• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Could sleeper trains run through the Channel Tunnel?

Status
Not open for further replies.

RichmondCommu

Established Member
Joined
23 Feb 2010
Messages
6,906
Location
Richmond, London
My girlfriend is half-Chinese and grew up in Beijing. It is not North Korea. Christ, I genuinely don't know how to reply to this other than by stating it's almost utterly wrong. Even the bit about poor people not being able to travel is wrong - people will happily (or not) fill up the *seats* for the 30+ hour trips to far-fling places because they are cheap. Particularly around the festivals, where visiting family is extremely common. Mass migration within China is enormous right now too - look it up, which only furthers my point about people being very used to taking the train over long distances.

There is no need to call me Christ, in this setting Richmond Commuter will do fine. I'm very much aware of the mass economic migration currently taking place in China and the reasons for it and indeed I referred to this in a previous post.

However one thing I'm not clear on is whether you honestly think that those Chinese who can afford a holiday in Europe are going to take the train to Italy, or France, or the UK? Why would they do that if they can afford to fly (and you have to assume here that if they can afford a holiday in Europe they can afford the cost of a airline ticket)

Frankly, I'm not really sure what to say to you other than to go there yourself. "What the Chinese state wants you to see" doesn't apply anywhere outside of perhaps Tibet, and once again it's the engrained culture of long-distance train travel that is so important and that you're not picking up on. This is not Europe, for the umpteenth time.

My wife and I have been to China for holiday, although I admit that was around 10 years a go when we got married. On our trip we saw some amazing scenery and met some lovely people. However we also experienced an incident which included our camera, a petty thief and a bullet to the head. We would love to return one day but only when China's human rights record starts to improve. For the time being we will continue to head to other areas of Asia / the World.
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

Bletchleyite

Veteran Member
Joined
20 Oct 2014
Messages
113,557
Location
"Marston Vale mafia"
I think the point is that in Europe Sleeping Car trains are not seen as an economic proposition, hence why they have been on the decline over the last 50 years, almost to the point of extinction.

Which is IMO why the likes of Thello are a bit rough round the edges - they are running them on the cheap. The only way to do them well is to subsidise them for social need - which is why the UK ones are quite a lot better in my view - but it's harder to justify that when flying doesn't need the subsidy and solves the problem better in many cases.

DB NachtZug was a similar concept, as was the original CityNightLine, uniting a load of the rough round the edges D-Zuege and EuroNight services that ran in and through Germany with a higher quality service proposition - and in the late 1990s it did work. Problem is along came the low-cost airlines and their new A320s/737s, and away went the business custom - and you're left with a basket case.
 
Last edited:

RT4038

Established Member
Joined
22 Feb 2014
Messages
5,456
Which is IMO why the likes of Thello are a bit rough round the edges - they are running them on the cheap. The only way to do them well is to subsidise them for social need - which is why the UK ones are quite a lot better in my view - but it's harder to justify that when flying doesn't need the subsidy and solves the problem better in many cases.

DB NachtZug was a similar concept, as was the original CityNightLine, uniting a load of the rough round the edges D-Zuege and EuroNight services that ran in and through Germany with a higher quality service proposition - and in the late 1990s it did work. Problem is along came the low-cost airlines and their new A320s/737s, and away went the business custom - and you're left with a basket case.

And now the rolling stock is 15 years older and certainly not making enough money for replacement. Add the problem of daytime trains now being EMUs, so locomotive use is either inefficient or shared with freight operators (who also want to use them at night, when the freight paths are available due to intensive daytime passenger service). Ride them now, while you still can!
 

jon0844

Veteran Member
Joined
1 Feb 2009
Messages
30,913
Location
UK
I've just come back from a week at Disneyland Paris, via Eurostar (4 hours door to door!) and as a family, the train is SOOO much nicer than flying it's unreal.

I'd certainly consider more family travels via train, including sleepers, if they existed to allow us to go further afield. I am sure many others would too. Maybe not every day of the week, but certainly a few times.

I don't know if it could make money, but there has to be a market for people who would rather not waste 2-3 hours just getting to an airport and clearing security, waiting at the gate, when you can rock up to St Pancras 30 minutes before travel, board, sit down and relax without having to sit through safety announcements, belt up etc etc.

The people who want to treat the train journey as part of their holiday aren't even necessarily people who will take away business from the airlines. It's a different type of travel.
 
