175001
On Moderation
Anyone else sick to absolute death hearing about the oasis that is the Mid Cheshire line?
Last edited:
Plans are being put in place for ATW to make extra calls at certain stations between Crewe and Manchester. I woudn't be surprised if XC end up stopping at Congleton as well but I've not heard anything from over there. Altrincham - Manchester would be a waste of valuable managers to work trains given they have Metrolink.
The guards might '.....not like it' but perhaps the company is thinking of the passengers - you know, those people who pay the fares.
Surely the guard has no choice in what stations a train stops at to pick up and set down passengers. If one guard with an attitude problem thinks they should have that right then he deserves to be sacked so the guards who haven't grown too big for their boots can stay in employment as guards.
....but perhaps the company is thinking of the passengers....
Surely the guard has no choice in what stations a train stops at to pick up and set down passengers. If one guard with an attitude problem thinks they should have that right then he deserves to be sacked so the guards who haven't grown too big for their boots can stay in employment as guards.
Anyone else sick to absolute death hearing about the oasis that is the Mid Cheshire line?
Oh... You weren't joking....
The company aren't interested in the passengers, they are only interested in the money that passengers bring.
I think it's more that TPE may choose not to do it so as to keep their industrial relations good.
No need to contact head office, it's very plainly explained in the front pages of the ASLEF diary for all drivers to see.
It's not about "having a day at home", it's about not crossing the picket line and supporting your fellow workers, which to some people is a big deal, including me.
That sounds horribly like the RMT attitude about 40 years ago - or 20 years ago - or 10 years ago - or this year.
Surely the guard has no choice in what stations a train stops at to pick up and set down passengers. If one guard with an attitude problem thinks they should have that right then he deserves to be sacked so the guards who haven't grown too big for their boots can stay in employment as guards.
Not sure the front pages of the ASLEF diary would count for much in the High Court.
It's the law, so it wouldn't even get to court.
Look it up, protected action.
The guards may not like it but they will indeed do it, we're all professionals (and besides, the act of physically stopping a train at a station platform isn't really our department). I think the point being made is that it might provoke them, and cause worse relations and a greater chance of industrial action at ATW or XC in the future, which might outweigh the benefits of making those extra calls.
There will of course also be safety considerations to bear in mind. Neither ATW nor XC are especially blessed with spare capacity at the best of times, even before you dump all of Northerns passengers on top.
That's the trouble with RUGs that I've dealt with over the years, there's always one who thinks he's better. Thank God I don't sign that route.I'm sick of one person responding to all of my posts by bringing up one of the largest RUGs and insulting their work. It's almost equivalent to a guard being horrible to every passenger because one passenger on a full 4 car train said something he didn't agree with.
Yes, correct, those passengers who pay the fares...........so that, in turn, you can then be given a rewarding job keeping them safe.
Anyone else sick to absolute death hearing about the oasis that is the Mid Cheshire line?
So as the railways are also subsidised I pay tax, which goes to the government, which then gets divided around doing different things like subsidising the railway! So does that make me self employed? :roll:
So as the railways are also subsidised I pay tax, which goes to the government, which then gets divided around doing different things like subsidising the railway! So does that make me self employed? :roll:
No need to contact head office, it's very plainly explained in the front pages of the ASLEF diary for all drivers to see.
It's not about "having a day at home", it's about not crossing the picket line and supporting your fellow workers, which to some people is a big deal, including me.
I have looked at all the pages of 3 old ASLEF diaries & nowhere does it say that ASLEF drivers should not cross RMT guard's picket lines. I would caution any driver who is thinking of taking mtbox's advice by refusing to cross a guard's picket line to contact their ASLEF district organiser immediately or head office in Clerkenwell. Why do Southern drivers work during RMT strikes? Because they would be breaching their contract if they refused to work for mtbox's reason. And of course they might consider the RMT strike a lost cause.
mtbox:
Rather than diary, read the ASLEF circular that relates to this strike. It's very black and white on what ASLEF drivers should do on Monday.
Yet Metrolink say Northern haven't made any arrangements with them for ticket acceptance on any services on Monday.
Edit: Quote updated - the website previously stated any ticket on the above routes and monthly seasons on any route (including the Airport and Bury lines).Metrolink (Manchester) will accept monthly and above season tickets on the following Metrolink routes:
- Altrincham Manchester
- Ashton-under-Lyne Manchester
- Eccles Manchester
- East Didsbury Manchester
- Rochdale Manchester
Surely the guard has no choice in what stations a train stops at to pick up and set down passengers. If one guard with an attitude problem thinks they should have that right then he deserves to be sacked so the guards who haven't grown too big for their boots can stay in employment as guards.
Are guards cleared to handle the PTI at stations with which they are unfamiliar?