appreciate that trying to rework the service entirely without an emergency plan & severely reduced resources (on crew and planning sides) may be difficult and have certainly experienced this myself over the past 18 months, but a shuttle should be the minimum attempt.
 

physics34

Established Member
Joined
1 Dec 2013
Messages
4,094
One of the points is that there will be dozens of spare drivers available who sign vic to croydon, just not enough to run a full TT. Its clear that there is a shortage of staff elsewhere along the operations ladder aswell.
 

Ian1971

Member
Joined
22 Aug 2019
Messages
38
Location
Croydon
Passengers also do need to accept travelling in a pandemic is not trouble free and can be fraught with difficulties.
What about passengers who have travel like medical staff who can’t work from home or students who need to attend their colleges because their college isn’t offering home learning

I fully understand that their are significant staffing issues but the total removal of services to one of London’s main termini is very extreme.

This is one of the reasons their should have been some restrictions as soon as Omicron was found to protect those working in the public sector so that services could be continued
 

JonathanH

Veteran Member
Joined
29 May 2011
Messages
23,389
the total removal of services to one of London’s main termini is very extreme
It isn't that extreme because there are other network options for people to make almost any journey on the route being served. Circulating via London Bridge / Waterloo adds about 20 minutes.
 

Ian1971

Member
Joined
22 Aug 2019
Messages
38
Location
Croydon
It isn't that extreme because there are other network options for people to make almost any journey on the route being served. Circulating via London Bridge / Waterloo adds about 20 minutes.
No it doesn’t, if you are say trying to travel from East Croydon to Kingston, instead of travelling 10 minutes to Clapham and then changing for a 20 minute journey to Kingston a total of say 40 mins top if you have a 10 minute connection

You now have a 40 minute journey to Waterloo East changing at London Bridge and then 29 minute journey to Kingston factor in 10 minutes changing. It makes a 1 hour & 20 minutes journey double the length
 

zwk500

Veteran Member
Joined
20 Jan 2020
Messages
18,631
Location
Northampton
No it doesn’t, if you are say trying to travel from East Croydon to Kingston, instead of travelling 10 minutes to Clapham and then changing for a 20 minute journey to Kingston a total of say 40 mins top if you have a 10 minute connection

You now have a 40 minute journey to Waterloo East changing at London Bridge and then 29 minute journey to Kingston factor in 10 minutes changing. It makes a 1 hour & 20 minutes journey double the length
For that journey, the train to Wimbledon and Tram to Croydon takes less than an hour. Not great, but certainly not the end of the world.
 

Surreytraveller

On Moderation
Joined
21 Oct 2009
Messages
3,905
What about passengers who have travel like medical staff who can’t work from home or students who need to attend their colleges because their college isn’t offering home learning

I fully understand that their are significant staffing issues but the total removal of services to one of London’s main termini is very extreme.

This is one of the reasons their should have been some restrictions as soon as Omicron was found to protect those working in the public sector so that services could be continued
What would you suggest Southern does?
 

30907

Veteran Member
Joined
30 Sep 2012
Messages
21,981
Location
Airedale
However, I really would have thought an East Croydon to Victoria 12-car regular shuttle service SHOULD be possible and achievable even with severe staff absences on an otherwise virtually empty four-track railway, and is only thwarted by the vast complexity of staffing that has built up, particularly as a result of privatisation.
I agree - given time to arrange something relatively simple, and sufficient traincrew etc. There is only one TOC involved, though, so I'm not sure where your last point fits.
 

Dave91131

Member
Joined
13 Jun 2018
Messages
671
What about passengers who have travel like medical staff who can’t work from home or students who need to attend their colleges because their college isn’t offering home learning

I fully understand that their are significant staffing issues but the total removal of services to one of London’s main termini is very extreme.

This is one of the reasons their should have been some restrictions as soon as Omicron was found to protect those working in the public sector so that services could be continued

I agree that the total removal of all Southern services between East Croydon and London Victoria is far from ideal to put it very mildly, irrespective of how simple or difficult providing even a basic shuttle between them (also serving Clapham Junction) would be.

But regarding restrictions as soon as Omicron was discovered, I highly doubt that the introduction of any measures at that time would have seen us in any better position than we are now - just look at the measures already brought in and the further advice and guidance given, and the case numbers are still rocketing north.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top