Joined
10 Mar 2013
Messages
1,010
I've just come back from a week at Disneyland Paris, via Eurostar (4 hours door to door!) and as a family, the train is SOOO much nicer than flying it's unreal.

I'd certainly consider more family travels via train, including sleepers, if they existed to allow us to go further afield. I am sure many others would too. Maybe not every day of the week, but certainly a few times.

I don't know if it could make money, but there has to be a market for people who would rather not waste 2-3 hours just getting to an airport and clearing security, waiting at the gate, when you can rock up to St Pancras 30 minutes before travel, board, sit down and relax without having to sit through safety announcements, belt up etc etc.

The people who want to treat the train journey as part of their holiday aren't even necessarily people who will take away business from the airlines. It's a different type of travel.

the train can 'win' on relatively short distances if you count thhe door to door journey time and also the hasle or otherwise of getting to the terminals ...
 

jon0844

Veteran Member
Joined
1 Feb 2009
Messages
30,913
Location
UK
the train can 'win' on relatively short distances if you count thhe door to door journey time and also the hasle or otherwise of getting to the terminals ...

I think it can 'win' on longer journeys, where an overnight stay on the train enables you to cover a far bigger distance than you might comfortably wish to do in a single day (while awake).

I think Brits would quite like a train that could go direct to Spain, for example, even if it just ran in the summer months.

You could then build modern stock to use as efficiently as possible throughout the year to selected destinations.

I am sure they could make money, especially if they adopted the idea I've said for ages (and may well be happening) where you have first class cabins, accompanied by airline style beds/pods for standard - thus allowing a lot more people to fit on a train.
 

DownSouth

Established Member
Joined
10 Dec 2011
Messages
1,545
the train can 'win' on relatively short distances if you count thhe door to door journey time and also the hasle or otherwise of getting to the terminals ...
Whether that's true for real door to door journey times depends on the quality of the more local transport links used to get to the high speed rail station. Most of these 'comparisons' are based upon 'door to door' journeys where both the origin and destination are in the centre of those city centres fortunate enough to have a high speed rail link, but that's just as arbitrary as starting and finishing at airports.

If I lived in an area such as Slough, Heathrow might well be more convenient for me to get to Brussels for a day of work than the 'superior' service offered by Eurostar because getting to use Eurostar means battling into central London.
 

jon0844

Veteran Member
Joined
1 Feb 2009
Messages
30,913
Location
UK
There are multiple routes into central London, with Euston and Liverpool Street very close to St Pancras - and the other terminals not a million miles away.

Heathrow is convenient for some people, obviously, but perhaps not for a lot of people who can get in on a fairly fast train to central London and be on Eurostar with relative ease. 30 minute check-in, and very easy security to clear, are all plus points. Once you board the train, you're done.

I'm not going to stop flying and fly a lot more than I use Eurostar (perhaps 2-3 times a year on average) but there's something about the train that's just so much more convenient - but I feel that the routes are still pretty limited and it's capable of so much more.

Also, if you were going to take a sleeper service then chances are you'd be leaving quite late in the day (and arriving early) so the 'battle' into London wouldn't be that big a problem.
 
Last edited:

WestCoast

Established Member
Joined
19 Jun 2010
Messages
5,665
Location
South Yorkshire
I think it can 'win' on longer journeys, where an overnight stay on the train enables you to cover a far bigger distance than you might comfortably wish to do in a single day (while awake).

I think sleeper trains are a very good concept. However, I've had reason to use them with a large network from Munich, I now see them a little less 'romantically'. With CityNightLine on the Munich-Berlin line the trains have to be timed (10h30ish) to take almost twice as long as the daytime ICE/ICs to account for prolonged stops, slower running speeds and late night engineering works. In theory, yes you save on accommodation.

As a single traveller with CityNightLine they're great if you've got an economy or deluxe private compartment (€160 one way saver fare often what I can find). When I last went to Berlin I went there in a reclining seat and got very little sleep, felt like a zombie the next day. In the couchette a little better, but it depends on your neighbours. If you're travelling as a group on holiday it can be a great adventure, but the single traveller on their way to a meeting or whatever, not always great. This is party why the plane (15x daily+, 1h10 plus airport time) and day trains (hourly ish, 6h30) are far more popular.

I'm sure there is a market, but I don't think it's a huge one. DB touts that the sleepers are very expensive to run and has recently withdrawn the double decker CNL stock that wasn't that old (it had the luxury ensuite rooms), citing costs.

