• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Thameslink/ Class 700 Progress

Status
Not open for further replies.
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

gsnedders

Established Member
Joined
6 Sep 2015
Messages
1,472
Those who know the layout and have followed the Thameslink project will understand. Pushing services through the core just doesn't make sense. Force people to terminate at Blackfriars and change trains. Ignore the protests and prevent a bottleneck before it happens.

I think more trains across the river is a good thing, but I totally agree that pushing more, longer distance services through the core seems doomed to fail currently: IMO, there's only two solutions: have a self-contained core section with cross-platform interchanges at the extremities (essentially turning it into a heavy rail metro system), or to build a second pair of lines across the Thames (which is never going to happen on cost grounds). :(

How many other railways in the world manage 24tph? RER A is something like 30tph during the peaks, but I can't think of many others… That's all manually driven, albeit with quasi-moving block signalling IIRC. At the same time, that doesn't have trains coming from remotely as far out as the Thameslink does… I remember some talk about GoA 2 ATO for it, but I don't know/believe that's happened yet?
 

bramling

Veteran Member
Joined
5 Mar 2012
Messages
20,306
Location
Hertfordshire / Teesdale
I think more trains across the river is a good thing, but I totally agree that pushing more, longer distance services through the core seems doomed to fail currently: IMO, there's only two solutions: have a self-contained core section with cross-platform interchanges at the extremities (essentially turning it into a heavy rail metro system), or to build a second pair of lines across the Thames (which is never going to happen on cost grounds). :(

How many other railways in the world manage 24tph? RER A is something like 30tph during the peaks, but I can't think of many others… That's all manually driven, albeit with quasi-moving block signalling IIRC. At the same time, that doesn't have trains coming from remotely as far out as the Thameslink does… I remember some talk about GoA 2 ATO for it, but I don't know/believe that's happened yet?

It's not just the core that is unrealistic, but other parts of the proposed Thameslink network. For example, 6tph between Hitchin and Cambridge, with three different stopping patterns taking roughly 22, 30 or 40 minutes to clear the section all on one pair of tracks with virtually zero overtaking opportunity. Trains from the south will be emanating from as far away as Brighton, whilst to the north there are two single-track sections north of Ely. Anyone with half a brain can tell a mile off that this is not resilient. "It will work" just doesn't wash.

There are plenty of other places too- Hitchin, the Welwyn bottleneck, the slow lines between Welwyn and Potters Bar, the Alexandra Palace-Finsbury Park area, etc etc etc.
 
Last edited:

Sunset route

Established Member
Joined
27 Oct 2015
Messages
1,223
The one big reason why this will be doomed to failure is the "BML", so we will keep the 55 FLUs at three bridges and the other side of the water can have the 60 RLUs working out if Hornsey and thus spit the core up, lmao :D
 

bramling

Veteran Member
Joined
5 Mar 2012
Messages
20,306
Location
Hertfordshire / Teesdale
The one big reason why this will be doomed to failure is the "BML", so we will keep the 55 FLUs at three bridges and the other side of the water can have the 60 RLUs working out if Hornsey and thus spit the core up, lmao :D

No thanks. Scrap the RLUs (perhaps alongside the 707s which it seems have fallen out of favour before even carrying a single passenger!), and we'll keep the 365s.
 

trainmania100

Established Member
Joined
8 Nov 2015
Messages
3,031
Location
Newhaven
Does anyone have any light regarding this weekends test via HOVE will be on the saturday or the sunday?
I must plan in advance for seeing this AND the Bluebell Diesel Gala
Many thanks
 

adamedwards

Member
Joined
4 Apr 2016
Messages
796
FLU = full length unit, i.e. 12 car

RLU = reduced length unit, i.e. 8 cart

The 8-cars are needed for Sevenoaks and Sutton loop services south of the river, don''t know about north...

Hatfield only has 8 car platforms. Also Hendon, which I also use. 8 cars will be on the stoppers with 12 car on faster trains to Cambridge, Bedford and Peterborough calling at stations with longer platforms.
 

asylumxl

Established Member
Joined
12 Feb 2009
Messages
4,260
Location
Hiding in your shadow
Hatfield only has 8 car platforms. Also Hendon, which I also use. 8 cars will be on the stoppers with 12 car on faster trains to Cambridge, Bedford and Peterborough calling at stations with longer platforms.

It's such a shame Thameslink don't have SDO capable trains so they could use 12 carriage trains on 8 carriage platforms... Oh, wait :lol:.
 

JonathanH

Veteran Member
Joined
29 May 2011
Messages
23,253
It's such a shame Thameslink don't have SDO capable trains so they could use 12 carriage trains on 8 carriage platforms... Oh, wait :lol:.

