PHILIPE
Veteran Member
That reminds me. I must watch "Life of Brian" again!
They should get the hell out of it rather than destroy the Labour Party just for the sake of protesting and not interested in winning an election.
That reminds me. I must watch "Life of Brian" again!
He could do a lot worse than giving women opportunities. Just be glad he doesn't want to get rid of all menfolk from the party.
It's the current year, jobs should be awarded based on performance and merit and not based on what genitals you happen to have.
The two are not exclusive. There are numerous instances where the person best qualified for a position was female, but not given the position.The important factor here is discrimination. We get companies and others saying there should be more women on Boards or other functions. This is what I term as sexism or even sexual discrimination against men which you never hear of.
Job appointments should be entirely on merit WITHOUT DISCRIMINATION against any section of the community.
So you think that in the nearly four years we have until the next General Election, there is absolutely no chance that Jeremy Corbyn can argue against Tory policy and enthuse enough of the populace to vote against it?It is puritanical socialism which ensures the people really suffering under Tory rule and consigned to almost constant Tory rule. It is enraging that they seek to transform a serious political party into a joke rather than try to win power and change things.
So you think that in the nearly four years we have until the next General Election, there is absolutely no chance that Jeremy Corbyn can argue against Tory policy and enthuse enough of the populace to vote against it?
If there were a General Election this year, I might agree with you, but a week is a long time in politics, and three years might as well be an eternity.
So you think that in the nearly four years we have until the next General Election, there is absolutely no chance that Jeremy Corbyn can argue against Tory policy and enthuse enough of the populace to vote against it?
If there were a General Election this year, I might agree with you, but a week is a long time in politics, and three years might as well be an eternity.
I think if he had eternity, Jeremy Corbyn could not appear as a potential Prime Minister. (That's as a long-time Labour supporter).
In many ways I like the cut of Owen Smith's jib, but I don't know if I can vote for someone who supports institutional sexism.
I think it's important that we try to eliminate gender discrimination, but Smith wants to make it official Party policy. It's almost as though Smith has seen the success Trump has had and thought "Hey, discrimination against a minority group really seems to work. I've got to get myself a piece of that action!".
The Labour party often trumpets itself as the party of equality and non gender bias. just remind me again, which party has had two female leaders and prime Ministers?
The Labour party often trumpets itself as the party of equality and non gender bias. just remind me again, which party has had two female leaders and prime Ministers?
The Labour party often trumpets itself as the party of equality and non gender bias. just remind me again, which party has had two female leaders and prime Ministers?
The following have been accused of having an anti-Corbyn bias:
1. Sky News
2. LBC
3. The Sun
4. The Daily Mail
5. Metro
6. The Evening Standard
7. BBC
8. The Telegraph
9. The Mirror
10. The Guardian
11. The Independent
12. Huffington Post
So everyone except The Socialist Worker![]()
The following have been accused of having an anti-Corbyn bias:
1. Sky News
2. LBC
3. The Sun
4. The Daily Mail
5. Metro
6. The Evening Standard
7. BBC
8. The Telegraph
9. The Mirror
10. The Guardian
11. The Independent
12. Huffington Post
So everyone except The Socialist Worker![]()
--- old post above --- --- new post below ---1. A pledge to focus on equality of outcome, not equality of opportunity.
2. Scrapping the DWP and replacing it with a Ministry for Labour and a Department for Social Security.
3. Introducing modern wages councils for hotel, shop and care workers to strengthen terms and conditions.
4. Banning zero hour contracts.
5. Ending the public sector pay freeze.
6. Extending the right to information and consultation to cover all workplaces with more than 50 employees.
7. Ensuring workers’ representation on remuneration committees.
8. Repealing the Trade Union Act.
9. Increase spending on the NHS by 4% in real-terms in every year of the next parliament.
10. Commit to bringing NHS funding up to the European average within the first term of a Labour Government.
11. Greater spending on schools and libraries.
12. Re-instate the 50p top rate of income tax.
13. Reverse the reductions in Corporation Tax due to take place over the next four years.
14. Reverse cuts to Inheritance Tax announced in the Summer Budget.
15. Reverse cuts to Capital Gains Tax announced in the Summer Budget.
16. Introduce a new wealth Tax on the top 1% earners.
17. A British New Deal unveiling £200bn of investment over five years.
18. A commitment to invest tens of billions in the North of England, and to bring forward High Speed 3.
19. A pledge to build 300,000 homes in every year of the next parliament – 1.5 million over five years.
20. Ending the scandal of fuel poverty by investing in efficient energy.
Or the Express, if your list is accurate![]()
To be fair, anyone can accuse any paper of bias. So unless, the accusation has come from a reputable/disinterested source or is backed up by reasonable evidence, the fact that the above outlets have been accused of anti-Corbyn bias doesn't really by itself tell you much.
Pledge 1 sounds a little sinister, and I can't see it being a vote winner.
Apart from that there are some good ideas there.
Owen Smith's leadership pledges
It's a shame then that it won't be put to the public then, at least not under a Labour banner.
If you were a record you'd not be broken, you'd be separated in to billions of individual carbon and hydrogen atoms [emoji13] .Got my vote - although anyone but Corbyn has my vote!
I'm sure Labour's 2020 election manifesto under Corbyn will be just as good, if not better!
It's a shame then that it won't be put to the public then, at least not under a Labour banner.
And on what premise do you base your view it is an aspirational view?On what premise do you base your aspirational view of the matter?
On what premise do you base your aspirational view of the matter?
I think if he had eternity, Jeremy Corbyn could not appear as a potential Prime Minister. (That's as a long-time Labour supporter).
The vast majority of Smith's pledges are things Corbyn has already stated he would do himself.
I'm not sure of Corbyn's position on HS3 though, but I do know he's generally quite pro-rail.