Sure, we could revolutionise sleepers with lie-flat beds etc, but atm an entirely commercial venture (government support would be limited in the current times I'd imagine) from the UK to the continent is not realisitc.
 
Last edited:

Tim R-T-C

Established Member
Joined
23 May 2011
Messages
2,143
For me a Chunnel sleeper would be ideal - when I am going on holiday by E*, I travel down the night before after work to London then have to spend a night in a hotel before getting a morning train. So being able to get down to London then catching a midnight E* sleeper and waking up in Paris would be highly convenient.
 

edwin_m

Veteran Member
Joined
21 Apr 2013
Messages
28,684
Location
Nottingham
Most of these 'comparisons' are based upon 'door to door' journeys where both the origin and destination are in the centre of those city centres fortunate enough to have a high speed rail link, but that's just as arbitrary as starting and finishing at airports.

Not quite - city centres are places a lot of people actually want to travel to, and airports generally aren't.

Agree there won't be that many centre to centre journeys. Many will be suburb to centre as someone is starting out from home for a business trip, and some will be suburb to suburb. But experience on several routes in various countries is that once the centre to centre journey gets down to about 3hr (so the suburb to centre journey is maybe 4hr) rail tends to win out over air.
 

Bald Rick

Veteran Member
Joined
28 Sep 2010
Messages
35,838
I think it can 'win' on longer journeys, where an overnight stay on the train enables you to cover a far bigger distance than you might comfortably wish to do in a single day (while awake).

I think Brits would quite like a train that could go direct to Spain, for example, even if it just ran in the summer months.

You could then build modern stock to use as efficiently as possible throughout the year to selected destinations.

I am sure they could make money, especially if they adopted the idea I've said for ages (and may well be happening) where you have first class cabins, accompanied by airline style beds/pods for standard - thus allowing a lot more people to fit on a train.


We've had this discussion before, years ago, but the economics simply do not stack up. Let alone the politics.

London - Barcelona would be in the order of 8 hours non stop using the LGVs at full speed (if you could persuade the French to give up night time maintenance, which they won't).

But let's say you could, you wouldn't get much sleep on a train bowling along at 300kph, what with SNCFs rather liberal interpretation of cant deficiency. So they would have to go slower for comfort. And they would have to stop for crew changes. And there's unlikely to be enough traffic to fill a nightly sleeper to Barca non stop, so it would need to stop en route elsewhere, eg Lyon, Montpellier, Perpignan. You'd be looking at 12 hours minimum. By comparison the current sleepers from Paris to the Spanish Border at Port Bou take 10h30.

12 hours means 3 sets of drivers / guards (based at 3 locations) and 2 sets of on board staff. To provide the sort of service 'first class' passengers expect, would need 1 attendant per coach for first, and 1 per 2 coaches for standard. Say 8 per train. That's a total of 22 staff shifts per train, most of whom need paying at a rate for people willing to work permanent nights and being (at least) bilingual. Rule of thumb is that actual staff costs are broadly twice salary, so it's not unreasonable to say that just staffing one train will cost £10k a night. Many would be lodging at the end of journey being away from home, but that is small change in this.

Track access fees will be easily treble that per train. It's several thousand just for 31miles of the tunnel. Let's say £30k London to Barca predominantly on high speed lines.

Energy. These trains will need plenty just for hotel power. Plus the juice necessary to get the trains up to 100mph+ for the best part of 12 hours. Another £5k.

Carriage servicing / maintenance, being optimistic we will use existing facilities, but still need a few people at either end to remake beds, clean toilets etc etc in day time. Plus full maintenance over the year averaged (these will be high mileage trains). Another couple of thousand a night.

Cost of the train. It will be minimum £2m a coach. 12 coaches, plus 2 service vehicles per train plus a couple of spares. £30m+ Capital. Dry leasing a train will be c£3m a year. Call it £10k a night.

Loco hire (or power cars if we're doing an MU). A single loco to go all the way will be very complicated and rather specialised (particularly to meet SNCFs axle loading requirements on the LGVs). So power cars will be best. Whichever way you add it up it will be another £10k a night for one train.

Staff at the stations either end. Either your own or hired in from 'other' operators. Another couple of thousand a night.

Overhead costs of selling tickets, running website, renting space at stations, managing staff (over a very wide geography with various home bases), managing the contractual issues with at least 4 infrastructure operators, and generally running the company. Let's add 20%.

I make all that about £90k cost per train, and having worked in the sleeper team many years ago, I think that's being optimistic.