Even if you can stop 12-carriage trains on 8-carriage platforms, in some places you don't fit inside points, junctions etc. Stopping a 12-car train on a regular basis at Tulse Hill wouldn't be too clever for example.
 

asylumxl

Established Member
Joined
12 Feb 2009
Messages
4,260
Location
Hiding in your shadow
Even if you can stop 12-carriage trains on 8-carriage platforms, in some places you don't fit inside points, junctions etc. Stopping a 12-car train on a regular basis at Tulse Hill wouldn't be too clever for example.

True, but on some peak services in the morning (particularly those beginning at Bedford) it may well make sense to do so, if possible.
 

westcoaster

Established Member
Joined
4 Dec 2006
Messages
4,490
Location
DTOS A or B
Even if you can stop 12-carriage trains on 8-carriage platforms, in some places you don't fit inside points, junctions etc. Stopping a 12-car train on a regular basis at Tulse Hill wouldn't be too clever for example.

But 700's are only SDO 6 1/2 at tulse hill so lots of point hanging on the island platforms.
 

JonathanH

Veteran Member
Joined
29 May 2011
Messages
23,253
Forgive my ignorance, but is 24tph even necessary?

It is only 24tph in the peak (and even then only really the high peak) in one direction. At other times, the Sevenoaks service terminates at Blackfriars and services from Littlehampton and East Grinstead don't run so 18tph.
 

OFFDN

Member
Joined
30 Nov 2016
Messages
87
Location
Herne Hill
Does anyone have any light regarding this weekends test via HOVE will be on the saturday or the sunday?
I must plan in advance for seeing this AND the Bluebell Diesel Gala
Many thanks

Sunday. From the people I've spoken to it should be mainly during the morning/early afternoon, but can't confirm. Keep an eye on realtimetrains/opentraintimes?
 

Bald Rick

Veteran Member
Joined
28 Sep 2010
Messages
35,583
It is only 24tph in the peak (and even then only really the high peak) in one direction. At other times, the Sevenoaks service terminates at Blackfriars and services from Littlehampton and East Grinstead don't run so 18tph.

Both directions.
 

MikePJ

Member
Joined
10 Dec 2015
Messages
1,002
There was a 700 in the sidings north of Cambridge station this morning, first time I've seen one there. Looked like a 12-car, but I couldn't tell as part of it was concealed by Mill Road bridge.
 

urpert

Member
Joined
1 Dec 2015
Messages
1,169
Location
Essendine or between Étaples and Rang-du-Fliers
It is only 24tph in the peak (and even then only really the high peak) in one direction. At other times, the Sevenoaks service terminates at Blackfriars and services from Littlehampton and East Grinstead don't run so 18tph.

To be pedantic, the Sevenoaks trains only terminate at Blackfriars at weekends, during the week they run through to Kentish Town/West Hampstead.
 

SprinterMan

Established Member
Joined
20 Sep 2010
Messages
2,341
Location
Hertford
To be pedantic, the Sevenoaks trains only terminate at Blackfriars at weekends, during the week they run through to Kentish Town/West Hampstead.

Under the new timetable, off-peak M-F the Sevenoaks trains will terminate at Blackfriars, and the Orpington trains will terminate at Kentish Town.

Adam :)
 

SprinterMan

Established Member
Joined
20 Sep 2010
Messages
2,341
Location
Hertford
I thought that was just one of the potential options for the Dec 2018 timetable?

It's the one they are going with AFAIK. In the peaks, the Sevenoaks trains will start back from Welwyn Garden City, calling at Hatfield, Potters Bar, New Barnet, Oakleigh Park and New Southgate, before running through the core via Finsbury Park.

Adam :)
 

urpert

Member
Joined
1 Dec 2015
Messages
1,169
Location
Essendine or between Étaples and Rang-du-Fliers
It's the one they are going with AFAIK. In the peaks, the Sevenoaks trains will start back from Welwyn Garden City, calling at Hatfield, Potters Bar, New Barnet, Oakleigh Park and New Southgate, before running through the core via Finsbury Park.

Adam :)

Thanks. If it's settled that's good news for us on the Catford Loop (an effective doubling of our service to a London terminal).
 

spark001uk

Established Member
Joined
20 Aug 2010
Messages
2,385
Quick question - why does this class use both pans, whereas a pendo for example only uses one?
 

Billy A

Member
Joined
9 Jan 2017
Messages
171
Quick question - why does this class use both pans, whereas a pendo for example only uses one?
Built in redundancy, the train operates as if it were two units coupled together so a failure on one won't immobilise both. That's the theory anyway, the practice seems a little different.
 

swt_passenger

Veteran Member
Joined
7 Apr 2010
Messages
34,227
Built in redundancy, the train operates as if it were two units coupled together so a failure on one won't immobilise both. That's the theory anyway, the practice seems a little different.

345s seem to be the same (in terms of both pans up) as well, just checked a couple of videos of them on test.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top