jingsmonty
Member
Can we keep on topic please? LNER doors and 385s are not the topic here.
Fair enough - it's funny how we've all gone off at a tangent from a discussion about Scotrail HSTs using short platforms on the Aberdeen to Inverness line
Can we keep on topic please? LNER doors and 385s are not the topic here.
That's the form of SDO that the classic sets could use. Full SDO allows (in theory at least) any subset of the doors to be open. So on a train at a short platform you could open all but the front and rearmost doors.It's not something I've any experience with, but basically, I think it allows doors to be opened from the active panel to all doors to the rear, or the active panel to all doors to the front.
Cheers for that.SDO = Selective Door Opening. Basically, allows some carriage doors to be opened, but not all (for short platforms). It's not something I've any experience with, but basically, I think it allows doors to be opened from the active panel to all doors to the rear, or the active panel to all doors to the front.
Scotrail use 'One Door Operation' for short platforms instead - basically, the Conductor will open their 'Local Door' and that's it. There's definetly less scope for incidents, although it's only really suitable for stations with small traffic levels (Dalwhinnie springs to mind). It's used at Beauly, Conon Bridge, Attadale & Duncraig (request only for both). Possibly some on the West Highland Line too, I think?
Perhaps as Roger Ford said in the latest Modern Railways perhaps new and rebuilt trains are like shaking Ketchup bottles. Only a few drops at first then a huge flood.2 were done last year and just 3 so far this year (in 6 months) so I'd be surprised if we get into double figures....
I do think that Scotrail have missed a trick by not including it in the refurb specification.
I certainly think they have. While it's not the only practical thing preventing longer sets running, it's certainly a main one.
No. The 170s also have SDO but Scotrail don't permit its use
Changing the subject, ScotRail 'liked' a tweet yesterday from someone who sits in his seat with a stopwatch. Carrbridge to Slochd loop in just under 6 minutes in an HST, almost 11 in a 170.
I don't think it will slow things down to much. As was discussed up-thread, nine carriage HST is faster to 100mph than a 170.Yes these sets are 'entertaining ' kinda dreading the fifth coach.
Changing the subject, ScotRail 'liked' a tweet yesterday from someone who sits in his seat with a stopwatch. Carrbridge to Slochd loop in just under 6 minutes in an HST, almost 11 in a 170.
Yes these sets are 'entertaining ' kinda dreading the fifth coach.
I don't think it will slow things down to much. As was discussed up-thread, nine carriage HST is faster to 100mph than a 170.
Perhaps as Roger Ford said in the latest Modern Railways perhaps new and rebuilt trains are like shaking Ketchup bottles. Only a few drops at first then a huge flood.
K
Sorry a typo on my part - the first sentence should've read as "I certainly think they should have", in relation to equipping the refurbished HSTs with such a system.
Which I think highlights the ability the HSTs have to cut journey times, even with the current 100mph blanket.
I doubt it will have a significant effect tbh. I think 100mph will still be attainable in less than 3 minutes I reckon.
Indeed they are, potentially 15 seconds quicker on the data I have.
Possibly, but One Door Operation has less potential for mishaps & would be sufficient for the short platforms that exist. I wouldn't think there's many left that couldn't take a 5+2/6+2 set now
Having driven HSTs on the HML, I'd fully concur with this - the 100mph is easily attainable on the stretch from Kincraig down towards Kingussie (in both directions). About 97mph (Southbound) & just under 90mph (Northbound) is about the best I've managed in a 170 - that's a good 'un too!
I believe that was the chap behind Realtimetrains, collecting data to improve the website.Changing the subject, ScotRail 'liked' a tweet yesterday from someone who sits in his seat with a stopwatch. Carrbridge to Slochd loop in just under 6 minutes in an HST, almost 11 in a 170.
I think they are using GPS too. They have been appealing for GPS data from regular users of rail services that record their journeys.I believe that was the chap behind Realtimetrains, collecting data to improve the website.
46 minutes lost between Haymarket Depot and Haymarket - that's got to be a record!The next powercar move to Brush Loughborough only made it as far as Waverley before giving up.
and also travelling backwards. I think what you're seeing there is the return trip back to the depot. It was only 2 mins late at Edinburgh, then departed 23 mins late, presumably in the other direction.46 minutes lost between Haymarket Depot and Haymarket - that's got to be a record!
43136/43179 wheelset issue...The next powercar move to Brush Loughborough only made it as far as Waverley before giving up. http://www.realtimetrains.co.uk/train/R01894/2019/07/01/advanced
No idea which 43s were involved.
To quote Mitchell & Webb's Snooker Commentator sketch, "Oh and that's a bad miss"!43136/43179 wheelset issue...
No .Wheelflats, perhaps?
No .
3 HST sets sat in sidings at Inverness all day. 1527 Huntly onto a 170 vice HST.