Let's say this train has 4 coaches first class at 8 cabins per coach, 8 coaches standard 'pods' / lie flat beds at 20 a coach, 192 people per train. Assume a (very) optimistic 85% occupancy (Cally Sleeper would kill for that). 165 punters per night.

That's an average ticket price of £545 per one way trip to break even.

I genuinely don't know anyone who would be interested. Let alone several hundred a night.
 
Last edited:

jon0844

Veteran Member
Joined
1 Feb 2009
Messages
30,913
Location
UK
I'm not saying it's possible or practical, and appreciate the time taken to give reasonings, but I do think there could be a market. I never said it would happen.

Look how hard it is to even get extended services to Germany from St Pancras, running during the day!
 
Joined
9 Jul 2011
Messages
825
An excellent summary Bald Rick.
Rail doesn't scale very well for very long distances as the opposite of economies of scale (or rather distance, in the case of rail), takes effect. A sleeper train being by far the worst case.


z
--- old post above --- --- new post below ---
....Look how hard it is to even get extended services to Germany from St Pancras, running during the day!

Indeed. When DB looked hard at the figures they pulled right back from their previous position; citing that the market wasn't really large enough.


 
Last edited:

najaB

Veteran Member
Joined
28 Aug 2011
Messages
33,695
Location
Scotland
What are the rules on mixing passengers and freight on one train? If we're talking sleeper trains there might be a secondary revenue stream for overnight delivery of things that are on the bulky/heavy side for air freight.
 

Bald Rick

Veteran Member
Joined
28 Sep 2010
Messages
35,838
Quite a pessimistic view but I tend to agree, such trains are hard to make profitable.

France is surprisingly liberal in regards to maximum working time for drivers (and guards), so no more than 2 crews should be required. See here: http://www.cheminots.net/forum/topic/40321-temps-maximum-de-conduite/

I also believe something more dense than 20 pods per coach in standard should be considered.

French was my worst GCSE so I only got the jist of that thread. But I'd be surprised if any Western Europe rail company allowed drivers to drive 6 hours without a break. Hence 3 turns required for a 12 hour trip.

(Ps, French Rail Forums. Wow)
 

NicholasNCE

Member
Joined
29 Jun 2012
Messages
103
cheminots.net is basically the SNCF employees forum, and in that particular thread most replies are from drivers so I tend to believe them.

Le temps de conduite n'est pas réglementé à la SNCF sauf si tout ou partie de la période 00h30-4h30 où c'est limité à 6h00 ou il est nécessaire d'avoir un second agent en cabine, (...)

--> SNCF has no rules on driving time except if all or part of it takes place between 00:30 and 04:30 in which case the upper limit is 6h, above which a second driver should be in the cab throughout...

Daytime TGV Strasbourg > Bordeaux takes 6:51 and according to the same thread is driven by the same driver throughout!
 

HSTEd

Veteran Member
Joined
14 Jul 2011
Messages
20,342
Well I don't imagine LGV driving is very taxing in terms of things like route knowledge.

You spin up to 300km/h+ and stay there until the display on the console tells you to slow down. There are no signal sightings to worry about and almost no junctions or anything to have knowledge of.
 

notadriver

Established Member
Joined
1 Oct 2010
Messages
3,737
Well I don't imagine LGV driving is very taxing in terms of things like route knowledge.

You spin up to 300km/h+ and stay there until the display on the console tells you to slow down. There are no signal sightings to worry about and almost no junctions or anything to have knowledge of.


You are so wrong. You're not a driver are you ?
 

HSTEd

Veteran Member
Joined
14 Jul 2011
Messages
20,342
You are so wrong. You're not a driver are you ?

No, I have never purported to be.
However the limiting effect on the length of driving runs in the UK, judging by discussions on this board, is that the driver will often reach the end of their route knowledge, rather than some sort of time based limitation - this often resulting in freight trains being stranded in places like the middle of Nottingham station.

Route knowledge being based largely upon the ability of someone to maintain sufficient memory of the layout of tracks and signal approaches, a featureless stretch of plain line with no junctions and cab signalling removing the need to remember what the signal positions are relative to the relevant track features would seem to be rather easier to learn than something like the mess that is the approach to Paddington.
 

notadriver

Established Member
Joined
1 Oct 2010
Messages
3,737
So what happens at the end of a high speed line? Is Paris Gare du Nord right at the end of the line, minimal route knowledge straight into the platform ?
 

Envy123

Member
Joined
9 Apr 2015
Messages
633
Location
Peterborough
I've just come back from a week at Disneyland Paris, via Eurostar (4 hours door to door!) and as a family, the train is SOOO much nicer than flying it's unreal.

I'd certainly consider more family travels via train, including sleepers, if they existed to allow us to go further afield. I am sure many others would too. Maybe not every day of the week, but certainly a few times.

I don't know if it could make money, but there has to be a market for people who would rather not waste 2-3 hours just getting to an airport and clearing security, waiting at the gate, when you can rock up to St Pancras 30 minutes before travel, board, sit down and relax without having to sit through safety announcements, belt up etc etc.

The people who want to treat the train journey as part of their holiday aren't even necessarily people who will take away business from the airlines. It's a different type of travel.

Agreed - always loved the sleeper trains between Moscow and Stavropol in Russia. There's always some beautiful scenery which can't be seen on a plane. :D
 

TheKnightWho

Established Member
Joined
17 Oct 2012
Messages
3,183
Location
Oxford
So what happens at the end of a high speed line? Is Paris Gare du Nord right at the end of the line, minimal route knowledge straight into the platform ?

Quite obviously there would still be some complex things to remember.
 

bavvo

Member
Joined
22 Nov 2014
Messages
217
Location
Henley on Thames
We've had this discussion before, years ago, but the economics simply do not stack up. Let alone the politics.
I think you have made an excellent but overly pessimistic analysis there. I'll see if I can make a couple of points (mostly speculative of course) ;)

12 hours means 3 sets of drivers / guards (based at 3 locations) and 2 sets of on board staff. To provide the sort of service 'first class' passengers expect, would need 1 attendant per coach for first, and 1 per 2 coaches for standard. Say 8 per train. That's a total of 22 staff shifts per train, most of whom need paying at a rate for people willing to work permanent nights and being (at least) bilingual. Rule of thumb is that actual staff costs are broadly twice salary, so it's not unreasonable to say that just staffing one train will cost £10k a night. Many would be lodging at the end of journey being away from home, but that is small change in this.
I think you are being over generous with the staffing. I can’t comment on the driver/guard requirements, but 1 attendant per 1st class coach and 1 per 2 2nd class seems over generous.
I would limit provision, it’s an overnight train, there’s no need to overprovide free room service.
Just provide a basic walk up buffet for 2nd class, a single attendant for 1st class. With 3 staff you can rota cover between them allowing for shift breaks. If a full Buffet/Restaurant is required then it should at least charge enough to cover costs (as a mini franchise perhaps).

Track access fees will be easily treble that per train. It's several thousand just for 31miles of the tunnel. Let's say £30k London to Barca predominantly on high speed lines.
The tunnel fees are high, to cover the very high build costs, but beyond that it can use the cheapest path available.
Energy. These trains will need plenty just for hotel power. Plus the juice necessary to get the trains up to 100mph+ for the best part of 12 hours. Another £5k.


Carriage servicing / maintenance, being optimistic we will use existing facilities, but still need a few people at either end to remake beds, clean toilets etc etc in day time. Plus full maintenance over the year averaged (these will be high mileage trains). Another couple of thousand a night.

Cost of the train. It will be minimum £2m a coach. 12 coaches, plus 2 service vehicles per train plus a couple of spares. £30m+ Capital. Dry leasing a train will be c£3m a year. Call it £10k a night.

Loco hire (or power cars if we're doing an MU). A single loco to go all the way will be very complicated and rather specialised (particularly to meet SNCFs axle loading requirements on the LGVs). So power cars will be best. Whichever way you add it up it will be another £10k a night for one train.

Staff at the stations either end. Either your own or hired in from 'other' operators. Another couple of thousand a night.

Overhead costs of selling tickets, running website, renting space at stations, managing staff (over a very wide geography with various home bases), managing the contractual issues with at least 4 infrastructure operators, and generally running the company. Let's add 20%.

I make all that about £90k cost per train, and having worked in the sleeper team many years ago, I think that's being optimistic.

New build will be very expensive, which rules it out as an experiment but it could be a lot cheaper to convert some ex Eurostar carriages to pod/sleeper coaches, even if it ends up loco hauled. Or for a real budget start up, grab the old Caledonian carriages once Serco release them in a couple of years. If you can show the market is there, then that could make new build a possibility.

I personally think the old Eurostars would make an excellent base for sleepers, at their full length you could fit a huge amount of cabins/pods (250 - 400 places depending on density, more with basic reclining seat options), and therefore offer a lower average price per person for each type.
I'm guessing, but I suspect you could get 6 double cabins, 12 longitudinal 'superliner' style cabins, 18 pods or 24 reclining seats in the (admittedly shorter) articulated coaches.

Sadly, I think SNCF would rather just scrap them, than let them be used by anyone else.

Let's say this train has 4 coaches first class at 8 cabins per coach, 8 coaches standard 'pods' / lie flat beds at 20 a coach, 192 people per train. Assume a (very) optimistic 85% occupancy (Cally Sleeper would kill for that). 165 punters per night.
Sercos new sleeper designs have 24 Pods in a pod coach, 7 normal and 4 ensuite cabins in a sleeper coach, so for the same ratio of coaches (4 cabins/8 pods) you get max of 280, or 238 at 85% loading.

There are huge challenges in the sleeper market, but I don't think they are insurmountable. The London - Frankfurt/Berlin business market might be more promising. It will be interesting to see what happens when the new rolling stock comes onstream for the Scottish market.
 

Peter Mugridge

Veteran Member
Joined
8 Apr 2010
Messages
17,842
Location
Epsom
Route knowledge being based largely upon the ability of someone to maintain sufficient memory of the layout of tracks and signal approaches, a featureless stretch of plain line with no junctions and cab signalling removing the need to remember what the signal positions are relative to the relevant track features would seem to be rather easier to learn than something like the mess that is the approach to Paddington.

Far from having no junctions there are in fact a considerable number of classic line connections on the LGV Nord ( for example ) as well as crossovers, maintenance sidings and a number of bridges and even some short tunnels; the drivers will in any case still need to know exactly where they are at all times regardless of the existence of the km posts and other direct clues.

While it is true that there are relatively few conventional junctions, at the speeds they travel the time interval between them isn't that much different from a typical conventional main line.

Taking the LGV-N as the example again, once you've actually joined the LGV about 16km ( 10 miles ) after leaving Gare du Nord you will have first the facing connection to the LGV Le Jonction then the trailing connection a few km later, shortly after that you'll pass Haute Picardie station and only about 20 minutes further along is the huge triangle junction, Fretin, just below Lille. Not forgetting the Arras connection between Haute Picardie and Lille triangle... Shortly after that you'll pass Lille itself and it's only about 30 minutes further on that you'll be approaching Calais, just over 90 minutes from Paris...

So in 90 minutes that's six major junctions plus a similar number of classic connections.

If anything, driving on the LGVs requires a greater level of concentration rather than less. That's why high speed drivers are something of an elite.
 

RichmondCommu

Established Member
Joined
23 Feb 2010
Messages
6,906
Location
Richmond, London
There are huge challenges in the sleeper market, but I don't think they are insurmountable. The London - Frankfurt/Berlin business market might be more promising. It will be interesting to see what happens when the new rolling stock comes onstream for the Scottish market.

However given that DB appear to be in no hurry to run day time ICE services between Germany and London what evidence is there to suggest that any operator would be interested in running an over night service.
--- old post above --- --- new post below ---
New build will be very expensive, which rules it out as an experiment but it could be a lot cheaper to convert some ex Eurostar carriages to pod/sleeper coaches, even if it ends up loco hauled. Or for a real budget start up, grab the old Caledonian carriages once Serco release them in a couple of years. If you can show the market is there, then that could make new build a possibility.

Would they satisfy the safety requirements for travelling under the Channel?
 

bavvo

Member
Joined
22 Nov 2014
Messages
217
Location
Henley on Thames
However given that DB appear to be in no hurry to run day time ICE services between Germany and London what evidence is there to suggest that any operator would be interested in running an over night service.
--- old post above --- --- new post below ---

That's partly the point of running the sleeper. Eight hours plus is generally too long for a daytime service, as spending all day travelling is a very hard sell compared to a flight. But run it overnight and the time factor is cancelled out somewhat, and it could be a viable proposition. It needs the environment sorted out - i.e. quiet and smooth enough to have a reasonable chance of sleep, and a sensible departure, arrival (and checkout time). And of course, would need at least a vaguely competitive fare.

Would they satisfy the safety requirements for travelling under the Channel?

Honestly no idea, probably not is my guess, although I think they at least have retention tanks. The drop down windows and external door handles would probably rule them out though...
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top